User talk:KG IT 7143

July 2023[edit]

Hello, KG IT 7143, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sirs, thank you for the messages, yesterday I created one account and I got complants for using country codes. I was planning to rename the account but I took me long time to understand and also mentioned there takes long time to update. At a same time I found that I can not update until I received new rename account. So, I created new account without any contry code. This is my first time in wikipedia and I got misunderstood, it is not my intention. KG IT 7143 (talk) 14:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KG IT 7143. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KG IT 7143. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KG IT 7143|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sirs, thank you again for the message. Regarding the nature that you mentioned, acutally I was following the news and and their social media from last 5-6 months. When I came to wiki, I found that there was wrong informaiton listed in the key people (Jamuna gurung). So I tired to updated it voluntraly. Regarding Direct articles editing, I am new in wiki so I will go through all of the terms that you mentioned here. KG IT 7143 (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Himalaya Jet. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:33, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Lourdes 06:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for Wikipedia Account Block Due to Misunderstanding

Dear Sirs,

I am writing to appeal the indefinite block on my account, which I understand was imposed due to suspicion of being a sockpuppet created to violate Wikipedia policy. I assure you that I had no intention of using multiple accounts for illegitimate reasons, and I deeply regret any confusion my actions may have caused.

My sole purpose in editing the page was to correct misinformation that I noticed about the key person associated with HIMALAYA JET. The page incorrectly listed Jamuna Gurung as the owner, whereas the real owner is Dipendra Gurung MoID. Additionally, I observed that the hyperlinks meant for Dipendra Gurung MoID & Gurung family were mistakenly attributed to Jamuna Gurung.

As a newcomer to Wikipedia, I might have made errors in editing, but my intention was always to contribute positively and provide accurate information to improve the page's content. I genuinely believe that having the correct information is crucial for the integrity and reliability of Wikipedia as a platform.

Regarding the use of multiple accounts, I acknowledge that I created a new account after receiving complaints about my use of a country code in my previous account. I had no intention of evading any bans or blocks but solely created the new account to adhere to the guidelines and avoid any potential issues.

I understand that my account may have been blocked as a precautionary measure, but I assure you that my intentions were not malicious or commercial. I have no further need to edit the concerned page; however, I kindly request you to verify and amend the misinformation I mentioned above to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the content.

I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding that has occurred, and I promise to be more cautious and mindful of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in the future. If you find it in your hearts to reconsider the block on my account, I would be immensely grateful for a chance to contribute constructively to Wikipedia once again.

Thank you for your understanding and consideration.

Sincerely,

KG IT 7143 KG IT 7143 (talk) 10:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KG IT 7143 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Sirs, ::I am writing to appeal the indefinite block on my account, which I understand was imposed due to suspicion of being a sockpuppet created to violate Wikipedia policy. I assure you that I had no intention of using multiple accounts for illegitimate reasons, and I deeply regret any confusion my actions may have caused. ::My sole purpose in editing the page was to correct misinformation that I noticed about the key person associated with HIMALAYA JET. The page incorrectly listed Jamuna Gurung as the owner, whereas the real owner is Dipendra Gurung MoID. Additionally, I observed that the hyperlinks meant for Dipendra Gurung MoID & Gurung family were mistakenly attributed to Jamuna Gurung. ::As a newcomer to Wikipedia, I might have made errors in editing, but my intention was always to contribute positively and provide accurate information to improve the page's content. I genuinely believe that having the correct information is crucial for the integrity and reliability of Wikipedia as a platform. ::Regarding the use of multiple accounts, I acknowledge that I created a new account after receiving complaints about my use of a country code in my previous account. I had no intention of evading any bans or blocks but solely created the new account to adhere to the guidelines and avoid any potential issues. ::I understand that my account may have been blocked as a precautionary measure, but I assure you that my intentions were not malicious or commercial. I have no further need to edit the concerned page; however, I kindly request you to verify and amend the misinformation I mentioned above to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the content. ::I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding that has occurred, and I promise to be more cautious and mindful of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in the future. If you find it in your hearts to reconsider the block on my account, I would be immensely grateful for a chance to contribute constructively to Wikipedia once again. ::Thank you for your understanding and consideration. ::Sincerely, :: KG IT 7143 (talk) 17:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:52, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.