User talk:JoyceChee

User:JoyceChee[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:JoyceChee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of User:JoyceChee and leave a note on [[Talk:User:JoyceChee|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:JoyceChee[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:JoyceChee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

second verse, same as the first (recently deleted and user reincarnated SPAM page)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:JoyceChee|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 20:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:JoyceChee[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:JoyceChee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

SPAM is still SPAM, no matter how many cans of it you open (3rd incarnation of this same SPAM userpage today

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:JoyceChee|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:JoyceChee/Sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:JoyceChee/Sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

SPAM Is still SPAM, even when you bury the SPAM in your sandbox (...do they make SPAM flavored peel n taste strips??)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:JoyceChee/Sandbox|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:SKYY and Fusion Pouchs.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SKYY and Fusion Pouchs.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage[edit]

Wikipedia may not be the right place for what you want to do. We have notability standards and userpage standards. Try MyWikiBiz, which may be the best place for an article about the product. hmwith τ 21:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoyceChee. You have new messages at Wuhwuzdat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome[edit]

Hello, JoyceChee, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —David Levy 22:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting your own work[edit]

If you are the only editor for a page, you can add {{db-g7}} to the top and it will be deleted. "db-g7" tells administrators that the author and sole contributor wants the page deleted.

For pictures, if it's not in use anywhere you can probably do the same, but it will take a week to get deleted.

As for File:Tablewiki.png you could delete the information box and replace it with {{db-f5}}. db-f5 tells administrators that the image is not a "free licensed" picture and that it is not in use as a fair-use image. Since your picture contains artwork that looks like a company logo, it's almost certainly not a "free license" image, and if it were to stay it would have to have a fair-use rationale for each use. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 22:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]