User talk:Jameslawrence19

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jameslawrence19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Ammarpad (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop?[edit]

Can please stop changing Erik Stocklin's birthdate to 1989? There were two different sources that show his age, with his age as 35, which would make his birthdate 1982, one source was from WTOP, which used an article from the Associated Press, and the other link was his Connecticut Voter registration. Paige Matheson (talk) 18:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Stocklin[edit]

Hello,
With regard to some of your edits at Stocklin's page, please do not remove sourced material and replace it with content without sources. Biographical articles must be well-sourced and any unreferenced material may be challenged and removed. If your edits are removed as unsourced, please do not just restore them as this is known as edit warring and can lead to the loss of editing privileges irrespective of the merits of the edits. You should discuss the matter with other editors involved to reach agreement. Please read carefully, all the links you have been provided with above and it is noted that your edits only seem to be to this one page. Please read WP:SPA for information in this respect. Please also get into the habit of completing the edit summary as this tells other editors what has been changed and why. Thank you. Happy editing. Eagleash (talk) 18:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Erik Stocklin.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You cannot change sourced material without providing citations to corroborate your 'information'. Your account seems to be single purpose and you have not engaged or discussed with other editors. As soon as the the page protection was lifted you resumed with the same disruptive edits. Eagleash (talk) 08:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Erik Stocklin. Eagleash (talk) 15:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Erik Stocklin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Erik Stocklin‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

What is your agenda here? You have continually disrupted the page by adding unsourced material and despite requests and warnings and 'advice' contained in the source, have continued to do so even after editing privileges were removed. Please do not carry on in this vein as it can only lead to a longer, if not indefinite, block. It is noted that you have only edited that page and have failed to engage with other editors. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 19:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Erik Stocklin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

It is noted that you have ignored advice and warnings and have have not responded to communications from other editors. You are apparently not here to build an encyclopedia. Your actions have been reported. Eagleash (talk) 14:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]