User talk:Immanuelle/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iron Front (United States) (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NORG, lacks any reliable independent secondary sources. Twitter and Reddit are not acceptable references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iron Front (United States) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Iron Front (United States), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:The time allocated for running scripts has expired.png

Thanks for uploading File:The time allocated for running scripts has expired.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamayori-hime (mother of Jimmu), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kiki and Sumiyoshi Shrine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Kiki (Shinto) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kiki (Shinto), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 07:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1st Century in Science (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at History of science instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1st Century in Science and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1st Century in Science, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Astolfo (Fate/stay night) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Astolfo (Fate/stay night), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 07:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Russell Brand

I can find no source saying he is bisexual, therefore, I have reverted the categories you just added.

Where did you read/see that he is bisexual. Le Marteau (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

I read it from a 2014 interview, that I turned out to have misunderstood. He actually said he wanted to be bisexual and had sex with men in the past Immanuelle (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

From what I've gathered, he went around to various gay bars with a film crew and found one guy he masturbated in a bathroom. That is not "men". Le Marteau (talk) 02:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

I say this only because it is important that we be careful about discussing living people. Misstatements about them, particularly about sensitive issues such as sexuality, must be either removed or corrected anywhere it appears on the encyclopedia, even on talk pages. Peace out. Le Marteau (talk) 02:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astolfo (Fate/stay night) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not demonstrate sufficient notability for a standalone article based on sources cited in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Astolfo (Fate/stay night) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Astolfo (Fate/stay night), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Chinese Cult category

Please make sure the article supports adding this category. At least 2 articles are about South Korean cults with no mention of China.Slywriter (talk) 19:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC) @Slywriter: Will do. This is a formal list by the Chinese government so there will be proper citations for this, at least on the Chinese Wikipedia articles from I categorized the groups from (with the exceptions of Heterodox teachings (Chinese law) and Murder of Wu Shuoyan which are not groups themselves but strongly linked to it) Immanuelle (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

The two articles I reverted make no mention of any members or activities in China, so unless sections are added about their activities in China and are sourced to WP:SECONDARY reliable sources, it is unlikely the Chinese government list justifies the category. Also, remember Chinese Wikipedia and English Wikipedia are different projects with different guidelines. Slywriter (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

and no issue with the other two mentioned, they discuss China.Slywriter (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@Slywriter: can you link those two articles so I can look over them? Immanuelle (talk) 19:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Shincheonji Church of Jesus and Dami Mission Slywriter (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is there a way to follow specific Wikipedia projects, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yamatai Kyushu Theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawachi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Emperor Suizei

I undid your edit because the list of descendants is basically a copy of things at List of emperors of Japan#Gallery. These early emperors are also mythical, and the tree showing status based on the Kiki reflects that. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Himetataraisuzu-hime, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Pages I'm working on

I'm currently working on improving Kyushu dynasty theory and Draft:Yamato Kingship and Yamatai Kyushu Theory and Yamatai Honshu Theory Immanuelle (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shinshi (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shinshi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shinshi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astolfo (Fate/Apocrypha character) (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Continues to fail notability. This article would quickly be deleted if sent to AfD and information on the character is better off placed in List of Fate/Apocrypha characters instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Astolfo (Fate/Apocrypha character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Astolfo (Fate/Apocrypha character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Akihito into Emperor Taishō. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@DanCherek: How may I do that for edits I previously did but forgot to include in the edit summary? Immanuelle (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Just make a dummy edit, or you can fix a minor error in the page like I did here. Thanks for your understanding and willingness! Or, feel free to just tell me where you previously copied material and I'd be happy to take care of it. DanCherek (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aiko,_Princess_Toshi&oldid=1070847193 here from her father, and also the Japanese Wikipedia article on her mother. Here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emperor_Meiji&oldid=1070846904 from Hirohito, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Takahito,_Prince_Mikasa&oldid=1070845311 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nobuhito,_Prince_Takamatsu&oldid=1070845266 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuhito,_Prince_Chichibu&oldid=1070845155 all three of them from Emperor Taisho Immanuelle (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

All done! Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft status for multiple articles

@Immanuelle:

I noticed that you re-moved various articles back to the mainspace, after I'd moved them to draftspace just a few days ago. I also notice that, while you appear to be editing these pages, you haven't yet corrected the biggest issues with them -- chunks of text still in Japanese, badly machine-translated text that isn't grammatical, lack of sourcing, various things listed as "references" when they appear to be more "annotations".

