User talk:Kashi Narain Mishra

This is Kashi Narain Mishra's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review WP:YFA and WP:MOS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kashi Narain Mishra/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kashi Narain Mishra! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 06:18, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kashi Narain Mishra/sandbox[edit]

You may want to see WP:INTREF2 for a guide on how to much more easily make references. It essentially consists of using <ref></ref> tags like this.^[1] Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 01:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ I'm a reference

Concern regarding User:Kashi Narain Mishra/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Kashi Narain Mishra. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Kashi Narain Mishra/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Kashi Narain Mishra/sandbox[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Kashi Narain Mishra/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your letter conveying the 'speedy deletion' of my article. I also wish that Wikipedia should be a book of knowledge and reference and not merely a book of tale-telling. You must be having a distinguished panel of linguists and historians. Let them decide on the following matters.

1. Antiquity of two sister languages - Sanskrit and Greek. Words and languages are human creations. These two languages have common root of words, forms of grammar and mode of expression. Was it possible before the time of Alexander the Great ?

2. Megasthenes, the most celebrated and contemporary of Alexander, clearly admits that Alexander had gone to Maharashtra region and Gangetic plain region. Does it not nullify the theory of Alexander's death at Babylon ?

3.Megasthenes does not tell anything about Alexander's death at Babylon though he lived for a long time in India after the presumed death of Alexander.

4. Who are different Greek invaders, like Heracles, Dionysus, Bacchus and Alexander. Are these all the names of one single man who is popularly known as Alexander the Great ? Were these all different men , who invaded India , when the name of India was unknown to the Greeks. Alexander and Dionysos- both are described as the son of Zeus and must be contemporaries.

5. Has the art of history writing emerged all of a sudden or it has the story of gradual development by trying different methods for preserving historical events.

6. Can we find the trace of innumerable towns that Alexander had set up ?

7. When Alexander the Great had reached Ganges, why the so called Ashokan pillars, should not be treated as the pillars of Alexander, which precisely match the description given about the pillars of Alexander.

8. Why did Alexander return from India when he had started his journey to conquer the world ?

These and many other factors should be kept in mind while writing about Alexander the Great. Kashi Narain Mishra (talk) 03:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

.................. ......... ................. Kashi Narain Mishra (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Appears to be original research (opinion) - see Wikipedia:No original research

KylieTastic (talk) 13:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Topic.[edit]

Indian invasion of Alexander the Great , has been written largely on the basis of Greek and Roman texts. Indian sources have been fully overlooked. It is the time for getting an insight from Indian sources. The whole Sanskrit literature should be explored in this respect and particularly the Mahabharat. It will make clear the unpredictable decision of Alexander, to return home in a haste. 14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)~ 14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)~ 14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC) Kashi Narain Mishra (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I'm a reference

[1]