User talk:Jojhutton/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Walt Disney Parks and Resorts

I thought I should tell you, although you may know, that the measles outbreak incident is included in the article Incidents at Disneyland Resort and is more accurately stated as I read it. I think it is germane to that article and I would not see a reason to delete or amend it, taking for granted that the article itself is notable. I mentioned to the editor in a later message that my main problem with the edit was that it was inaccurate. The legislature did not introduce a vaccination requirement as a result of the incident, but simply restricted or made more difficult exemptions to the existing requirement. I also said that I saw a more accurate statement in the Incidents article and that the measles outbreak and consequence was more germane to that article; as I noted in my edit summary, it did not appear germane to the Parks and Resorts article. Donner60 (talk) 10:32, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Just to fill you in, the edit that you reverted is from an obvious sock puppet of Curse of Fenric. I was going to revert it before you did. So Thanks.--JOJ Hutton 10:56, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Wow. I didn't realize that. If I had, I probably would not have bothered to leave a somewhat detailed explanation and somewhat sympathetic message though I might have still left a brief explanation because of the face appearance of the edit and source. Donner60 (talk) 22:40, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
@Jojhutton and @Donner60: I don't know whether to say "unfortunately" or "fortunately", but the SPI came back negative to GhostLight being Curse. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp 00:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. That makes me feel a little better because I thought I had been taken in by sock and that seems not to be the case. Donner60 (talk) 00:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Check user is just one way to weed out sock puppets, but just because a SPI check comes back negative does not automatically mean that the account is not a sock puppet. As the other two ip edits were determined to be from "static" addresses, meaning that the edits were most likely from smart phones, it's easy to come to the conclusion that GhostLight edited the same way. Those types of edits are very hard to link. GhostLight was blocked anyway. JOJ Hutton 01:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
I am glad you are on top of this. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 10:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Request uninvolved opinion

Hello, Jojhutton. I hope you are well! I tend to look forward to a chance to work again with an editor with whom things didn't work out together the first time, in the hopes that good faith resolves itself the second time. Do you have a moment to offer an uninvolved opinion? You are one of two editors to whom I have made this request (I believe I am involved at this point). Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Public Storage/1. It's a fairly short article about an American company. Thanks for considering it! Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Ohio State University

I agree that the official name of the school includes "The" as is the case with many other schools. As this is part of the proper noun, I agree it should be capitalized. However, the format on the Wikipedia pages for other schools does not include "The" as part of the bold text so I don't see why it should be included on this page even though their official names also include "The." I using one standard format makes more sense than arbitrarily having this page different than the others hence my edit earlier. The OSU Wikipedia page emphasizes that the name was officially changed to "The Ohio State University" but The State University of Iowa was also changed to The University of Iowa in 1964 and that Wikipedia page has the same format as the other "University of statename" pages. Either a lot of updating should be done to bring other schools into your desired format for the OSU page or the OSU page should join them. Medicalmiller (talk) 03:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

First and foremost, there is Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. Second, there has been a long standing consensus with this article to have this in the lead. It has been debated and discussed before. Third, you use the argument that other articles don't do this, but in fact some article do, Pennsylvania State University and Rutgers University. And when it comes down to it, those articles should also be in bold. I'm not sure why they are not.--JOJ Hutton 13:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

Truman in 1952

He most certainly did run! From his article: "Truman had hoped to recruit General Eisenhower as a Democratic candidate, but found him more interested in seeking the Republican nomination. Accordingly, Truman let his name be entered in the New Hampshire primary by supporters. The highly unpopular Truman was handily defeated by Kefauver; 18 days later the president announced he would not seek a second full term." KarlFrei (talk) 14:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm well aware of that happening. However, if that is the criteria you wish to use, then you seem to ignore the fact that Johnson also participated in a few of the early primaries. So that would make your edit incorrect no matter what. JOJ Hutton 14:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
I am sorry that I am not an expert on US political history. In this case, it would seem that the article should refer to Johnson instead of Truman, of course. KarlFrei (talk) 08:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
It shouldn't refer to either because neither man lost a reelection bid. Hoover was the last one.--JOJ Hutton 10:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

This Thursday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center in LA on October 15! (drop-in any time, 10am-4pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

Seriously? Seriously???