Considering the substantial issues with these pages, I recommend that they be moved back to draftspace until the text can be rendered in grammatical and meaningful English, and appropriate sources can be added (even if that's a matter of translating the bibliographic info for Japanese sources and translating the relevant source text sections).

Also pinging @Liz: since she appears to be much more knowledgeable about drafts and moves than I am.

The articles in question:

It looks like you've made the most progress with the Makimuku ruins page. However, this still has numerous issues.

"Makimukyamata" is not a Japanese term. The text links through to ja:Makimukyamata River, but the Japanese Wikipedia does not have any article by that title, nor by any homophonic title in Japanese script.
There are still strange machine-translation artifacts littered through the page. Examples include:

The name of the Archaeological site comes from the village of Makimuku in the former Isogi-gun, and the village name "Makimuku" was taken from the "Makimuku Tamaki Palace" of Suinin and the "Makimuku Hijiro Palace" of Emperor Keikō's "Tamaki Palace" and Emperor Hishiro Palace of Keikō,

The above is the entirety of the first paragraph in the #Location and site outline section.

Note that excavation, who was in charge of the Ishino Hironobu, assigned the calendar years 180 to 210 for "Garment 1".

This is the last sentence of the third paragraph in that same #Location and site outline section. Note that the links go through to the Japanese Wikipedia: one to the non-existent article at ja:excavation, and two to irrelevant articles at ja:180 and ja:210, which discuss the numbers themselves.

The three tumuli are surrounded by the Garoshi Katsuyama tumulus (top), the Yatsuka tumulus (bottom left) and the Ishizuka tumulus (bottom right), and the Garoshi Elementary School is located between them.

This is a caption for one of the pictures. The problem here is that the tumuli are not surrounded by anything in the picture, and instead they surround the elementary school.

Sourcing is inadequate.
Strange formatting that renders the meaning unclear.

On the map of the site, the area of the site is centered on JR Makimuki Station and stretches about 2km from east to west and about 1.5km from north to south, forming an oval shape with an area of 3km2 (3 million m2).

Emphasis mine. Clearer phrasing might be "three square kilometers", for instance.

Chunks of text still in Japanese.

In addition to the References at the bottom, there's also the 「搬入土器の出身地割合」 table in the #Main excavated artifacts section.

Immanuelle, I look forward to your thoughts. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 01:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

@Eirikr: Thank you for this input. I feel with it I managed to make substantial improvements on these articles, and their sourcing. The Exception being History of Shinto because it is quite long and has a complex set of references Immanuelle (talk) 06:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

@Immanuelle: Thanks for the reply. That makes sense, and I am reassured that someone is actively working on these. I hope the above provides useful feedback on further improvements. Kind regards, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 23:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Coming late to this productive discussion. I am usually moving inadequately sourced or incomplete articles to Draft space than rather than improving content. I am not a content creator but it's nice to see Immanuelle work on improving articles. All I can really add is that editors often move pages into Draft space when there is a possibility that they could be tagged for speedy deletion. New page patrollers are very efficient in evaluating new pages and tagging for deletion those that meet speedy deletion criteria. Although pages in Draft space can still be tagged for speedy deletion (most often advertising or promotional content), it's considered a "safe space" for articles to be improved upon so that is often the reason why articles that could be deleted are moved to this name space. It's rarely a comment on the substance or subject (or its notability) of an article but after an evaluation of the present condition of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Theology Sidebar

Template:Theology Sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:20, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miko clothing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bow and Ladle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shinto mirror (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs sourcing to establish how this is notable, as well as improvements to the claims. Claims also need to be attributed. For example, when writing "some say" the question is who is saying this? Is anyone actually saying this? If so, then what are their qualifications? Keep in mind that we can only summarize what has been explicitly stated in reliable sources, preferably academic and scholarly sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shinto mirror and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shinto mirror, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Trouted 1

