User talk:Kensai97

Welcome![edit]

Hi Kensai97! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trojan Horse Hoax[edit]

See [1] and World News Daily Report. Why the media is falling for this I have no idea. Doug Weller talk 19:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Thank you kindly. I was wondering why I didn't see it in any very major US sources, but did see it on three or four different generally reliable (or at least non-satirical) sources, but hadn't found anything about it being fake until now, so. Kensai97 (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. It's pretty disappointing. I mentioned it at WP:FTN and found out about the source at the Fraudulent Archaeology Facebook page. Doug Weller talk 20:15, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Pinchme123 (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I saw the other message you had left as well and wasn't sure if I had indeed done something wrong based on the wording there, but information is always good since I'm maybe not 'new' I will admit I don't do a whole lot on Wikipedia. Anyway, will give a response on the talk page in question later, since I'm running around today (thankfully not for shopping though). I hope you had a Happy Thanksgiving and, if going out and about yourself, you get some good deals and are mauled less badly than you'd otherwise expect by the shopping mobs today (and only because not getting mauled at all is too much to wish for unless it's drastically changed in the last 5 years). Kensai97 (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]