User talk:Killervogel5/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Phillies Uniform

I dunno. The lighting seems to be an issue here. In some images, such as the first ones that show up, the uniforms seem to be a deep yellowed cream. However, probing deeper reveals images with a light cream look as well as pictures that appear white. I wasn't sure, and, upon seeing the white-looking images, wrote it down as the artificial lighting simply giving it a yellowed look. The lighter off-white ones appeared to be white, but suffering from dim light. Perhaps it is a light cream. I can't really tell. Perhaps it would be best to just wait and see how it looks on the field unless pictures or video of the uniform being worn outside become available. I hope you don't mind my little rewrite of your image. It was certainly well done, though.--Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 07:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Killervogel5! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.


--Zeitgespenst (talk) 02:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Germany

Welcome, Killervogel5, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Germany}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
  • Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
  • We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

Here are some tasks you can do. Please remove completed tasks from the list.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! -- Agathoclea (talk) 21:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


High School Stuff

Hey, Killervogel5. I see that you're a big contributor to Harford County Public Schools, especially Edgewood High School. Not sure if you are interested in this, but I have been working on high schools on the Eastern Shore, Carroll, and Frederick Counties and have been using www.mpssaa.org to find high school sports teams that have achieved state championships, state finalists, semi-finalists, etc... You can look at Walkersville High School as an example.

Wallstreethotrod (talk) 19:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


You're welcome. I actually went to Bel Air High School. My wife went to Fallston. I started working on Frederick County because most of their high schools had no pages.Wallstreethotrod (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Phillies page

Not a problem helping you out. If you ever need any help, gimmie a holler!

Oh, and just an FYI, you put it in my archives, so I moved it over to my main talk page. No biggie, but just thought I'd let you know in case you were looking for it there ;-) EaglesFanInTampa 20:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Added myself to the Council page...here's hoping there's enough support! EaglesFanInTampa 20:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Phillies WikiProject

No problem :) Whammies Were Here 21:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I just got the word out to everyone in Category:Wikipedian Philadelphia Phillies fans, so that should help get the ball rolling. Even if I get one person to join that way, that's more than not trying. We'll get this all off the ground, that's for sure! EaglesFanInTampa 14:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:PHILLIES

I have created the main outline at Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia Phillies. It still needs some work and expansion.   jj137 (talk) 17:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

OK. I'll try to continue to add some content as well. Additionally, I'll start working on the seasonal articles, as those have very little content.   jj137 (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

"Phightin's" issue

OK, we're still dealing with the IP reverting it back. How do we block the page for the time being? I usually don't deal with this stuff, but when they keep reverting perfectly good edits, it irks me. LOL EaglesFanInTampa 15:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow, I go to lunch for an hour, and you single-handedly solve the issue. You rock! Wish people at my real-life job were just as efficient ;-) EaglesFanInTampa 17:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

On EaglesFanInTampa's talk page you said that I lied. I did not. I wrote to him that I sourced my point. Sourced meaning researched. Also, please do not refer to me as "the IP"---I'm a wikipedia user same as you. And it isn't an issue of "reverting perfectly good edits". Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of credible, researched information. It is also supposed to be open to the public provided any edting done is based on credible research. I have vintage Phillies memorabilia that says "Fightin' Phillies" (rarely "Phils" but that's a moot point). I'd like to think that the items I've collected over twenty years of fanhood have some validity. There is a real sense of exclusivity in the Wikipedia editor community. I am not impugning anybody's fandom or knowledge but on this issue (as silly as it is) I am right. --70.110.235.140 (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)70.110.235.140

Until you sign up for an account, your information is continuously displayed as your IP address, so it's nothing personal, but all anonymous users are "the IP". eBay listings and opposing organizations do not count as credible sources and can't be used. You did, however, erase sources from both a local newspaper and Major League Baseball to prove, as you just said a moment ago, you're "right". It now seems like it's a personal vendetta to show the world that you're the #1 authoritative source for everything Phillies, but in actuality, there's not one person that can claim that. So, before making edits that you "know" are right, look them up with credible sources to see if you truly correct. EaglesFanInTampa 19:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

