User talk:L.Wadsworth
November 2007[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution by uploading the image Image:M.S Explorer.jpg. Your test worked, and the image that you uploaded has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. the copyright/license information was not included. Ryan Delaney talk 05:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- There's no need to get upset and resort to name-calling. I tagged it for deletion because the image is copyright. You failed to source where you got it from, who took the image, and you didn't include a fair-use rationale on why it should have been uploaded. Also, most images like this are to be placed in Wikimedia Commons. - Cheers, Vicer Userpage | Talk 06:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate images uploaded[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:M.S. Explorer Escape.jpg. The copy called Image:M.S. Explorer Escape.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 08:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:M.S Explorer.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:M.S Explorer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KTC (talk) 10:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Please when correcting, list the actual copyright holder / source. Thanks. KTC (talk) 11:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
3RR[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Australia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Please do not adjust the Australia page again in relation to John Howard/Kevin Rudd until there is a declaration --VS talk 10:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:M.S. Explorer Escape new.jpg[edit]
A tag has been placed on Image:M.S. Explorer Escape new.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:M.S. Explorer Escape new.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KTC (talk) 10:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg[edit]
Please note I've changed the licensing/source of Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg as the image is © AFP/Fuerza Aerea De Chile which means you can't realise it under GFDL as you're not the copyright holder. Please do not upload copyrighted images that you don't have permission for and then tag it as under GFDL. Thanks. KTC (talk) 10:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you called other people "wan^$#%" in your edit summary to Australia. Please do not be uncivil in future. Additionally, I think you might be mistaken as to what "incumbent" means; it does not mean "incoming". - Mark 12:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Incumbent means the current office holder, until KR is sworn in by the GG he isnt the incumbent. Also WP:3RR I notice you have made 6 reverts to KR so far please stop. Gnangarra 12:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
3RR warning[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Australia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. - Mark 12:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
NPA[edit]
This comment looks to me like an WP:NPA, I think you should exercise some restraint you appear to be getting to emotional, its at times like these that good editors get blocks. Gnangarra 13:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
MS Explorer Image[edit]
no one else had a problem with my explorer pic --L. Wadsworth
- Actually, if you take a look at the talk page, a few well-established editors did explain rationale behind the image replacement. Additionally, if you look at the history of the article, the person who changed the image was another well-established editor with knowledge of the fair use issues here. Fair use policy on Wikipedia is extremely tricky, and you would be well-advised to stay away from the matter until you've been around for long enough to have a partial understanding of it (it is so complex that no one can understand the situation entirely). --Constantine (talk) 13:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I apologize if my tone seemed to you in any way insulting, as I only intended to warn you of the considerable difficulties involved with such matters here. I will readily admit that my knowledge of the Fair use policy here is of a most rudimentary nature, and that I would be wary of becoming involved in the area myself. Thus my views on the acceptability of the Explorer picture are based nearly entirely on the judgement of those far more versed in such matters. However, as your new placement of the image does make sense, and would seem to present a reasonable argument for fair use in the context of that section until a Free image can be procured, I won't revert the addition, especially as I personally am inclined to think the image should be included. --Constantine (talk) 13:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, as another note: I don't consider myself a well-established editor. The editors objecting to this were quite experienced. --Constantine (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Belated welcome[edit]
I noticed that it appears nobody has ever given you the standard Wikipedia welcome message, so here it is:
Welcome!
Hello, L.Wadsworth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
-- I hope that helps explain a few things to you and helps you settle in. :) - Mark 14:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Your images[edit]
I put a deletion tag on your two M.S. Explorer images. As I mentioned on the talk page for the ship, AP photos have a much more stringent requirement for fair use justification, and usually are only acceptable if the photo itself is the subject of the article. Thanks. kmccoy (talk) 07:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- You changed the source of one photo from AP to Reuters, yet the URL says it's AP. I don't know how that works, but it doesn't matter. Photos from news/photo agencies are only fair use if the photo itself is the subject of the article. If you can determine that photos created by the Chilean military are in the public domain, then change the images to reflect that, otherwise I will be deleting these photos as copyright violations. Thanks. kmccoy (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny-mt(t)(c)I'm on editor review! 11:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Adoption[edit]
Sure, I'll adopt you. Just change the current userbox on your userpage from {{adoptoffer}} to {{adoptee|Cremepuff222}} and we'll get started. *Cremepuff222* 23:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, feel free to ask me questions. And for your information, I'm likely to reply to your questions on my talk page rather than yours. *Cremepuff222* 22:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Another Australian on the block...[edit]
Welcome! It's nice to see another Wikipedian from Queensland. I'm from Brisbane and I'm open to any questions you might have. Feel free to contact me at any time. Happy editing! — E talkBAG 00:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter[edit]
WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC).
