User talk:Kanaye
|
Welcome to my talk page
Please post new messages to the bottom of the talk page (e.g. by clicking here). In addition, please use headlines when starting new talk topics, and please sign and date your entries. I will respond on your talk page, unless you specify otherwise. Thank you.
Flippin eck - not again...
I am sick to the back teeth of this nonsense. Here we go, yet again:
Something is going to have to be done about these persistant edit warriors. --Mais oui! 07:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Scotch warriors
Right, I've had a quick look over the revised article, good stuff, and I have the following comments...
- It's weird having the first citation in the text as number [4] - it's because you've added citations within the infobox. Not usually a problem but because of the formatting, the first ref you see is [4]. So.... I know I recommended citing those stats on highs and lows within rankings, perhaps you can add a performance section (hey - a graph of rankings throughout the past decades?) and then cite it there? Picky, but then the peer review was after FA-style comments!
- The crest & Archie Gemmill's goal will need a fair use rationale added to the image page.
- ...disastrous defeat... is a bit POV - why disastrous?
- I'm still not sure what makes the players in the list "notable". Is it a subjective list or have you applied objective criteria to this list? Check out the List of Arsenal F.C. players which is a featured list and has some good explanation as to why certain individuals have been picked out. A lot of football club articles simply migrate this information to a sub-page (like Arsenal) where you can explain how people were selected.
- Goalscorers, caps are sortable, I'd be consistent and do the same for the managers (for suitable columns, e.g. W,D,L,%win)
- WP:DASH suggests that you ought to seperate years using an en-dash, so instead of 1955-56, you should use 1955–56.
- It's not essential but I'd consider creating (at least a stub) article for Dawson Walker.
Hope that all helps. Let me know the moment you take this to FAC or if there's anything else I can do to help you out. All the best The Rambling Man 16:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
(The) Tartan Army
Hi
Article titles, because they tend to be listed alphabetically, do not normally include the definite article. In real life, everyone says, 'the Tartan Army'. The only time I have heard otherwise is from people who are not fluent speakers of English and tend to leave out articles before nouns.
Also, if you click on the article in question, you will see that it defines 'the Tartan Army' as the travelling fans of the Scotland rugby union and football teams and makes no mention of the name being applied to the actual team. This makes it appear that the Scotland team page is giving out false information.
Rectifying that situation (if you can find a good source for 'the Tartan Army' being used for the Team rather than the fans) might be a better use of your time than specious quibbles about the use of the word "the"
Thank you,
81.145.242.88 19:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the lesson. Kanaye 21:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Kanaye, as a WikiProject Scotland participant, please check out this this thread and consider adding the bot results page to your watchlist so we can manually update the New Articles page. There are some false results for the first batch, but I'm sure we can collectively tune the rules to improve the output.
If we get enough people watching the results page, we'll be cooking with gas as they say :) This looks like a great helper in finding new Scotland related material. Cheers. --Cactus.man ✍ 01:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Would you be willing to add your support to the nomination of Derry City F.C. for FA status? Cheers. Danny InvincibleTalk|Edits 18:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Germany shirt logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Germany shirt logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 07:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
FAC
My very best wishes with the FAC. You have done a tremendous job with this and many other related articles. I will not be contributing to the discussion as I am not up to speed on FA criteria, nor on that particular topic, but you may want to ask User:Golbaltraveller, who has got at least 2 Scotland-related articles past FA, and also done some outstanding work in several others, eg. Economy of Scotland.
Are you knowlegdeable about other sports? Our Sport in Scotland article could do with a lot of work, especially benchmarking against other good "Sport in x" articles, and of course refs and images. Cheers. --Mais oui! 16:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of SNP MPs and current Scottish MPs cats
Could you have a look at this CFD nomination. It has been up for a week, and only 3 people have commented on it (amazingly). Could you please consider the discussion and contribute, because it would be a bit pathetic if this CFD were closed with almost zero comment. --Mais oui! 17:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Tartan Army
Hi,
It is not a question of "threatening" anything: I am prepared to be influenced by reasoned discussion. What I will not put up with is being deleted without discussion by someone who thinks that they own a certain article.
As for "spamming" your page, I put to you a dilemma that I currently have with regard to the necessity of sourcing the phrase, 'the Tartan Army'. Since you rejected "the Bravehearts" as a nickname, presumably on the grounds that the source was inadequate, my purpose in sending the evidence that I could find was:
(a) To see if any of the sources for the Tartan Army would meet with your standards
(b) To illustrate that it is not easy to find a single rock-solid source for an unofficial nickname
I guess I mistook you for someone who actually gives a damn!
The evidence for "the Bravehearts" is on the Discussion Page and I am awaiting user feedback before taking any further action on it.
You seriously need to get your attitude sorted out.
Regards,
Flonto 21:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I was too late! Some other sod was bolder than me. My nickname is Chickenheart.