It's up to you. I'm tempted to be bold and do it, since the situation happened days ago and the 3RR-rule applies only for a 24 hr period. So, lemme know what you're thinking and we'll go from there. EaglesFanInTampa 14:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I did it. Let's see how quickly someone'll revert it now.... EaglesFanInTampa 14:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I received a message from EaglesFanIn Tampa saying my edit of the Phillies article is vandalism. I thought the point of having an online encyclopedia is to present the public with accurate sourced information. When I first edited the article you were condescending, the second time you were even more condescending and said that my edits were unsourced. I sourced them and still my changes were an issue. It is apparent at this point that it's two against one. EaglesFan said that the recent edits were neutral---how can have neutrality on an issue where there is only one accurate side. EaglesFan's sources are a City Paper (Phila area weekly) blog and MLB.com affiliated fan blog. I have sourced and can provide evidence of oficial Phillies memorabilia that say Fightin---stuff going back sixty years. So what I can't understand is how my edits are vandalism but the reversions are cool. Whoever the mediators are I hope they understand that central point. It seems EaglesFan keeps making this an issue (and Killervogel seems to back his opinion) because I had the audacity to change something he contributed. EaglesFan has yet to communicate with me to point out based on evidence presentd by both parties why he is right and I am wrong. he has yet to comment on the evidence I have produced. So far all I've gottenis warnings and snooty remarks. What is the deal? --Thefestooner (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstormers

I like the idea of Lancaster having its uniforms on its page, however, I don't think that it should be the only minor league team to have them. That's the reason.

JaMikePA (talk) 00:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

1943 Philadelphia Phillies season

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1943 Philadelphia Phillies season, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: 1943 Philadelphia Blue Jays season. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Phillies Season Awards

Hey Dude, Do you not find the Rookie of the Year award merited in the comments section for the Phils' 2005 season? Arguably it is a more high profile award than MOY. Was this just an oversight when you corrected my .5 to ½? JesseRafe (talk) 01:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

My bad. It's got to be reformatted, though, to match the rest of the abbreviations and cited properly in the footnotes. Killervogel5 (talk) 03:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I noticed that it was much longer, and thought about making it say ROY to conform, then thought about working on my thesis, and ultimately decided to pore over Utley and Burrell's projected stats and pontificate with my Mets fan roommate about how good our bullpen is. I joined the Wikiproject, I've raised my fair share of shit over there and in various Phillies articles (like one schmuck who kept reverting everyone's addition of Feliz as a Phillie). I think we may have interacted before, as I was an early proponent of trying to get the 125 years of standings off the main page, but just didn't know how to do it purdy like you ended up doing. I'll spice some things up in an ad hoc way when I come across them, let me know if there's anything specific needed. JesseRafe (talk) 05:02, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Why thank you

Hey, thanks for the nice shiny new star. Very much appreciated and put a smile on my face after going through those figures. Just four tiny little fixes and we should be all there. Peanut4 (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Phillies History Section

Ill probably get in my input for it this weekend when I got more time to mull it over. Whammies Were Here 10:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Most kind

Nice to be appreciated :-) Though it's a two-way process – articles improve much more readily when editors and reviewers manage to co-operate with each other. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 23:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Phillies Barnstar

I like it :) Whammies Were Here 10:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:MEDCAB

You have been listed, by me, as an active party in Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-04-14 Philadelphia Phillies. You may want to watch the page. I would appreciate if you said, on the page, who takes what position. Thanks. Mm40|Talk|Sign|Review 12:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Cardinals/Phillies seasons FLs collaboration

What luck and irony that when I decided to search through other MLB team seasons articles to see if any had been worked up to FL status since I had taken St. Louis there, that mere hours earlier the Phillies list you primarily authored was promoted. Congratulations on the recognition for your dedication and hard work! Anyway, the reason I started my search was to see if any newly promoted seasons list had any features that should be added to the Cardinals list to improve it. Therefore, I think we should work together to rectify any differences between our articles and establish a precedent that both the Phillies and Cardinals lists will meet and set for other lists to follow. Points of difference I see are:

  1. The separation of footnotes and citations. Your style is obviously superior here and I plan on following it and editing the Cardinals list to match as soon as possible.
  2. The inclusion of the current season. This has become commonplace with NFL season lists, but not with NHL season lists. I favor not adding a season's record until it is complete, primarily because the alternative would require a daily edit totaling 162+ per season. It's not so big a deal for the NFL, having only 16 games.
  3. The Cardinals list repeats the column headers every 25 years. I did this so that the headings are visible no matter where you are on the long list and think it should be the standard.
  4. Championship highlighting style The Phillies seasons list is the only one I have found that highlights the entire rows as you did, therefore I think the Phillies list should be edited to fit the precedent established throughout sports seasons lists.
  5. The Totals at the end of the lists. The style you used is prevalent throughout sports seasons lists, so I will edit the Cardinals list to match.
  6. Seasons column wikilinks. The Phillies list always links to xxxx in baseball while the Cardinals list links to that from 1882 to 1998, and then links to xxxx Major League Baseball season from 1999 to 2007, which were the only years those articles existed for when I created the Cardinals list. However now MLB season articles exist for every year back to 1876. I'll leave it open to debate whether to link every year to the MLB season or the in baseball season.
  7. The use of Did You Know type footnotes in the Cardinals list. This is really more of a suggestion, but I've been lauded multiple times for the interesting bits they add to the article and even received several suggestions for more during the FL nomination.

