User talk:Jon Çobani

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello Jon Çobani, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Jon Çobani, good luck, and have fun.Dustin (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your efforts to add references to this page; we appreciate it. However, the distinction between military (armed forces) special forces units and law enforcement special forces units may not have been clear. There is a whole page at List of special law enforcement units, which is where I have moved RENEA and "The Eagles". Hope this is clear. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 04:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw you reverted my edit on the Albanian ID card.

The Serbians write on their website that Albanian IDs aren't accepted. [1]

If you pick an EU country in the list, or Bosnia or Montenegro or Macedonia, it says "ID card can also be used to travel to Serbia". Not when choosing Albania

Are you from the region (Serbia or Albania)? If so, do you have any other source besides that article that Albanians can sue their IDs? André Devecserii (talk) 11:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Please don't use insults and attack editors in your edit summaries, as you did here [2]. This is extremely incivil. Athenean (talk) 23:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of my edit on Albania-Croatia relations[edit]

Hello, I noticed you reverted my edit on the Albania-Croatia relations page, as seen here. I am not sure as to what wrongs I may have done, as you didn't provide a reason for doing so in the edit summary. Part of my edit was focused on improving the grammatical structure, although I believe the part you took issue with was the one I put on the article's talk page. In hindsight I probably should have raised the topic and waiting for discussion before removing it as per Wikipedia's etiquette but from my perspective the cited article did not explicitly or implicitly mention the two countries' history of defense pacts or their relationship, which falls under the original research category. If you could give a reason as to why you reverted my edit I would greatly appreciate it. Zupotachyon (talk) 23:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


You also removed actual info about the Ethnic Albanians which fought in Croatia, and the most prominent of them being Agim Çeku. --Jon Çobani (talk) 02:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a part that mentioned the two countries' history of defense pacts and their relationship because the cited source did not explicitly or implicitly mention this. I do not happen to see where I removed the information you are referring to, as those points were not present in the text or in the cited source. I hope I have not missed them by accident, but if I have, do you mind pointing them out to me? Regards, Zupotachyon (talk) 06:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored my grammatical corrections only, as they don't affect the meaning of the article. I have not removed the (what appears to me) disputed content. I haven't seen any further response from you, so perhaps I was not clear in my explanation? Tell me if I was unclear, I will try to elaborate. From what I see you haven't edited recently so maybe you haven't had the time to respond yet. Regards, Zupotachyon (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, no you are clear I didn't have the time to respond --Jon Çobani (talk) 22:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

O Shoku pse e ndyshon te dhenat e pasakta qe un i heq tek tema? Shqiperia nuk ka Nexter dhe as shume gjera te tjera aty. Nuk ke te drejt ti dhe askush me vene te dhena te rreme duke keqinformuar te tjeret. Vendos referenca te sakta nese ke informacion, mos me detyro te raportoj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albania1991 (talkcontribs) 23:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Dr.K.. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Dr. K. 02:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


You are the one personally attacking me, you can revert the edits but the messages are still there, Dr. Kostandinopoja.

Edit: I literally did https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Staying_cool_when_the_editing_gets_hot#How_to_cope, section nr.2 Jon Çobani (talk) 02:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Jon Çobani. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jon Çobani. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

47.219.237.179 (talk) 20:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]