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Adding this to your profile Immanuelle (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Trouted 2

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Immanuelle (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Trouted 3

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: No reason I just love trouting Immanuelle (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kotobank for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kotobank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotobank until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Salidou moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Salidou, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 00:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Turkic creation myth has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Turkic creation myth. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vietnamese refugee detention centres in Hong Kong has been accepted

Vietnamese refugee detention centres in Hong Kong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alperen Tolgahan İme (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No signs of significant coverage and meeting the general notability guideline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alperen Tolgahan İme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alperen Tolgahan İme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 09:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adolf Hitler Uunona

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adolf Hitler Uunona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Uunona. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 19:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

I didn't know it was deleted before. I thought the page was just conspicuously absent in English. The fact basically every other language has it means it probably should be kept though Immanuelle (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Just because other projects have it is meaningless. The standard of notability on English Wikipedia is not a global policy. CUPIDICAE💕 19:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

You should have seen on the page before you created it that the article had been deleted before multiple times. It is now protected from being recreated. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Turkic creation myth has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Turkic creation myth. Thanks! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Miko (anime and manga) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miko (anime and manga) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miko (anime and manga) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Goszei (talk) 07:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sect Shinto

A tag has been placed on Sect Shinto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 23:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sect Shinto

A tag has been placed on Sect Shinto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 23:27, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

@IAmChaos: I have no clue what happened but that redirect was supposed to go to where it is now. Immanuelle (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Yup! As soon as I tagged it I got a watchlist email that you were changing the page, and I've now removed the tag. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 23:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Religious organizations disestablished in 1999

A tag has been placed on Category:Religious organizations disestablished in 1999 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hikoyai (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rollidan was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hikoyai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hikoyai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rollidan (talk) 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

The manga fandom is a good place to move your article to

https://manga.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page

No one will try to delete your work there. Dream Focus 08:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

@Dream Focus: What article are you talking about? Immanuelle (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your article Mikos in anime and manga is now up for deletion. Dream Focus 21:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

@Dream Focus: thank you. I added it here https://manga.fandom.com/wiki/Mikos_in_anime_and_manga is that wiki essentially a wiki made by Wikipedians to preserve anime and manga Wikipedia pages that would otherwise be deleted? It feels more academic than the typical wikia wiki Immanuelle (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Well hard to know what to put on the main page. Other wikias have just one thing they are dedicated to, so you can just link to characters, episodes, issues, etc. There were a lot of manga and anime articles being delete almost daily back in 2010 when I started exporting them to there. Dream Focus 23:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shinko-shiki (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Serial Number 54129 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are other issues too. The prose accepts the existence of genies, etc., in Wikipedia's voice; it reads more as an essay than an encyclopedia entry; and not only does it rely on insufficient sources, it has large amounts (I.e., the majority) of uncited text.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shinko-shiki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shinko-shiki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SN54129 14:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Turkic creation myth (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are not enough references to demonstrate that this topic is notable and that the story section isn't simply made up by the editor. Please look more widely for sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Turkic creation myth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Turkic creation myth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you for having proposed an improvement for the name of my category.--Geysirhead (talk) 07:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

@Geysirhead: do you know what's going on with the move of Category:Rule by a subset of population because it doesn't seem to have happened yet. There's a bot that will move them to Category:Merocracy right? Immanuelle (talk) 05:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

There is discussion about the word Merocracy in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 February 19#Category:Merocracy --Geysirhead (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shukubo (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No substantive change since draftification. As Onel5969 said, you need more sources. I can't find most of the content of the Overview section in your two references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shukubo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shukubo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 16:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dick pic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social dominance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Changing name of image I created, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omiki (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Religion and alcohol. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source. This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, [[Talk:{{{1}}}]]. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omiki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Omiki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Yamai national theory moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yamai national theory, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Immanuelle/LiquidFriesland

The page Immanuelle/LiquidFriesland has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