I've spent hours over the last several weeks working on Jedediah Smith, which was in dismal shape when I started. You make no effort to assist, and yet 10 minutes after I put something in you don't like, you start edit warring over it? I like it, it's not hurting anything, and you're just making up your own rules: "Must have a reliable source stating that the producers of the film based the character on him. Otherwise it's trivia." So, indulge me. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

You've made many outstanding edits. That's great. I only removed a single arbitrary edit that is missing a reliable source and is completely false. Sorry you take offense to this. I wasn't trying to disparage your entire work. That said, you may need to become familiar with a few standard policies and guidelines we like to adhere to on the Wikipedia. They are WP:OR and WP:RS which are both core content policies. Anything that violates a core content policy should be and can removed. Also read WP:OWN, WP:BRD, WP:Consensus, and WP:3RR. Thanks. JOJ Hutton 21:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
I'm very familiar with the core concepts "you" like to adhere to on the Wikipedia. They are very open to interpretation. You are interpreting them to say "Must have a reliable source stating that the producers of the film based the character on him. Otherwise it's trivia," Really? The producers have to say it? Wouldn't that be the writer? You're making up your own standard. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 21:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes, that should be clear. The edit states that the character was based on JS, but where is the proof? There is no source for this at all. Unless there is a source, the claim shouldn't be made on wikipedia. That's how false information gets started. Wp articles are written using reliable secondary sources, not other wikis that anyone with an email address can edit. JOJ Hutton 21:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
There is no claim being made about the veracity of the statement, just that it's being made. That is a fact. Now, if I had made an edit that stated that Jed Smith was an alien sent to earth to wipe out the beaver, maybe you would be justified in insisting on better sources. But, that a character with the same name in a comedy movie is said to be based on him? The death of Wikipedia is going to be due to arguing over pissy little stuff like this. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Find a better source because it violates the core content policies of this site. Don't like the policies, then get them changed, otherwise the policies need to be adhered to. Also you said that you are aware of WP:BRD. So why did you not follow this guideline? You made a bold edit and I reverted it. You should not have simply reinserted it without discussion. These guidelines are there to help with disputes, but you seem to be willing to edit war over this detail. The information you entered is not only false, but it's misleading and without a reliable source. JOJ Hutton 22:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
BRD is a guideline, not a policy. I was the one who had been making all the edits on the article, it was your responsibility to be civil and start the discussion if there was something you had an issue with. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 22:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
I called it a guideline. And I think you truly are unaware of how the Wikipedia editing process works. You don't get a free pass to add whatever you wish without being reverted every now and then simply because you made all of the edits. It is not my responsibility in a conflict dispute to begin a discussion. You added the content, it's up to you to get consensus, especially if you want to add false information without a reliable source. JOJ Hutton 22:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Once again, it was not a false statement. I said that it was "said" and it had a source saying it. It was a qualified statement, but not a false one. BRD also states that the practice is supposed to be used judiciously. Your revert, especially the second one, was not judicious. Yes, it was your responsibility to start the discussion. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 22:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Well it is false because the character is not based on the historical figure, no matter what some editor on another wiki says. And yes, BRD clearly states that if your edit is reverted, DO NOT REVERT AGAIN. You reverted again. You failed to follow the BRD process which has become a very standard practice on Wikipedia and is there to help alleviate edit wars. You don't have a consensus to add this so it shouldn't be included in the article.JOJ Hutton 22:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
"Well it is false because the character is not based on the historical figure, no matter what some editor on another wiki says." Okay, provide evidence for that, and I'll be happy to remove it. Or, better yet, add that evidence to the article to explain the controversy. But, you don't have consensus to not state that that is what is being said. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 22:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
You want me to find a source saying that your source is wrong? That's not how this works. You are addicted no the information. It's up to the person adding information to use a reliable source. Per WP:V, you need a reliable source. Per WP:USERG, wikis, such as the one you are using are "LARGELY NOT ACCEPTABLE" and therefore do not qualify as a reliable source. It's the same as if someone makes some claim on Twitter and then someone else tries to use that tweet as some sort of justification to add false information to Wikipedia. I haven't gone through all of your other edits and n this page. It may be time to examine your other sources, especially if you think that a wiki is a reliable source. JOJ Hutton 22:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Feel free to go through my edits, if that will make you feel better. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 23:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it looks as if you've attempted to introduce original research with poor sourcing before as indicated by a previous discussion on the talk page. I see a pattern forming. JOJ Hutton 23:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Uh huh. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 23:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