Let me know any comments or questions you have on my talk page.Timpcrk87 (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

P.S. I made some small edits to the introduction of Philadelphia Phillies seasons to help the pursuit of perfection.

Wikipedia meetup

As someone who may live or work near Washington D.C., you may be interested - if you've not heard already - about the meetup scheduled for Saturday, May 17th, at Union Station. For details, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4.

You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians in Maryland. Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTM

Congratulations on what appears to be your first WP:FL. In case you do not know, we are running an experiment to choose the List of the Month and Lists of the Day for June. Feel free to nominate your list at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/Nominees/200807 for consideration next month to be the July LOTM or a LOTD. If you would like to support this experiment the most important thing you can do is come by and vote at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200806. My talk page is always open.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination. Please remember to vote at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200806. We need input to make a good selection each month.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Less than 48 hours remain and the voting is close. Your vote at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200806 would be important.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Phillies Game Log

You are welcome. I moved it back because I think it would be easier to keep the game log updated if it is located in the article itself, since it is easy to access. I am glad I was able to help you, because I have noticed that some of the game logs fell behind in terms of updates. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 23:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Why thank you!

Thanks for that Barnstar, I really needed a little wiki-pick-me-up after a dispute earlier today! Ever since I devised that little solution on the Phillies' navbox, I've been trying to apply it to most other teams' (not the Rays' or D-Backs', obviously): a very tedious process. If you're interested, I'd take all the help I can get. It almost makes me want to code an MLB-specific navbox template... almost. -- χγʒ͡ʒγʋᾳ (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:Welcome!

Thanks for the welcome. I can help out all I can, mostly in assessing, copyediting, and wikifying articles. If you need any help, just ask. Regards, RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 06:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago Cubs

That's a great userbox. Can you create the assessment scale and a barnstar?--RyRy5 (talk) 00:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm working on the barnstar right now. Assessment box is beyond my limited mind; maybe you could ask User:Mitico to help out; he did the one for WP:PHILLIES. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 01:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Sure, you can ask him. Do you think you can accept the below:
 Please accept this invite to join the Red Sox WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Red Sox. Simply click here to accept!
Please accept this invite to join the Angels WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles related to the Los Angeles Angels. Simply click here to accept!

--RyRy5 (talk) 01:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:LAA updated

Hello. Since you are part of WP:LAA, you are recieving this message. I gave WP:LAA a new page design, formatting, and more. The project now has it's own request page. Feel free to request there. I also updated our to-do list. I hope you continue to be an active contributer to our project. Please add your opinion on our new revamp of our project at our discussion page. Thank you, from the founder, RyRy5 (talk) 03:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

:)

WikiZorrosign has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Have a great day!WikiZorrosign 11:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Want this? You earned it. WikiZorrosign 15:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Award moved to this page. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 16:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Hello, Killervogel5. You have new messages at RyRy5's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--RyRy5 (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Please visit WP:PHILLIES.--RyRy5 (talk) 19:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:CUBS

Hey! Sorry to butt in, but I read your comment on RyRy5's talk page. I wanted to let you know that I made those edits and redesigned the page! If there's any other page you'd like me to make similar edits to, I'd be happy to help! WikiZorrosign 19:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

On the Cubs Userbox, could we make the 0059BC border ff0000 (for the red in the cubs colors)? WikiZorrosign 21:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Cubs barnstar

I have left a message at the project talk page, but the barnstar you created doen't work with text in it. Looking at the Cubs and Phillies WikiProject (the one you modeled on) barnstars, the codes are different. Can you please fix the code? I really like the design to the barnstar, it just needs to be fixed.--LAAFan 15:13, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

5/28 DYK

Updated DYK query On 28 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article History of the Philadelphia Phillies, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford Pray 02:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Phillies attendance

But I heard it on the radio. Over 94,000 spectators. It is true!