WP:G6 and WP:G7

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Currently working on

I'm currently working on Template:Sexagenary cycles

Sexagenary cycle
1 Wood Rat	2 Wood Ox [ja]	3 Fire Tiger [ja]	4 Fire Rabbit [ja]	5 Earth Dragon	6 Earth Snake [ja]
7 Metal Horse [ja]	8 Metal Goat [ja]	9 Water Monkey [ja]	10 Water Rooster [ja]	11 Wood Dog [ja]	12 Wood Pig [ja]
13 Fire Rat [ja]	14 Fire Ox [ja]	15 Earth Tiger [ja]	16 Earth Rabbit [ja]	17 Metal Dragon [ja]	18 Metal Snake [ja]
19 Water Horse [ja]	20 Water Goat [ja]	21 Wood Monkey [ja]	22 Wood Rooster [ja]	23 Fire Dog [ja]	24 Fire Pig [ja]
25 Earth Rat [ja]	26 Earth Ox [ja]	27 Metal Tiger [ja]	28 Metal Rabbit [ja]	29 Water Dragon [ja]	30 Water Snake [ja]
31 Wood Horse [ja]	32 Wood Goat [ja]	33 Fire Monkey [ja]	34 Fire Rooster [ja]	35 Earth Dog [ja]	36 Earth Pig [ja]
37 Metal Rat [ja]	38 Metal Ox [ja]	39 Water Tiger [ja]	40 Water Rabbit [ja]	41 Wood Dragon [ja]	42 Wood Snake [ja]
43 Fire Horse	44 Fire Goat [ja]	45 Earth Monkey [ja]	46 Earth Rooster [ja]	47 Metal Dog [ja]	48 Metal Pig [ja]
49 Water Rat [ja]	50 Water Ox [ja]	51 Wood Tiger [ja]	52 Wood Rabbit [ja]	53 Fire Dragon [ja]	54 Fire Snake [ja]
55 Earth Horse [ja]	56 Earth Goat [ja]	57 Metal Monkey	58 Metal Rooster	59 Water Dog [ja]	60 Water Pig [ja]
Heavenly Stems ・ Earthly Branches

I want to eventually translate all the articles, and also the Japanese articles on old calendar dates, they frequently pop up in translations related to Shinto and Japanese hisotory Immanuelle (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Kiki (Shinto) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kiki (Shinto), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Problems with new article "Reflexive control"

Hello, Immanuelle, thanks for creating the article Reflexive control. There are a few problems with it that need fixing. First, the lead sentence reads poorly; I notice that you used the m:ContenTranslation tool, which is fine, but I have to ask if you know Russian well enough to translate the Russian article into English, or perhaps you are relying on machine translation to do it for you? Or, perhaps your Russian is fluent, but your English writing needs help? In any case, the first sentence, and portions of the rest of the article needs attention from someone who speaks sufficient Russian and English to do a capable translation.

In addition, several of the references are not properly formatted, and cause error messages on the page; see the red messages in the "References" section.

Finally, for the "title" of one of the sources, you added in footnote 7 that the article title in Russian is "Архивированная копия", but if you understand Russian, you know that this is not the title of any book in Russian, and simply means "Archival copy". If this is your level of Russian, you probably should not be translating articles from Russian without assistance. You can ask for help at WP:WikiProject Russia, or look for a Russian-translating Wikipedian.

Can you acknowledge receiving this message, and let me know that you are working on fixing these problems? Otherwise, the article might need to be moved to Draft space for the time being. Mathglot (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Foreign language competence

I notice you are using the ContentTranslation tool to create translations of articles from Chinese (1), Japanese (2, 3), Russian (4, 5), and German (6). May I ask you to rate your fluency in these languages? You may do so by replying below, or simply use the convenient {{Babel}} template on your user page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yamatai Kyushu Theory (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mako001 was:

Serious issues with tone, sourcing, citation style and there is a serious lack of inline citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yamatai Kyushu Theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yamatai Kyushu Theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyushu dynasty theory (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mako001 was:

Serious issues with tone, sourcing, citation style and there is a serious lack of inline citations. Also it seems to be far too long and detailed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyushu dynasty theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyushu dynasty theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I appreciate having actionable criticism on it, and will work on improving it based on those ways. Same with Yamatai Kyushu theory Immanuelle (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Susa Shrine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Susa Shrine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 07:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Crossplay, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See WP:DABNAME for information Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 07:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