And did you happen to take a look at WP:USERG? Pretty clear that the source unacceptable. JOJ Hutton 23:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Seriously, I think this has to do more with your obsession with Night at the Museum than the Jed Smith article. How about we just remove the wikilink to the movie, and call it good? Lynn (SLW) (talk) 23:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
How about you add a reliable source and not use a wiki? Did you read the guideline? It's not about my obsession with anything, it's about having a reliable source for information that is included in Wikipedia. There simply just isn't one. JOJ Hutton 23:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Lynn (SLW) (talk) 23:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia says that article states it says what it says. It is a reliable source of it's own statement. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 23:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
But then its not notable on its own merit if that is the case. You are doing some serious wikilawering here. Nitpicking the parts of the guidelines that you think will help, but ignoring the others. You see, using a tweet to say that some celebrity said something is okay by that standard because the celebrity is notable, but using a wiki to say that a wiki says something is no acceptable beaches the wiki in of its self is not notable. --JOJ Hutton 23:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
I'm not even referencing the guidelines. I'm just saying that stating that a source, "reliable" or not, says something is not the same as treating the source as reliable. Especially in a trivial matter, there's nothing wrong with that. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 23:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
There is something wrong with using an unreliable source. Its not encyclopedic and makes an unsubstantiated claim that is clearly without merit or proof. The Night at the Museum wiki is not notable enough to be sourced for its own information.--JOJ Hutton 00:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Well, we are just going to have to agree to disagree. If you like, we can do a RfC. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 00:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
More likely go to WP:RSN. Thats the place for this discussion.--JOJ Hutton 00:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Whatever you like. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 00:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

I don't like at all. I don't like to have to play these games with editors who clearly will not follow the simple policies and guidelines.--JOJ Hutton 00:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Okay, you got your way. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 01:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Its not "my way, its Wp policy and guidelines. And did you deliberately disrupt that article on purpose, or was that an accident?--JOJ Hutton 01:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Take it up with the last editor on the article. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 02:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Okay, RfC filed

And a request to move the previous discussion to the talk page submitted. Lynn (SLW) (talk) 15:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

Birthdate

Hi there! I have reverted your edit regarding the birthdate of Iglesias, as the one you added is a non-RS online profile, and the other is the individual himself saying what his birthdate is (regardless of what language, that is what the article says). I think that someone is probably the best judge of their own birthdate; and I don't see it as a controversial change as there are no true RS that report the other date. Let me know if you disagree though! Jeremy112233 (Lettuce-jibber-jabber?) 22:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

Cool

On checking you out I find I love both the Reagan and the Macaque images. I suspect you may even live up to my standards, regardless of your obvious cluelessnes on copy writing, given you are evidently a right wing scientician, while I am a humanist libertarian merely grounded in the hard sciences. In any case, can we not all get along? μηδείς (talk) 05:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Date formats

As per WP:MOSDATE, articles about the US military generally use DMY format. Perhaps you could restore any changes you've made to save other editors the trouble? Thanks! --Pete (talk) 20:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

There is some discussion on your edits here. --Pete (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Butterfly effect in popular culture

No need to continue repeating comments here. Discussion is on the talk page
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

You're an experienced editor. Surely you've read WP:UNSOURCED. "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." You can't "restore last stable version"... you have to provide citations. By the way, the quality of the citation you provided is very low, but at least it's a start. Everything else that is either "self-sourced" or unsourced should be removed. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 23:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

The article has been tagged since 2008 (2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 tag dates were lost). Eight years is enough times to find citations. Please do not restore unsourced material. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 08:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Butterfly effect in popular culture sandbox

