User talk:JeffLB

Welcome!

Hello, JeffLB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JackyR | Talk 21:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Socialist Party of Azania. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. cf. Wikipedia:Verifiability

I did not knowingly introduce false information to the Socialist Party of Azania article. "Vandalism"? This response seems something of an overreaction. Nevertheless I take the suggestion in the spirit of concern over maintaining a high quality of Wikipedia editing. JeffLB (talk) 17:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Barbara Lerner Spectre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Lerner Spectre said those words, which I have documented, and if Google search is any indication it is as a result of that that most people look her up. Thus the words have significance here. Please see my comment on the Barbara Lerner Spectre article talk page.

April 2014[edit]

Your recent editing history at Barbara Lerner Spectre shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:JeffLB reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]