User talk:Khateli20

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Khateli20!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Ravensfire (talk) 23:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barbie Forteza, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 11:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Barbie Forteza, you may be blocked from editing. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:26, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jak Roberto. Stop adding something that is a not a widely used nickname. Follow - WP:BRD, you've been reverted, start a discussion on the article talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 04:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why? I have source that Jak Roberto is dubbed as a "Pambansang abs." Why are you keep deleting it? Are you one of the bashers of Jak? 🙄 Khateli20 (talk) 05:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia includes nicknames when they are widely used, not mentioned by a couple of sources here and there. It's just WP:TRIVIA at this point. Please use the article talk page to discuss and get consensus before adding it back. Ravensfire (talk) 13:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jak Roberto. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Follow WP:BRD - we don't use casual nicknames, especially in the lead. Discuss on the article talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Khateli20 you haven't bothered to actually discuss this, and certainly not on the article talk page where you should have started one some days ago - I've gone ahead and started the discussion at Talk:Jak_Roberto#Nicknames. Please STOP reverting and let's find a consensus. This is well into WP:EDITWAR territory which is not helpful. Follow WP:BRD, work with the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia and make the article better. Ravensfire (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jak Roberto. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Same issue, seriously, read WP:BRD and discuss this on the talk page section I've started. Next step is going to be WP:3RR for edit-warring. Let's not go there, please. Ravensfire (talk) 13:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shut up basher! Khateli20 (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jak Roberto. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Enough - stop reverting, use the talk page discussion to seek consensus. The next revert will result in a report at WP:EWN for your edit-warring. Come on - this is a simple request about something that's required in a collaborative project like Wikipedia - TALK when there's a dispute. Use discussion. Ravensfire (talk) 14:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Jak Roberto) for Poorly sourced additions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. [1] is clearly you. Don't do that. It's block evasion and can get you completely blocked from editing Wikipedia. If needed, I'll simply ask the page be semi-protected from IP edits as well. Ravensfire (talk) 03:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Puzzle of the Murder[edit]

Hello, Khateli20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Puzzle of the Murder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Puzzle of the Murder[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Puzzle of the Murder, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you recently removed content from David Licauco without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Waxworker (talk) 14:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]