I have pointed out poor sources in case you want to replace them in your sandbox article. Wikis and forum posts are not reliable sources, and sources that merely point out that a work exists "in popular culture" are inadequate. One source, the Wired review/interview, almost qualifies, but it really doesn't discuss any significance of the work. If you need any help with verifying any further sources you add, let me know. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Butterfly effect merge discussion

You have been on Wikipedia long enough to know that there is no preclusion from editing an article while it's being discussed - either for deletion, merge, or for any other reason. My edits were done before the merger discussion and are irrelevant to the merger - they are not "mass deletions" as you keep putting it, they are removal of uncited and poorly-cited material. See talk page for the various issues with these references. You keep bringing up all these irrelevant objections:

Instead of restoring uncited material, why don't you find proper citations. See talk page. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 22:38, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

San Diego Wiknic

Saturday, July 9: San Diego Wiknic

You are invited to the San Diego Wiknic on Saturday, July 9, from 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm in Fanuel Street Park, a grassy park on the Mission Bay side of Pacific Beach. Join San Diego-area Wikimedians at the "picnic anyone can edit" as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the United States.

Visit our event page for full details. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sign up today!

We hope to see you there! --Worldbruce (talk · contribs) 16:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for San Diego-area events by removing your name from this list.)

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Support the proposed WikiProject for the World Trade Center

Dear Jojhutton, my name is ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀 , and I would personally like to invite you to come support this proposed WikiProject which would focus on the World Trade Center site (before and after the September 11 attacks) and related topics. You can read on why this WikiProject is vital to form and improve World Trade Center topics. If you have questions, feel free to ask. Cheers, ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀 02:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IPhone 7

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IPhone 7, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 11:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for starting ANI thread

Just found out and wanted to drop by and thank you for taking the time. See: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Shopping_Centers#ANI_thread_re:_some_recent_PRODs.2FAfDs.2Fredirects_of_mall_articles. Ottawahitech (talk) 15:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Thursday, August 4 San Diego Wiki-Dinner

Join us for an informal San Diego Wiki-Dinner meeting with visiting Wikipedians Rosiestep and Fuzheado, to get to know each other, and to help prepare for WikiConference North America in October 2016! --Pharos (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mickey Mouse Costume.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mickey Mouse Costume.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jojhutton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

What was that for?

I saw that you reverted my edit. Please tell me. What was that for?—Bde1982 (talk) 16:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Not responding to my message, I see. Why?—Bde1982 (talk) 22:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

What was that for?

I saw that you reverted my edit. Please tell me. What was that for?—Bde1982 (talk) 16:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Not responding to my message, I see. Why?—Bde1982 (talk) 22:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

That’s It.

That’s it. I give up waiting for a response from you.—Bde1982 (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

 

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Let's reduce the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement!

Hi Jojhutton, please allow me to get in touch with you because you have stated sympathy with environmental causes on your user page. I would like to invite you to check out the Environmental impact project page on Meta, where I am trying to create some momentum to reduce the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. My first goal is to have all the Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy. Maybe you could show your support for this project as well by adding your signature? Thank you, --Gnom (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Chevrolet Bolt date format

Please go to the talk page of Chevrolet Bolt to avoid an editing war. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Reflecting back on archiving issue

It's been a while...You and I haven't interacted much directly, though we did see each other last year. Reflecting back at Talk:Frasier Crane#Archiving, at the time, I thought renaming a talk page was the right method. However, afterwards, almost no one seems to practice it anymore for article's talk pages. Therefore, rather than renaming talk pages, I have done cut and pasting lately. Look at Talk:Politics of the Republic of China (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs). I didn't do the simple renaming. Instead, I was picky on which discussions to archive, and then I left in very old discussions about the naming issue. I guess you are also right. Also, I stopped being the OWNer of the "Frasier Crane" article and let others edit the page decently, though I still keep an eye on the page. --George Ho (talk) 09:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

February 18 Wikipedia Day event in DTLA

LA Wikipedia Day Celebration (February 18)

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

Please join us at our Wikipedia Day celebration at the Ace Hotel in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday, February 18, 2017 from 11 am to 5 pm! This event will feature lectures, panel discussions, lightning talks, open space discussions and collaboration, and--most importantly--cake! Please RSVP on the event page if you're thinking of joining us.