Smuckers (talk) 02:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Redirecting?

You seem to know alot about wikipedia, so I'll ask you. If there is a page, how do you redirect incorrect/similar phrases to redirect to the correct page? I've tried #REDIRECT [[Insert text]] but it doesn't work it just comes up red.

Example: Typing in Kevin Love. It used to go into the disambig. page, but now it redirects to Kevin Love (basketball) and says "if you're looking for the nascar driver, see ...etc". How did they do that? What do they type? Thnks.

Smuckers (talk) 16:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Smile

Smuckers (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks

I look forward to being a new contributor to the newsletter of the weekly games! Lemme know when you want it started! PBAbowler300 (talk) 00:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Cleaned up refs

Since your one of WP:PHILLIES's active contributers, I just wanted to show the cleanup I did to the Philadelphia Phillies article. -- RyRy5 (talk) 01:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed you did like, 50 edits to that page recently and I was guessing you missed those. I decided to clean those up. I am part of the WP:PHILLIES. ;) -- RyRy5 (talk) 03:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Phillies Peer Review

Glad to help - I will take a look at it over the next few days. I suspectred with a username like Killervogel you might know German, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I had to learn my German the hard way (in school) Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Los Angeles Angels

No standings in any publication use the entire official name for the Angels. It makes the table look ugly frankly to have it spelled out in full. I'm not saying don't use the official name in the Angels article, but I don't think its necessary in the standings. --FancyMustard (talk) 22:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough, I definitely agree that they should still be the Anaheim Angels too. --FancyMustard (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

The Philadelphia Phillies

Will they win the world series?

Smuckers (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


To each his own

Sorry still think it's OK..people write about future events all the time, don't see why this should be any different.


From,

Smuckers (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes OK I am over it but I have an off topic question what does "Save" mean in Phillies box (next to attendance)

From,

Smuckers (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTM reminder

User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200807 is underway.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 08:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

You have nominated an article at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200807 and have not yet voted. Voting runs through June 20.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Chad Durbin's page

Why did you edit the addition to Durbin's page? He is blogging on Prolebrity.com and I thought it was relevent to people interested in him.

Seanbesser (talk) 18:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Blogs are not reputable sources. In addition, the term prolebrity is a neologism, which Wikipedia does not cover. This means it is a term which will not or has not yet gained wide use. These edits to the pages of each player using this blog site may easily be construed as advertising, also forbidden in Wikipedia articles. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 19:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


From Sean to KV5: It is Chad's personal blog though. How is Chad talking about things that interest him not reputable with respect to himself? That doesn't make any sense. As a fan, I want to be able to find an athlete's personal website and/or blog if he has them. Seanbesser (talk) 17:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Greg Dobbs

Basically what I did was delete the whole article in order to purge some libellous edits made by an anonymous IP. Once those edits are purged they won't show up in the history anymore and can't be seen by editors (except admins). Unfortunately in order to purge some edits one has to temporarily delete the whole article and then restore it, and that will show up on watch lists and be somewhat confusing. I hope this explains things! ... discospinster talk 02:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


Baseball Improvement Drive

I think I got everything worked out. Would you mind taking a look and seeing if it makes sense? You're welcome to nominate the first article if you would like to. Blackngold29 03:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

The only socks I know anything about are Red Sox and White Sox. Still, that IP had me worried. I'm still waiting for the RFCU, to be sure I'm not someone else's sockpuppet. I live several hundred miles from that other user, but he might be using a matter transporter to beam over here and mess with my PC while I'm away from it. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 20:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I found a pretty good matter transporter at Wal*Mart for under $100. It's made by a company called Acme, so I'm sure it's top quality. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 16:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Newsletter

Sure. If you take a Sox newsletter like this one and change around the colors, articles, dates, etc. and anything else you want to change you should arrive at a Phillies newsletter, if that makes sense. If not, I'll try to be more specific.   jj137 (talk) 20:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

'Stormers retired

The Barnstormers did not announce a press release, nor is the no. displayed at the Clip. The JR no. is listed as all pro teams retired the number. Nellie Fox is retired with Baltimore, not Lancaster. I'm not being a jerk, but there is not any source for your info. JaMikePA (talk) 17:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Phillies

No problem, I plan on adding awards to a bunch of other players within the next couple of days--Yankees10 20:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Killervogel5/Archive_1&oldid=1146643320"