User talk:KerryBlue1852

September 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to St. Michael's College School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 14:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at St. Michael's College School, you may be blocked from editing. Your most recent edit looks like whitewashing. At any rate, it was unexplained, and you've been asked before to provide edit summaries, and it removed reliable secondary sourcing, which is destructive to the article. It is easy to think that you have a conflict of interest with the school, which you should disclose: see WP:COI. If you continue editing in a disruptive manner you are likely to get blocked from editing the article directly. Drmies (talk) 14:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at St. Michael's College School. Stop doing this. You are removing the existing sources, and the request for additional sourcing Meters (talk) 20:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard

Hello. Despite repeated warnings you have continued to remove well-sourced information in what appears to be an attempt at whitewashing the article for St. Michael's College School. I have restored the information to the article — you should not remove it again; this would be vandalism. I have also opened a discussion on the Administators' noticeboard about your editing. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 11:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing St. Michael's College School for for persistent disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hammersoft (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, KerryBlue1852. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page St. Michael's College School, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)