Hervey Bay[edit]
Since you didn't leave an edit summary, would you care to share with me your reason for undoing my edit. The category Category:Towns in Queensland is clearly inappropriate as Hervey Bay is a member of Category:Cities in Queensland and "qld" is the correct format to use in the infobox per {{Infobox Australian Place}}. -- Mattinbgn\talk 05:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, no hard feelings. I was just a little confused as the edit was not a controversial one. I see you have started work on improving the article. Good luck with that and if you ever need a hand please let me know. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 10:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
date[edit]
No matter what you read elsewhere, William Shakespeare's birth date is (as our article makes clear) unknown. - Nunh-huh 07:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, one can provide references to many wrong answers. We try to provide the right ones. - Nunh-huh 07:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- You've now been reverted by two different editors, and you have reverted to your preferred version 3 times. Please be on notice that Wikipedia's three revert rule means that no editor should perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A fourth revert would put you in violation of this rule. The usual penalty for violation is being blocked from editing for 24 hours.
- If you remain convinced of your belief that the article should specify a birth date for Shakespeare, you should feel free to try building a consensus for that change on the talk page of the article. If you don't do so, I am quite confident that your proposed change will continue to be reverted. - Nunh-huh 08:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to William Shakespeare[edit]
Hi. I reverted your change to the info box on this page, so that it continues to match the information in the text. Best. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note on my talk page. It is true that anyone can edit, and edits that add to the encyclopedia are very welcome, but there a few rules. Here's one you might care to have a look at: follow the link here. --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter[edit]
WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC).
As indicated by heading of the section of the article that you edited, the population figures used in the article are the populations of Capital city Statistical Divisions and Statistical Districts. For the Hervey Bay Statistical District, this figure is 48,157 as you can see by looking here. This is the same link that is next to Hervey Bay in the article. The population figure used in the Hervey Bay, Queensland article doesn't have to be the same as the figure used in List of cities in Australia by population.
Incidentally, I had a look at the figure that you used when you edited a few days ago and found that it was actually the the population figure for the Hervey Bay City Council Local Government Area (LGA).[1] The population figure for the Hervey Bay, Queensland article is the population for the town, which is not the same as the LGA. At the reference that you provided[2], if you add the figures under Population in Selected Locations (ABS, 2006) you'll see that they add up to a different figure to that presented as the Hervey Bay Population. This is not an error. If you follow the links provided on the page you can check the figures for each locality. These are the figures that the council uses.
Although I've used the figure that you get when you add up the figures under Population in Selected Locations (ABS, 2006) as the population for Hervey Bay in the Hervey Bay, Queensland article, this is probably not correct as the article identifies a number of towns that are "outside the Hervey Bay area but within the city council boundaries". If you remove these, as probably should happen, the population is only 43,652.
Please also note that the ABS is not wrong. The figures used are the result of actual counts, are checked and rechecked and considered authoritive.
I have reverted the article back to the correct figure. Please do not change it again. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the links that you provided, one is for the 4655 postcode area while the other is for the Hervey Bay Statistical District. If you look at the maps of the postcode area and Statistical District you'll see that in addition to the 4655 postcode area the Statistical District also includes part of the 4659 postcode area. That's the simple reason for the difference.
