User talk:Lemonade51/Archive 6
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
History of LFC FAC
Hey Lemonade, just a gentle reminder to have another look at the FAC when you get a chance. Cheers. NapHit (talk) 11:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1988 Football League Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1988 Football League Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 12:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1988 Football League Cup Final
The article 1988 Football League Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1988 Football League Cup Final for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 13:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1988 Football League Cup Final
The article 1988 Football League Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:1988 Football League Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 20:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2007 Emirates Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2007 Emirates Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2007 Emirates Cup
The article 2007 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2007 Emirates Cup for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2007 Emirates Cup
The article 2007 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2007 Emirates Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 11:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1988 Football League Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Precious
club seasons
Thank you for quality articles such as 1998 FA Charity Shield and The One with All the Thanksgivings, beginning with Sky Sports, for lists such as List of The Simpsons guest stars, for GA reviewing, for serving the project for more than ten years and being "still around", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for today's 2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
A year ago, you were recipient no. 1453 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Two years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wrexham F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wrexham F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
DYK for 1988 Football League Cup Final
On 9 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1988 Football League Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Luton Town Football Club won their first major trophy in 1988? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1988 Football League Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1988 Football League Cup Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 08:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Herbert Chapman
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Herbert Chapman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wrexham F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C.
The article Wrexham F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wrexham F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C. for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wrexham F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C.
The article Wrexham F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wrexham F.C. 2–1 Arsenal F.C. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Herbert Chapman
The article Herbert Chapman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Herbert Chapman for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 22:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Herbert Chapman
The article Herbert Chapman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Herbert Chapman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 17:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, Lemonade51. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Arsenal F.C. managers – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 30. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Remember Totti GA review?
Hi Lemonade51. You may remember a couple months ago the nomination and your review of Francesco Totti's article. Unfortunately, you did not pass the article, but rightfully so. Since then User:Messirulez and I have fixed up a ton of things including most of what your review critiqued such as additional sourcing, better prose, better headings, etc. We believe the article should be up to par now. We know how long it can take for a GA nom to be reviewed and I was wondering if you would have a particular interest in reviewing this article again? I haven't nominated it again yet, but please let me know your thoughts and if you feel compelled to want to give this article a second shot after a large revamping of the article, that would really be appreciated. If you are too busy, don't worry, the WP:GA Cup has just started to get underway this month and should unclog a large portion of the backlog. Thank you, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Lemonade51. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Back in December 2011, by this edit, you added various citations. Several of the citations appear to be to books, but with no indication of the books' titles, e.g. Motson (2005), Clough (2009), Auclair (2009), Edwards (2011), Le Tisser (2009). Can you now identify the books concerned? Thanks. Sussexpeople (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Table formatting
Hi, you mentioned the addition of scope rows in the FLC discussion for List of Cardiff City F.C. players but, when I'm trying to include it in front of each entry, it's changing the whole row instead of just the first field as required. I can't seem to figure out where I'm going wrong with it, is there something obvious I'm missing? Thanks. Kosack (talk) 19:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, I see where I was going wrong now. Seems it was displaying slightly differently for me on the mobile version which threw me off. Thanks very much. Kosack (talk) 21:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Pizzagate (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pizzagate (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizzagate (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Wenger
Hi, noticed that middle names have again been added at Arsène Wenger. In this edit summary you mention authorised biographies stating that Wenger does not have any middle names. Would you mind citing one of these in the article with the correct full name? Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 00:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Running Man Barnstar | |
| 2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season is great work. I hope to use it as inspiration to improve the season articles of more "vincible" teams. Jameboy (talk) 11:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC) |
Fergie
I do have a copy, but not to hand, sorry. – PeeJay 21:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2017 Emirates Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2017 Emirates Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2017 Emirates Cup
The article 2017 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2017 Emirates Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 01:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Liverpool F.C. 0–2 Arsenal F.C. (26 May 1989)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Liverpool F.C. 0–2 Arsenal F.C. (26 May 1989) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 04:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Liverpool F.C. 0–2 Arsenal F.C. (26 May 1989)
The article Liverpool F.C. 0–2 Arsenal F.C. (26 May 1989) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Liverpool F.C. 0–2 Arsenal F.C. (26 May 1989) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season
The article 1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Arsenal F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry
The article Arsenal F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Arsenal F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 11:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Football League Centenary Trophy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Football League Centenary Trophy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Football League Centenary Trophy
