User talk:Lastchapter

St. Louis edit-a-thon organizers[edit]

Hurray! I'll look forward to meeting you at the Rare Disease Day edit-a-thon. I'm sad not to make Art+Feminsim! —Verbistheword (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was great meeting you last night! Best of luck at your edit-a-thon on Saturday, and stay in touch! —Verbistheword (talk) 16:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon[edit]

Art+Feminsim

I would be happy to be a facilitator for the event. Jbull991 (talk) 17:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Event listing - suggestion[edit]

Hello, thanks for creating this page! I hope this event goes well. Just a recommendation - when you create an event listing, it's best to add it to the event calendar. This allows people to find and track it, and also will likely increase the likelihood of remote support from experienced contributors who can correct mistakes on pages created and give feedback to new contributors. (Thanks for adding the categories already though - I've also added the category "Meetups in March 2017" also.) Hope this is helpful to you, let me know if any thoughts or questions. Blythwood (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your March editathon[edit]

As you are arranging an editathon on March 26, you might be interested in Women in Red's plans for Women's History Month. We have also developed Ten Simple Rules for new editors interested in creating biographies, which might be useful.

		Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: "Women's History Month" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Account creator granted[edit]

After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 14:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note this is for your event only and will expire after the event. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Visible Wiki Women[edit]

Hi!

We invite you to join the VisibleWikiWoman challenge to make notable women more visible on Wikipedia. We know that during your edit-a-thon several articles will be created or improved. We encourage you to also look for photos or illustrations for these biographies, and upload them to Wikimedia Commons in the VisibleWikiWomen category or through our upload wizard.

Here are some resources that can help, to learn what kind of images can be uploaded to Commons and how to do it.

If you have questions or need help, do not hesitate to contact me.

Have a successful day of editing! --Señoritaleona (talk) 22:08, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018[edit]

		Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April. April+Further with Art+Feminism
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: `@wikiwomeninred`

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saman Arastoo (May 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saman Arastoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saman Arastoo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 02:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lastchapter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 02:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator granted[edit]

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 02:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August and New Achievements at Women in Red[edit]

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90[edit]

An exciting new month for Women in Red!

August 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10
Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
Notable women, broadly-construed!

For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative

All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August.
Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Deletion discussion about Saman Arastoo[edit]

Hello, Lastchapter,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Saman Arastoo should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saman Arastoo .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 03:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April Events[edit]

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117

Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:

New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance
Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers
Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman

Other ways you can participate:

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe
Join the conversations on our talkpage
Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LGBT culture in St. Louis has been accepted[edit]

LGBT culture in St. Louis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 43[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021

New Library Card designs
1Lib1Ref May

St. Louis edit-a-thon organizers[edit]

Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon[edit]

Event listing - suggestion[edit]

Your March editathon[edit]

Account creator granted[edit]

Visible Wiki Women[edit]

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018[edit]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saman Arastoo (May 16)[edit]

Event coordinator granted[edit]

August and New Achievements at Women in Red[edit]

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90[edit]

Deletion discussion about Saman Arastoo[edit]

Women in Red April Events[edit]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LGBT culture in St. Louis has been accepted[edit]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 43[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 45[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 46[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 47[edit]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 48[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 49[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 50[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 51[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 52[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 53[edit]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22[edit]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 54[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 55[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 56[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 57[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 58[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 59[edit]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 60[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 61[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 62[edit]