User talk:LachlanA

Sorry I reverted your link thinking it was vandalism to Mobile phones, I would suggest though adding it to the references at the bottom of the article, instead of in the middle. http://www.att.com/attlabs/reputation/timeline/46mobile.html

Sorry Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 20:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

AIDS first identified

Hi Lachlan

>Could you please specify what you mean about 1 December, 1981 being when "AIDS was first identified"? It is usually stated that the CDC report of 5 June is was the first time the phenomenon was identified. The only references to 1 December I can find are on (or copied from) Wikipedia.

I almost certainly copied it from elsewhere on Wikipedia - I doubt I had a separate source. Ben Finn 20:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

United States Declaration of Independence

I Undid your revision 115366364 because I checked it- the date is correct per the Lee Resolution article JohnCub 18:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Now that I go back and re-read it, it could be interpreted either way. maybe we need to clarify somehow. JohnCub 18:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to bug you, but how does [this] look? JohnCub 18:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

History of Watsonia

Hi LachlanA. Sorry for the delay - I rarely visit Wikipedia these days (too busy). The information was from Monash University's Australian Place Names website. That website has since been taken down, but you can access the information via the Wayback Machine. Here is the link to the Watsonia entry - [1]. Cnwb 04:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Template

Thanks. If you find any others I did that on, let me know. I've been doing it the correct way since about that day. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Brighton-Le-Sands

Please do not change references of Brighton-Le-Sands to contain 'le'. This issue has been discussed at length in the past and the was settled. The NSW Geographic names Board and Rockdale City Council website confirms the spelling as Brighton-Le-Sands. Send me a message, if you wish to discuss further. J Bar 05:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Response on my talk page

I have responded to your question on my talk page. Why not have a look? thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 01:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Aug 6 reference

The book published by Allens: do you have it? Does it add anything to the texts already there?

I notice that none of the references provides a page range, which is a pity. I think they should rightly point the reader towards the relevant chapter or section, don't you? Tony (talk) 12:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

It's the only "Allans" book in the ref list at the bottom of that article. Trouble is, I'm pretty sure that it adds absolutely zilch to the modern view of the augmented 6th chord; i.e., that it's very old-fashioned. If it's like William Lovelock's amateurish harmony books of the ?60s, that is the case. I might consider removing it if no one knows what's in it in relation to the topic. Tony (talk) 12:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Silly me: ambiguity can be elusive to the writer. Tony (talk) 07:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Orthogonality of spheres

Re Talk:Inversive_geometry#Orthogonality_of_spheres.3F

I think it means that at the circle where the two spheres intersect, the tangent planes are orthogonal.

Draw two circles such that they intersect at right angles at their points of intersection, then spin the construction in 3d around the line passing through both centres. That gives you two orthogonal spheres.

When using the poincare model of hyperbolic geometry to represent 3-dimensional hyperbolic space, hyperbolic flat planes are projected as sections of a sphere orthogonal to the boundary.

Paul Murray (talk) 11:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Products manufactured in australia

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Products manufactured in australia. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Economy of Australia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Economy of Australia - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. iBen^talk/_contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 05:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your vigilance, iBen. I don't see how this page duplicates Economy of Australia, any more than say Mining in Australia does. The former page has links to industries like tourism, but none to manufacturing! Aside from that, the purpose of the article is to cover specific brands, including those in fields in which Australia has only vestigial manufacturing, rather than discuss what our main manufacturing is. Please remove the "speedy deletion" tag. Thanks :) LachlanA (talk) 06:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Products Manufactured in Australia and New Zealand

I have nominated Products Manufactured in Australia and New Zealand, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Products Manufactured in Australia and New Zealand. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 23:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Macleod College Crest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Macleod College Crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adam Wierman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Jean Walrand

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jean Walrand. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Identical ancestors point, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fruit flies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Most recent common ancestor page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

WP:OR in Media bias in the United States

I have pared back some of your creative interpretations of a study at Media_bias_in_the_United_States#Liberal. When you use phrases like "Note, however..." that aren't in the the cited sources, this looks like you alone are analyzing the study, and trying to minimize the results. See WP:EDITORIAL for phrases and tone that should be avoided, and please review the policies forbidding of original research and improper synthesis of published sources to draw conclusions that aren't explicitly stated. If there are reliable sources directly commenting on the ASU/TAMU study, we can cite those. If not, we write nothing. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 06:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Convergence proof techniques moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Convergence proof techniques, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Convergence proof techniques (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Convergence proof techniques and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, LachlanA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 07:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Convergence proof techniques. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, LachlanA,

Next time, please move the Draft version of an article back into main space, do not cut & paste content into a new main space article. As the notice states, this breaks up the edit history of the article. It properly should be history-merged to preserve the page histories. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on The Da Vinci Code

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Da Vinci Code, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)