User talk:Itsadnanhere

This is My Talk Page You can Leave me a msg here Thanks

Itsadnanhere, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Itsadnanhere! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
11	Valdezia (talk)	Add sources
11	Tripura Janasiksha Samiti (talk)	Add sources
19	Koca Hüsrev Mehmed Pasha (talk)	Add sources
49	Hurshid Pasha (talk)	Add sources
200	Sokollu Mehmed Pasha (talk)	Add sources
8	Humberto de Campos (journalist) (talk)	Add sources
7	Hüseyin Pasha Boljanić (talk)	Cleanup
93	D. K. Aruna (talk)	Cleanup
12	Leonardo Villar (talk)	Cleanup
47	Boşnak Derviş Mehmed Pasha (talk)	Expand
10	Kadri Pasha (talk)	Expand
19	Nasuh Pasha (talk)	Expand
97	Rajiv Pratap Rudy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,305	Abdul Hamid II (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
400	Sangh Parivar (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
196	Sharad Yadav (talk)	Merge
112	Ghar Wapsi (talk)	Merge
3	Samuel Sallas Mensah (talk)	Merge
23	Hadım Sinan Pasha (talk)	Wikify
52	Hebe Camargo (talk)	Wikify
105	Circassians in Turkey (talk)	Wikify
62	Vijay Kumar Mandal (talk)	Orphan
4	Kamleshwari Prasad Yadav (talk)	Orphan
2	Lauren Kalman (talk)	Orphan
2	Padma Kumar Debbarma (talk)	Stub
152	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
5	Izzet Mehmed Pasha (talk)	Stub
3	Naresh Jamatia (talk)	Stub
5	Ignacio de Loyola Brandão (talk)	Stub
3	Rajendra Reang (Tripura Politician) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Itsadnanhere! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Empire AS ^Talk! 18:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syed Shabahat Ali Shah (May 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Apart from brief mentions and a reference which is essentially a handout mentioning the speakers in a conference, there are an references from reliable sources detailing him

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Syed Shabahat Ali Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Syed Shabahat Ali Shah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 05:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Talib moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Daily Talib, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 16:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear For the newspaper no sources where required only the official website is enough for this article

i am requesting to you again that please republish my article thanks

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syed Shabahat Ali Shah (July 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Syed Shabahat Ali Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Syed Shabahat Ali Shah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:03, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daily Talib[edit]

Hello, Itsadnanhere. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daily Talib, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Syed Shabahat Ali Shah[edit]

Hello, Itsadnanhere. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Syed Shabahat Ali Shah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daily Talib (January 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daily Talib and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daily Talib, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Burj News for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burj News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burj News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~Styyx^Talk? 21:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daily Talib for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daily Talib is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Talib until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

: Deletionlist (talk) 13:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]