Flonto 16:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Braveheart Edits
(repeated from your Golfer45 account)
I will offer you the opportunity to immediately revert your latest edit as Kanaye, as it's presence constitutes a 3RR violation. You have been advised to bring your content issues to the Discussion page and wait before instituting them. Your behavior is relatively uncivil, and I would ask that you ponder the deleterious effect that has on cooperative editing. Arcayne (cast a spell) 16:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Let's try to go through them one by one. If that doesn't work, we can always go through 3rd opinion in a bit. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 20:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Let's work this out using my talk page, as going back and forth may confuse matters. Go ahead and watchlist mine for a bit. :) - Arcayne (cast a spell) 14:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Template:East of Scotland Football League
Your recent edit to the template has broken it in the member clubs' articles. When you get a chance, please add {{fb start}} and {{fb end}} to either side of the template in these articles to remedy the problem. Thanks. - Dudesleeper · Talk 09:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:David Weir Kirin Cup.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:David Weir Kirin Cup.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Redirects, such as in Craig Thomson (referee) article
Hi. Read the Manual of Style back to front. There is no need to avoid redirects, what you are doing is a waste of energy. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 19:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
:Hi again. We are both wrong to trust a Wikipedia article as an authoritative source for giving the "correct title". The Wikipedia article is not written by those who necessarily know. Those who necessarily know are more likely to be members of the staff of the Scottish Football League. And those members of the staff of the Scottish Football League who contribute to the official website prefer to call it (e.g. in the latest 2006/07 competition) this, not "Scottish Challenge Cup", as you claim. So, in my opinion, not only should the reference to it in Craig Thomson (referee) be reverted again, but the article should be changed to Scottish Football League Challenge Cup, with a redirect from the current page at Scottish Challenge Cup and also from Scottish League Challenge Cup. Or can you not see this? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts. Thanks once again. Ref (chew)(do) 21:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
::My thoughts haven't really changed on this. BTW, I did not revert last time round - I changed the display name as per the Scottish Football League website being my reliable source, but have left your Wikilink alone as you wish. Having contributed significantly to the recent development of the article, without owning it of course, I am disappointed that we have to differ so spectacularly over a very minor point in the makeup of the piece. You will have noticed my post to the talk page for Scottish Challenge Cup, inspired by our recent discussions. This may illustrate how strongly I feel about editors believing their righteousness outweighs their duty to check facts and sources (no accusation intended in your case, as you have stayed civil throughout, but other editors have been plain blinkered and stubborn over issues like this in the past).
::On your next point: whoever said that WikiProject Football articles should have a title which includes a sponsor, such as Clydesdale Bank? That's a totally different matter, and I would like us to concentrate on football-related contexts rather than bring outside influences to bear. Scottish Premier League equals Scottish Football League, as Sponsorname Scottish Premier League equals Sponsorname Scottish Football League - your comparison is not on an even football field in this instance.
::When there is a posting of consensus by editors to Talk:Scottish Challenge Cup, the future of the prose in use in other connected articles, and the associated Wikilinks therein will become clearer, and we'll know how to proceed. Thanks for the interesting exchanges so far. Ref (chew)(do) 23:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Noted your quotation of the naming conventions policy for Wikipedia, and I therefore withdraw from this discussion, having also struck on the Talk:Scottish Challenge Cup page, and reverted to your usage in the Craig Thomson (referee) article. Thanks for your exchange of views, and for clarifying the guideline for me. Best wishes. Ref (chew)(do) 23:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Troll
That IP troll that Wangi has blocked has been about for 2-3 months now, eg:
User:Barryob thinks that he is just yet another incarnation of uber-sockpuppeteer User:Mallimak, but I have not seen any evidence yet for that myself. --Mais oui! 04:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Scotland team FAC
Ack, I've been quite busy of late. Can you give me till the weekend to look it over? Sorry for mucking you about like this. Thanks. Qwghlm 22:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Posted as a reply on my own talk page. BM. "Yes, 'anglos' are players based in England. In the past there was discussion about the relative merits of said players in the international team. If you got to http://www.geograph.org.uk/browse.php?p=595335 and choose the image you want I'll upload it for you. Ben MacDui (Talk) 19:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)"
Replaceable fair use Image:SPL_trophy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SPL_trophy.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 03:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use disputed for Image:David Weir Kirin Cup.png
Thanks for uploading Image:David Weir Kirin Cup.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris B • talk • contribs 13:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Jim_Baxter_Wembley.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jim_Baxter_Wembley.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 10:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:East fife fc.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:East fife fc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Scottish Premier League logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Scottish Premier League logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Scottish league cup.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Scottish league cup.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Scotland team review
Scotland national football team has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Domiy (talk) 08:51, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Duplicate Image:Kit Rosebery kit left.png
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Kit Rosebery kit left.png, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Kit Rosebery kit left.png is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Kit Rosebery kit left.png, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Image listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kit left arm hibs left.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 09:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Scottish Amateur FA.gif)
You've uploaded File:Scottish Amateur FA.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Scottish Football League.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Scottish Football League.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Scotland flag border.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scotland flag border.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Gordon Smith SFA.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Gordon Smith SFA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland
I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
File:EU location map SCO.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EU location map SCO.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 09:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.
File:Kit left arm Rosebery kit left.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kit left arm Rosebery kit left.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Kit body Rosebery kit.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Kit right arm Rosebery kit right.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)