User talk:Induvadhone

Induvadhone, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Induvadhone! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021: Wikipedia is not about "the up and coming"

Wikipedia is only about things (and people) which have already been written about in reliable, published sources. The fact that you have noted that someone is up and coming is not a justification for an article. Wikipedia is about those who have "already arrived". Writing a Wikipedia article in order to help a person's career is usually a futile gesture.--Quisqualis (talk) 10:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank You, :) Induvadhone (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Induvadhone! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, New article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of PVR Raja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PVR Raja, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PVR Raja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Please read the discussion listed above Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank You Mr.Gbawden, I understand this now. If there is an opportunity to improve or devlop the article, please let me know. I noticed that the article was deleted due to changes made by some new users and failure to gather correct information. I respect your action if the article is permanently deleted. If there is a chance, I am ready to revise and improve the article completely following the Wikipedia guidelines. Having collected PVR Raja News and having full knowledge about article, I request you to improve the article as per wikipedia citations. Thank You Mr.Gbawden. Induvadhone (talk) 16:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Black (2022 film)

The article Black (2022 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. 2 reviews needed, only 1 found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of P.V.R. Raja

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on P.V.R. Raja requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PVR Raja. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 11:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of P.V.R. Raja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P.V.R. Raja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.V.R. Raja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 22:08, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Induvadhone. I see that you uploaded the image used in this article, and according to your own image description, the photo was taken while shooting a music video. Are you in any way affiliated with this artist? If so, you have a conflict of interest; please read that page carefully, and make the necessary disclosures. If not, can you please explain how you can to take the photograph? Vanamonde (Talk) 19:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Vanamonde. Less than three weeks ago the subject mentioned in his official Facebook story for this video shoot, and it was my hometown, It was possible to take this photo because I was very close to the shooting area that day. Induvadhone (talk) 03:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for clarifying. May I also ask if you have discussed the article off-wiki? Vanamonde (Talk) 05:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

No, i have not discussed the article off-wiki, I introduced myself as a person who is passionate about music and movies. I got his photo with his full permission and consent. There was no discussion on his story. Induvadhone (talk) 10:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Induvadhone. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 06:24, 25 December 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Nomination of Full Moon Media Production for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Full Moon Media Production is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full Moon Media Production until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Akevsharma (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Induvadhone! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can IMDb be taken as a source for making filmography of an article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . Let me add that I have read if the topic is truly notable, it will have other sources that meet WP:RS.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)