User talk:LuvGoldStar

Welcome!

Hello, LuvGoldStar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tundrabuggy (talk) 04:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carina Axelsson entry[edit]

Hi!

Yeah, she's got this weird fan called Unionsoap, keeps pumping her up. I think it's actually Carina herself. PR (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppet[edit]

The case page is here. Cla68 (talk) 00:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MastCell ^Talk 20:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is evidently not your first Wikipedia account. Given the volume and breadth of problems with abusive sockpuppetry on the topics in question, I've blocked this as an inappropriate alternate account. You may presumably continue to contribute using your main account, provided that it has not already been subject to sanctions on the topic in question. You may also appeal this block by following the steps outlined here. Further discussion may be found at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LuvGoldStar. MastCell ^Talk 20:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the most ridiculous abuses of power I've ever come across. The CU came back negative, there's no evidence of any abuse of multiple accounts, yet this user is blocked because s/he is "obviously" a sockpuppet. Is this a precedent to block any I-P editor who edits at intermittent times? --brew crewer (yada, yada) 18:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think there was ample evidence that this is an alternate account of an experienced Wikipedian, and was being used in an inappropriate manner. Needless to say, the evidence goes beyond "editing at intermittent times", at least in my view. If you feel that I've abused my power - particularly if you feel that this is one of the "most ridiculous" such abuses in Wikipedia history - then please feel free to seek review. I wouldn't stand in the way if a consensus, or even an educated minority, of uninvolved editors felt that the block was inappropriate. LuvGoldStar him/herself is also welcome to pursue any or all of the steps involved in appealing a block. MastCell ^Talk 22:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]