I apologize for this, my impression was that disambiguation pages always needed (disambiguation) at the end of their names Immanuelle (talk) 07:34, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gion cult (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Entirety of "Shrines of Gion Shinto" section, and several statements in lead, are unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gion cult and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gion cult, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 22:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Usurping a username from another wiki, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benedicto Crespo-Facorro (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Why has this draft been submitted, when it is clearly not finished? The 'Career' section repeats twice. There are section headings in Spanish. Two sources (Orchid, Elsevier) don't work, effectively leaving the 'Career' section unreferenced. Etc. (I also have concerns about notability, but for now that is not the grounds for declining.) --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benedicto Crespo-Facorro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Actual idealism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ovide.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omiki has been accepted

Omiki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 20:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lobster 12.5 (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The singular source is not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lobster 12.5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lobster 12.5, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 01:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne Witkowsky (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a well created page-- good job. It may be that Witkowsky can meet the requirements but unfortunately the draft in its current form does not make clear how she satisfies WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPOL. The addition of any reliable sources (see WP:RS) would help significantly. Also note that press releases (there are 3) are generally not considered WP:RS. Please amend the page accordingly, resubmit and ping me and I'd be happy to reassess afresh. And don't be too perturbed-- it's a good start!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anne Witkowsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anne Witkowsky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 02:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Përparim Rama has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Përparim Rama. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 03:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Përparim Rama has been accepted

Përparim Rama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noahfgodard (talk) 05:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Bejat Revolution (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional reference are essential.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Al-Bejat Revolution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Al-Bejat Revolution, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:57, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emanuel K. Miranda (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:FILMMAKER.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emanuel K. Miranda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emanuel K. Miranda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Revolutionary Kanbun theory

The article Revolutionary Kanbun theory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Citation only refers to the accession of Emperor Jinmu section and there are no citations for "Revolutionary Kanbun theory".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gusfriend (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comparison of virtual assistants (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lead section must be more elaborated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Comparison of virtual assistants and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Comparison of virtual assistants, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monaco–Ukraine relations (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Large portion of this submission is unsourced. Please add references and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monaco–Ukraine relations and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monaco–Ukraine relations, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liechtenstein–Ukraine relations (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Probably a notable topic. Though, large portion of this submission is unsourced. Please add references and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liechtenstein–Ukraine relations and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Liechtenstein–Ukraine relations, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yan Han (Jin Dynasty) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eviolite were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are an editable wiki (WP:UGC) and a one-paragraph mention. Was draftified earlier with no improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yan Han (Jin Dynasty) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yan Han (Jin Dynasty), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 11:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yan Minchu (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eviolite were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yan Minchu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yan Minchu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 11:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Purple Coat Incident (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eviolite were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more sourcing than just one source verifying one sentence.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Purple Coat Incident and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Purple Coat Incident, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop submitting drafts without editing them

You've recently drive-by submitted a few drafts that were draftified, as they were not ready for namespace, to AFC without editing them. Please don't do this, since they were already determined to be unfit for mainspace and submitting without trying to improve the article is just wasting AfC reviewers' time. See how you've already received 21 declined draft notices. eviolite (talk) 11:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Also, please don't move articles like First Polish War, which are clearly not suitable for mainspace (that one has only one source and no inline citations), out of draftspace. eviolite (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fixed time period model (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fixed time period model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fixed time period model, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lithuanian Swedes (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

need more than one source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lithuanian Swedes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lithuanian Swedes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zholudeva Street (Kyiv) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:NSTREET defers to essentially GNG and there's only one source here

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zholudeva Street (Kyiv) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zholudeva Street (Kyiv), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 12:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: TV Toya (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

needs multiple sources for WP:GNG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TV Toya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TV Toya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 12:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Software defined manufacturing (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eviolite were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube is not a reliable source, being user-generated

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Software defined manufacturing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Software defined manufacturing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 12:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicki Nicole: Bzrp Music Sessions, Vol. 13 (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:NSONG suggests a national chart suggests it may be notable, not that it is; notability not clearly demonstrated as no other sources have bene provided