As for the areas outside the Harvey Bay area, yes they should be covered in the Hervey Bay City Council article but as I've already explained, the Hervey Bay, Queensland article is not the same as Hervey Bay City Council. The council's own figures show that. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Australia[edit]
The image of a Hervey Bay beach that you added to this article, while appropriate for the Hervey Bay, Queensland article is not appropriate for the Australia article. Hervey Bay is not mentioned in the article and the image adds nothing. The image was deleted on the last two occasions taht you added it and I have deleted it again. if you wish to add this image you should discuss it on the talk page first and gain consensus for it to be added or add valid text, with appropriate citations, that makes use of the image. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Edit history is not consensus. It's up to the person wishing to add something to justify inclusion, not the other way round. Now that two editors have objected to the image you have to justify its inclusion. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Australia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You have been warned before on the issue of 3rr. Please do not continue to put up the image regarding Hervey Bay on this article until you can show exactly where, you previously discussed this issue and found that fastest growing city and gateway to fraser i have had this problem before and everyone agreed to move pic to current location --VS talk 10:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Hervey Bay Image on Australia[edit]
- Please show me/us exactly where you have had the discussion on this image so that I can review my concern. I will also post this question to the other editor that has removed the picture. We will await your return and until then please do not put the image back up. Cheers!--VS talk 10:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Once again - please look at my comments above and answer the question fairly. If you make another edit regarding this image I will report you to 3rr. I suggest with respect that you contact your adopter User:Cremepuff222 and ask for further advice before you find yourself blocked for your disruptive reverts.--VS talk 10:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- No one is trying to "Bully" you - we are asking you a legitimate question. You have answered to say that there was a discussion in Oct-Nov last year. I have checked through the edit history of Australia and there is NO discussion regarding the Hervey Bay image at all. Now, quite frankly, I note that you want to be an admin one day - and no doubt you could be BUT first can you start to become part of the team? Others - including myself will be very willing to help - but not if you keep reverting and adding hyperbolic and ad hoc content as you think might fit.--VS talk 10:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of cities in Australia by population. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please note that the rule applies per editor. The use of multiple accounts is not a legitimate way to avoid this limit, and reverts by multiple accounts are counted as reverts made by one editor. The rule otherwise applies to all editors individually. By reverting as User:220.240.147.146 you have broken the three-revert rule --AussieLegend (talk) 12:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Report to 3rr[edit]
As a courtesy I am writing to inform you that I have reported your actions at 3rr breach by User:L.Wadsworth. You have been requested to cease your edits relating to Hervey Bay, Queensland by a number of editors and your continued adjustments - now appearing whilst you are not signed on should cease immediately.--VS talk 12:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
L.Wadsworth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Unfair and was bullied no one gave a reason for removing my work just removed it not fair at all.
Decline reason:
I can see several lengthy explanations above and on the article's talk page. I can also see five or so warnings over 3RR. Additionally, the IP identified in your first unblock request appears to have continued the revert war. I can see no reason to unblock. Kuru talk 01:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Looks like Lara missed a lingering autoblock, when releasing the original block; try again, see if you can edit now? – Luna Santin (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Brisbane meetup[edit]
|
Brisbane Meetup
|
 | |
Delivered on behalf of Dihydrogen Monoxide. Sorry you got this later than some other people - took the lazy botop 2 days to run :) Giggabot (talk) 07:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Editor Review[edit]
I have reviewed you at Wikipedia:Editor review/L.Wadsworth. Sorry it took so long and that I wasn't able to give a more extensive review, there are very few editors willing to work on that backlog. Useight (talk) 08:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Notice of Wikimedia Australia incorporation meeting[edit]
Dear Wikimedian,
I am writing to you as your named is listed at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia under "People interested in helping to create a local chapter". Wikimedia Australia's draft rules have been approved by the Wikimedia Foundation, and we now intend to incorporate in the state of Victoria. You are hereby informed of the intention to hold a Wikimedia Australia meeting on 20th April 2008 with the intention to
(a) authorize a person who has attained the age of 18 years and who is resident in the State to incorporate Wikimedia Australia under the Victorian Associations Incorporation Act 1981; [that is, elect a Public Officer] (b) approve a proposed statement of purposes of Wikimedia Australia; and (c) approve the proposed rules of Wikimedia Australia.