I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

ANI

As I thought it would, it turned into a big WP:BOOMERANG for the reporter.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I took the conflict over Jedediah Smith to ANI

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Ohio State University edit

I do not understand why you undid my edit to Ohio State University's page, where I removed a grammatically redundant "the" in front of the name. Can you explain why you reverted the change? Alexandermemelton (talk) 02:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)alexandermemelton

This has been discussed in the past. The universities official name is "The Ohio State University". That is why its used where it is used. Consensus is and has always been to use the "THE". Hope that answers your question.--JOJ Hutton 02:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Date formats

Hi, When you change date formats on song articles you need to actually check as for instance you're changing the chart date= links from "{{singlechart|UK|2|date=1999-03-28|accessdate=28 March 1999}}" to "{{singlechart|UK|2|date=March 28, 1999|accessdate=28 March 1999}} " which causes the external links to break (IE you create this),
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to a San Diego edit-a-thon

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/May 2017 . RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Come and join us at the Wiknic

LA Meetup: 6th Wiknic, 7/15 @ Pan Pacific Park

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

You are cordially invited to the 6th Los Angeles Wiknic, a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is planned for Pan-Pacific Park and will be held on Saturday, July 15, 2017 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!

I hope to see you there! Howcheng (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Invitation to San Diego wiknic and bonfire

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/July 2017 Wiknic . RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:59, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

question about posting

Hi. When I suggest an update or edit on the Duke University page using its Talk page, should I provide the rewritten proposed text, or just point out the need for the update and include a link to that new info? (I'm an editor at Duke hence using Talk page)

thanks

--Pismo01 (talk) 13:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Pismo01

LA event this Thursday

LA Meetup: September 7 edit-a-thon near DTLA

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the LA84 Foundation in Jefferson Park (near DTLA) on Thursday, September 7, 2017 from 5:45 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.! This event aims to improve coverage of female Olympians and Paralympians (some of whom will be attending!). There will be a deejay and food/drinks, and kids are welcome.

I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group, follow our Twitter account, and like our Facebook page!! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

September 2017 San Diego Wikiphoto scavenger hunt

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/September 2017 - 1 . RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jojhutton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Precious

"I try to contribute as often and as correctly as possible"

Thank you for articles such as United States v. Martinez-Fuerte and Ron Rodecker, for countless welcome plates for new users and countless warnings of unconstructive editing with the mantra "message re." and a precise link, for informative edit summaries and simple facts, for service in almost ten years, saying "I try to contribute as often and as correctly as possible", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

What she means to say is "Thankyou Jojhutton for supporting my unhealthy obsession with infoboxes". ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Please keep the uncivil name calling to yourself. Calling someone "obsessed" is considered a personal attack.--JOJ Hutton 18:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
I am used to be called a monster, found that actually more charming. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK that I go to an infobox discussion when I am personally invited? What I usually find is a failure to assume good faith (paraphrasing "failure to obey" from WP:Great Dismal Swamp), which is unhealthy indeed, so I try to avoid it. O du fröhliche Weihnachtszeit --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Missing end tag lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Jojhutton|<font color="#A81933">JOJ</font>]] [[User talk:Jojhutton|<font color="#CC9900"><sup>Hutton</sup>]] : JOJ Hutton

to

[[User:Jojhutton|<span style="color: #A81933;">JOJ</span>]] [[User talk:Jojhutton|<sup style="color: #CC9900;">Hutton</sup>]] : JOJ Hutton

—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day LA, March 31

Wikipedia Day LA 2018

Please join us from 10:00 am - 5:00 pm on Saturday, March 31st for Wikipedia Day LA 2018 at the Ace Hotel in downtown Los Angeles. There will be speakers, panel discussions, a presentation on Wikidata, flash sessions, and a discussion about the formation of an LA User Group. There could be dramatic readings of LA-related talk pages, and there will be truly excellent cake. Please RSVP on the event page if you're thinking of joining us.

We hope to see you there! JSFarman (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group here, and follow us on Twitter .

To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Invitation to a bonfire

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/April 2018 . RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jojhutton/Archive_8&oldid=1065968868"