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicki Nicole: Bzrp Music Sessions, Vol. 13 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nicki Nicole: Bzrp Music Sessions, Vol. 13, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 13:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monster in a Box (TV series) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Facebook page with no information is not a RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monster in a Box (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monster in a Box (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 13:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sony Ericsson S510 (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eviolite were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the info is entirely unsourced. Also, a database providing info on all phones is trivial coverage and the official website is not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sony Ericsson S510 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sony Ericsson S510, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 13:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laplata Yonif 143/TWEJ F.C. (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:NTEAM defers to GNG, which this does not demonstrably meet (one source)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laplata Yonif 143/TWEJ F.C. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laplata Yonif 143/TWEJ F.C., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don't Disturb My Study (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No TV SNG and GNG is not demonstrated, having only one source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don't Disturb My Study and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Don't Disturb My Study, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 13:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RDVC RFC (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The two sources like self-published at best, essentially team blogs

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RDVC RFC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RDVC RFC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 13:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Working on submitting drafts

Seeing as how a prolific draftifier has recently stopped and left a lot of articles in deletion limbo I plan on taking it upon myself to submit many of the drafts and try to get good content preserved which may be lost due to the 6 month deletion rule. I hope this doesn't clog up AFC too much, but I think with this script being used less there will likely be way less articles in it long term. Immanuelle (talk) 01:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

I just noticed that some of the articles that you have submitted haven't been changed since they were moved to draft space as they were not ready for mainspace and would suggest that they should be left in draft space until they are ready. Gusfriend (talk) 06:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

What Gusfriend said. I have had to decline over a dozen of them just in the last two hours when patrolling CAT:AFC0. If you want to avoid WP:G13 deletion, just make any edit at all rather than submitting. And please don't unilaterally move them back without resolving the issues. (See the section below, User talk:Immanuelle#Please stop submitting drafts without editing them, which I created without seeing this one.) eviolite (talk) 13:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faustin Luanga has been accepted

Faustin Luanga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Yamatai footer

Template:Yamatai footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Macre (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent notability from Crack the Sky. A lot of sources need to be cleaned up to refer to external news sources. If he is a producer or songwriter, that part should be evaluated under WP:COMPOSER instead of WP:MUSICBIO. Do not cite discogs or retail sites.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe Macre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joe Macre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polyphonic history (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Polyphonic history and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Polyphonic history, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrey Pushkarev (DJ) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcguy15 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article seems to be just a second opportunity for promoting the film. As well, there are sourcing issues, like the use of Discogs, Youtube, ImDB, primary sources, and interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrey Pushkarev (DJ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrey Pushkarev (DJ), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 21:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yamatai Honshu Theory (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yamatai Honshu Theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yamatai Honshu Theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 02:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rukiye Sultan (daughter of Murad III) (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rukiye Sultan (daughter of Murad III) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rukiye Sultan (daughter of Murad III), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Styyx^Talk? 15:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robotic Data Automation (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submitted without improvement. The Forbes article is not a reliable source because it was written by a Council Member rather than staff nor is T-Bytes Platforms & Applications as the publisher appears to be a relatively unknown entity. All statements need to be supported by a reliable source and in-depth coverage from multiple reliable sources is needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robotic Data Automation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robotic Data Automation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Manuel Preto

Thanks for your edits there, which I have just noticed. I don’t suppose you speak Portuguese? In any event thanks for helping to rescue that pt translation; I am trying to minimize the redlinks at History of São Paulo Elinruby (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes I don't know Portugese, please help me with it. I was trying to rescue a draft without strong knowledge of the subject matter Immanuelle (talk) 22:25, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Orthography of Smal-Stotskyi and Gartner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Orthography of Smal-Stotskyi and Gartner. Thanks! Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Conference on Somali Oil and Gas (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mako001 was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Conference on Somali Oil and Gas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:International Conference on Somali Oil and Gas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Comparison of Lao and Thai has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Comparison of Lao and Thai. Thanks! Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Danil Arkadievich Koretsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Danil Arkadievich Koretsky. Thanks! Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: GSPD (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mako001 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GSPD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:GSPD, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your translations