A majority of members must vote to pass the motion to incorporate as an association, for it to meet the requirements of the Act.
The proposed rules, and proposed statement of purpose, can be found here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Draft_Rules_for_Wikimedia_Australia_Inc
Details of the incorporation meeting, including local meetings (to be joined up by teleconferencing, with any luck) and the agenda, can be found here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Incorporation
In particular, you are invited to attend the Melbourne meeting:
- Time: 3pm
- Date: Sunday 20th April 2008
- Location: Computerbank, North Melbourne
- RSVP (optional): at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Incorporation/Melbourne or http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=12283635078
I also encourage you to take part in discussion on the mailing list: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/Wikimediaau-l
If you are unable to attend, you can vote by proxy. Please copy the proxy form at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Proxy_form and send it to me in an email. (It is better to appoint a generic member, e.g. "Meeting Chair" or "Acting Secretary", both of whom will be of Melbourne, rather than a specific member, but the choice is yours.)
If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Yours sincerely, Brianna Laugher Provisional Secretary, Wikimedia Australia
special:emailuser/pfctdayelise skype/irc/wikipedia/meta/commons: pfctdayelise
Brisbane meetup invitation[edit]
|
|
Brisbane Meetup
|
| |
Hey there, you're invited to the second Brisbane Meetup. Please see the page at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/2 for more details. Hope to see you there!
Automated message delivered by Giggabot (stop!) to Wikipedians in Queensland and known Brisbaneites, at 03:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC).
Wikimedia Australia membership now open[edit]
Hello,
I'm writing to let you know that Wikimedia Australia is now accepting members. Membership is $40/year or $20/year concession. There is no joining fee, only the yearly fee. To read a description of the process, go here: <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Membership>
The membership form is here: <http://membership.wikimedia.org.au/memberdb/index.php?page=signup> After completing the form and after the committee approves your application, you will receive an email with instructions on how to pay membership fees.
I am writing to you because you have listed yourself at <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia> as someone interested in the Wikimedia Australia chapter. If you are not longer interested in WMAU I recommend removing yourself from this page.
If you have any questions or encounter any difficulties in this process please contact me. [email protected] or just reply to this email.
thanks, Brianna (pfctdayelise (talk) 12:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)) interim WMAU secretary
WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008[edit]
The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Notification of the upcoming Wikimedia relicensing[edit]
In case you are not aware, the Free Software Foundation has added terms to the GFDL 1.3 allowing the relicensing of certain content under the CC-BY-SA 3.0, and the community has approved with 75.8% in favor that this permission be used to dual-license all Wikimedia wikis under both licenses. On June 15, 2009, this change will take effect. This note is to let you know that {{WikimediaNoLicensing}} does not affect the relicensing of your contributions in this manner, as you cannot deny the terms of the GFDL. If you have any comments, please join the discusion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#NoMultiLicense template. Anomie⚔ 16:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Donald Duck (talk) 04:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bigpond.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Bigpond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iinet webpage.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Iinet webpage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bigpond.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Bigpond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iinet webpage.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Iinet webpage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bigpond.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Bigpond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iinet webpage.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Iinet webpage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
A cupcake for you![edit]
|
hello Jay2k (talk) 01:02, 13 November 2011 (UTC) |
Brisbane workshop and meetup invitation[edit]
|
|
Brisbane Meetup
|
| |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a series of Paralympic History workshops and a meetup next Saturday (26 May) and Sunday. In attendance will be University of Queensland faculty members and Australian Paralympic Committee staff. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/5. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 08:03, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in South East Queensland and Wide Bay-Burnett)
Brisbane meetup with Sue Gardner invitation[edit]
|
Brisbane Meetup Next: 11 February 2013 5-8PM - Drinks and light dinner at SLQ with Sue Gardner Last: 3 August 2012 |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on 11 Febrary 2013 with Sue Gardner.
Details at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/7. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 10:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in SEQ)
RfC:Infobox Road proposal[edit]
WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.
You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS
Nbound (talk) 06:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
New Challenge for Oceania and Australia[edit]
Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion[edit]
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery