User talk:Jessamyn/archive3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfD nomination of Jessamyn West (librarian)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jessamyn West (librarian), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessamyn West (librarian) (2nd nomination). Thank you.

#1Lib1Ref userbox[edit]

Hi Jessamyn, I borrowed your lovely code for the #1Lib1Ref userbox. Thanks so much! Laurabrarian (talk) 23:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Laurabrarian[reply]

Project[edit]

Hello I'm in high school my names bella for one of my assignments i need the author of Timeline of disability rights in the United States and it says you were most recent but i need your whole name thank you if you cant i understand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:203:0:6E2E:D0CE:B784:4BB5:4923 (talk) 00:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi My full name is Jessamyn West. You can email me at [email protected] Jessamyn (talk) 00:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Has the FBI been here?[edit]

Library sign designed by Jessamyn West

Hello.

The first time I recall encountering you name was innumerable aeons ago in the early 21st century, where I read on some internet page that you were involved in the creation of a sign in reaction to the "Patriot Act" to be displayed in libraries in Vermont. So I'm wondering if there is some account of the history of the use of these signs. In particular: Did every public library in Vermont use them? Did some get taken down after being displayed? In such cases, was there ever any reason besides the removal of the sign to think that the FBI had been there? Are they still used now? Have federal authorities had anything to say about the matter? Did apparitions of Nathaniel Chipman or Moses Robinson say anything about it? (ok, Ignore that last unless you don't ignore it.....) Michael Hardy (talk) 07:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to participate in #1lib1ref[edit]

Jessamyn, thanks for your message.

Thanks![edit]

Hi and thanks for your warm welcome! :-)

Du erhältst einen Orden![edit]

Der Fotografenorden
Danke für das Foto des New York Subway Tokens...:-)
Joli Tambour (talk) 12:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Jordan Ellenberg Author photo.jpg[edit]

Hello, Jessamyn. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Jordan Ellenberg Author photo.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to [email protected]. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

  • If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to [email protected] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Sarah Weinman.jpg[edit]

Hello, Jessamyn. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Sarah Weinman.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to [email protected]. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

  • If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to [email protected] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Sixty-miler (Ships)[edit]

Hi,

Thank you for the feedback on the draft article 'Sixty-Milers'(Ships)

I have updated the draft this morning and added more citations, in line with your comment

Regards, TrimmerinWiki

reply about comment on proposed entry for Live at KEXP Volume 6[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for your comment. I would offer citations if there were any appropriate ones that I could think of, but the proposed page is a citation in and of itself, it's a "fact", a supporting piece of data to a change I made to another page, the page about South African singer / songwriter Vusi Mahlasela. Can you explain to me what citations you think I ought to be able to offer / make in support of the entry, please?

I too love KEXP, and I would love to create pages for the other "Live at KEXP" compilations at some point - there are 9 in total, so if my entry were to be approved we would need 7 more entries to have them all featured. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olivergodby (talkcontribs) 11:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hi Jessamyn! That's fun =) I'm glad to see you here! -Kenirwin/(talk) 15:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jessamyn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Jessamyn/archive3. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Jessamyn! You created a thread called diplomacy in bio article I created at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Anna Sutherland Bissell[edit]

Hi Jessamyn, I was gonna move on after a few changes of Anna Sutherland Bissell. Your thanks kept me going. The article has been updated with more content and lits of refs. Wow, what an amazing woman. You can review the links and grab her image now. Your thanks are great! Keep them up. SWP13 (talk) 04:45, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hewlett[edit]

This would make a good DYK -- too bad you didn't nominate it when it was created. However, it can still get to DYK via GA, though there are some sourcing problems (apparent OR from primary sources, use of non-RS such as Family Search). I'm not clear if you have access to the Harvard Archives, but I do, so I can help that way if you want. EEng 19:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Mutschler article[edit]

Jessamyn, I just have to thank you for your work creating the Charles Mutschler article. Charles -- Charlie, as I knew him -- was a friend and colleague here at the EWU Libraries, where I have worked for four years, and he for forty, of course. He was an unfailingly kind and generous fellow -- cheerful, encouraging, a born storyteller, and someone who leaves a real sense of absence behind him all over the campus and community, given how many activities and organizations he was an important component of. This afternoon a coworker emailed me to ask if I knew there was a Wikipedia article about him now, and it was a real delight to come here and see the work you'd done. Charlie was, as it happens, a real supporter of Wikipedia on campus -- shortly after my arrival here I shared my Wikipedia history with him and asked if he would collaborate on an edit-a-thon. He was enthusiastic, and just last month we completed our 4th annual edit-a-thon -- none of them really possible without Charlie's tireless work helping to find suitable local subjects and work with our archival collections (and his many contacts at local agencies and cultural institutions) to supply us with the raw materials for our work. It will be with a heavy heart, later this year, that the rest of us on the team work out how to carry on without him -- but we will. He was so proud that the stories of a community that meant so much to him were being shared with a broader audience, and he took every opportunity to praise the work to others (emphasizing the work of the rest of the team, as was his way, and usually forgetting to even mention that he was a member of "the team" that he was talking about). So it is a comfort and a joy to think that his story has found a place here -- a story that perhaps one day we will grow a little, with the help of the materials his long and meaningful career leaves in his wake. Anyway, from one long-time Wikipedian to another (there can't be all that many of us still around the site after fifteen years plus), seeing this little article take root here (the story of a man no encyclopedia of my youth would have thought worth the telling) reminds me of what I loved about this place from the first -- our open-mindedness, our commitment to assume good faith and help each other, and our belief that maybe someday all the world's information could be free. Thank you, again, and my very best wishes -- Jwrosenzweig (talk) 22:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Susan Nutter NCSU.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Susan Nutter NCSU.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jessamyn,

Thank you for the feedback on the draft article Grant Sabatier

I have updated the draft with reliable resources and inline citations in the Background Story section.

Regards, Cody — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.33.160.252 (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:James Edward Hanger.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (📧) 14:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Cora Mowatt[edit]

Say, an edit you made to the Anna Cora Mowatt article 14 April, was arguable. Mrs. Mowatt was indeed a 'public reader'; one of those mid-Victorian Chautauqua circuit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chautauqua things where actors and celebrities like Mark Twain recited literature as popular entertainment. It was a big deal at the time, and a page is devoted to it here; http://alphacentauri2.info/AnnaCoraMowatt/Career%20as%20a%20Public%20Reader.htm 172.220.152.26 (talk) 17:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- feel free to put that back in if you think its warranted. Jessamyn (talk) 17:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - modeling data[edit]

As you may have seen, there are community discussions underway on how to best model structured data on Commons.

Direct links to pages created so far:

Please visit and participate in topics you might be interested in when you get some time. Thanks. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging designs[edit]

I've published a design consultation for the computer-aided tagging tool. Please look over the page and participate on the talk page. If you haven't read over the project page, it might be helpful to do so first. The tool will hopefully be ready by the end of this month (October 2019), so timely feedback is important. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest[edit]

US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:QBPxH8aC 400x400.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:QBPxH8aC 400x400.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]