The article Football League Centenary Trophy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Football League Centenary Trophy for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Football League Centenary Trophy
The article Football League Centenary Trophy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Football League Centenary Trophy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Lemonade51. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2009 Emirates Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2009 Emirates Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2017 FA Community Shield
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2017 FA Community Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2009 Emirates Cup
The article 2009 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2009 Emirates Cup for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2017 FA Community Shield
The article 2017 FA Community Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2017 FA Community Shield for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2009 Emirates Cup
The article 2009 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2009 Emirates Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2017 FA Community Shield
The article 2017 FA Community Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2017 FA Community Shield for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2011 Emirates Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2011 Emirates Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 07:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2011 Emirates Cup
The article 2011 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2011 Emirates Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 19:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1998 FA Cup Final, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sting, John Barnes and Hot Stuff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2010 Emirates Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2010 Emirates Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2010 Emirates Cup
The article 2010 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2010 Emirates Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 19:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2015 Emirates Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2015 Emirates Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 05:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2015 Emirates Cup
The article 2015 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2015 Emirates Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 20:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2008 Emirates Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2008 Emirates Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2008 Emirates Cup
The article 2008 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2008 Emirates Cup for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2008 Emirates Cup
The article 2008 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2008 Emirates Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2014 Emirates Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2014 Emirates Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 22:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2014 Emirates Cup
The article 2014 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2014 Emirates Cup for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2013 Emirates Cup
The article 2013 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2013 Emirates Cup for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2014 Emirates Cup
The article 2014 Emirates Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2014 Emirates Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Formulaonewiki (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1998 FA Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1998 FA Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1998 FA Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 19:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1998 FA Cup Final
The article 1998 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1998 FA Cup Final for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1998 FA Cup Final
The article 1998 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1998 FA Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Alastair Burnet 1991.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:DECORATIVE use of a non-free screen shot in ITV News at Ten#1967 to 1999: the original run. The reader does not need to see a non-free image to understand that Burnet once hosted the program per WP:FREER, and there is really no sourced critical commentary of the screenshot itself to provide the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Peer review newsletter #1
Introduction
Hello to all! I do not intend to write a regular peer review newsletter but there does occasionally come a time when those interested in contributing to peer review should be contacted, and now is one. I've mailed this out to everyone on the peer review volunteers list, and some editors that have contributed to past discussions. Apologies if I've left you off or contacted you and you didn't want it. Next time there is a newsletter / mass message it will be opt in (here), I'll talk about this below - but first:
- THANK YOU! I want to thank you for your contributions and for volunteering on the list to help out at peer review. Thank you!
- Peer review is useful! It's good to have an active peer review process. This is often the way that we help new or developing editors understand our ways, and improve the quality of their editing - so it fills an important and necessary gap between the teahouse (kindly introduction to our Wikiways) and GA and FA reviews (specific standards uphelp according to a set of quality criteria). And we should try and improve this process where possible (automate, simplify) so it can be used and maintained easily.
Updates
.jpg)
,_160906,_ako.jpg)
Update #1: the peer review volunteers list is changing
The list is here in case you've forgotten: WP:PRV. Kadane has kindly offered to create a bot that will ping editors on the volunteers list with unanswered reviews in their chosen subject areas every so often. You can choose the time interval by changing the "contact" parameter. Options are "never", "monthly", "quarterly", "halfyearly", and "annually". For example:
{{PRV|JohnSmith|History of engineering|contact=monthly}}- if placed in the "History" section, JohnSmith will receive an automatic update every month about unanswered peer reviews relating to history.{{PRV|JaneSmith|Mesopotamian geography, Norwegian fjords|contact=annually}}- if placed in the "Geography" section, JaneSmith will receive an automatic update every yearly about unanswered peer reviews in the geography area.
We can at this stage only use the broad peer review section titles to guide what reviews you'd like, but that's better than nothing! You can also set an interest in multiple separate subject areas that will be updated at different times.
Update #2: a (lean) WikiProject Peer review
I don't think we need a WikiProject with a giant bureaucracy nor all sorts of whiz-bang features. However over the last few years I've found there are times when it would have been useful to have a list of editors that would like to contribute to discussions about the peer review process (e.g. instructions, layout, automation, simplification etc.). Also, it can get kind of lonely on the talk page as I am (correct me if I'm wrong) the only regular contributor, with most editors moving on after 6 - 12 months.
So, I've decided to create "WikiProject Peer review". If you'd like to contribute to the WikiProject, or make yourself available for future newsletters or contact, please add yourself to the list of members.
Update #3: advertising
We plan to do some advertising of peer review, to let editors know about it and how to volunteer to help, at a couple of different venues (Signpost, Village pump, Teahouse etc.) - but have been waiting until we get this bot + WikiProject set up so we have a way to help interested editors make more enduring contributions. So consider yourself forewarned!
And... that's it!
I wish you all well on your Wikivoyages, Tom (LT) (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Lemonade51. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)