I greatly appreciate your work to expand Wikipedia with translations from other languages, however, you need to do it properly. Whilst your translations seem quite good and accurate, often the original content has issues, which are retained when you translate it. Sometimes it is things like not adhering to WP:NPOV, other times there are insufficient references, or a serious lack of inline citations. You need to fix the articles up before they can be accepted, and just because they were an article on another language Wikipedia, doesn't mean that they were particularly good. If you take more time to choose the articles you translate (the Ryuku dynasty thing is probably a case of biting off more than you can chew), and fix all issues with them before submitting them to AfC, you will find that they get rejected a lot less often. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

I appreciate this advice. I've noticed it seems to play a role I haven't necessarily paid close attention to. Silken Painting of Emperor Go-Daigo for example is something I thought of as being one of my worst translations, yet it is classified as a B class article because it came from a high quality Japanese original article. On the topic of Kyushu dyansty theory I've decided to just try to translate the article on Takehiko Furuta as it seems better sourced and more critical of his theories. Might redirect Kyushu Dynasty theory there Immanuelle (talk) 15:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Trouted 4

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Immanuelle (talk) 06:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yenisei Inscriptions has been accepted

Yenisei Inscriptions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

I was just looking at the Yenisei Inscriptions page and I was thinking that merging the contents of Elegest inscription and Uyuk-Tarlak inscription into the page would make it a more rounded page. This would allow the page to develop until there is sufficient information for a split. I have also added the Turkic Inscriptions nav template to the Yenisei page.Gusfriend (talk) 07:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Turkic creation myth has been accepted

Turkic creation myth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 20:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erich Kolig (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unquestionably notable under WP:PROF due to his many boooks. The bio section however MUST haverefeences. (and book reviews would help)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erich Kolig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Erich Kolig, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Mass moves from draft to main space

Hi Immanuelle. I'm concerned about the mass moves you're performing from draft to main space. Many of these come after a draftification by a new page reviewer, and without any explanation or any significant improvement to the articles. What's your rationale for these? Thank you. Best, MarioGom (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Mengli II from draftspace

Thank you for moving Meñli II Giray from draftspace. You saved me a bit of trouble. You might want to look at Draft:Devlet III Giray and Draft: Saadet IV Giray and see what you think. In my POV the people who moved these to draftspace did not understand that most inner Asian history is poorly documented.Benjamin Trovato (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

If I remember correctly the person who moved it took only 15 seconds in reviewing it based on the logs, and had repetitively done this with about 500 articles a month before having their privileges removed. As they draftified about 20 of my articles like this I decided to look through and try to rescue the other articles they did this with. Immanuelle (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Careful. What you're doing seems to be a form of retaliation and to prove a WP:POINT. As a NPP reviewer, I think your mass reversal of draftifications is disruptive. MarioGom (talk) 14:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danil Arkadievich Koretsky (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is a lot of unsourced content in the submission, for example only some of the awards are listed in the source. All statements need to be sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danil Arkadievich Koretsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danil Arkadievich Koretsky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glasgow Caledonian University RFC (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:NSPORT, teams must establish notability via the general WP:GNG criteria, requiring significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. All the sources cited here are primary, and most are GCU-related ie. too close to the subject. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glasgow Caledonian University RFC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glasgow Caledonian University RFC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Символика Велесова круга.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Символика Велесова круга.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyushu Dynasty Theory (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

poorly sourced and inappropriate tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyushu Dynasty Theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyushu Dynasty Theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Request

Please make a detailed article about arupyadhatu (formless realm) like you did about six paths this is humble request of devout thirvada buddhist please accept it Joel binu (talk) 09:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

@Joel binu thank you for the request, I will work on making one right now Immanuelle please tag me (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

@Joel binu I created it at Formless Realm but warning it is a lot lower quality than Six Paths as the articles in foreign languages on it are substantially worse. I hope we might be able to better work with it later Immanuelle please tag me (talk) 03:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Arupyadhatu

Why you do not make arupyadhatu (formless realm article till now Joel binu (talk) 12:42, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Joel binu I made one just now and it was deleted. We will need more available content and citations in order to make a new one Immanuelle please tag me (talk) 15:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Muslim privilege

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Muslim privilege.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

References to Lapidus are missing. Only two references directly address Muslim privilege; Muslim conspiracy (mentioned in a number of references) cannot be related directly nor indirectly to Muslim privilege. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:A genealogical tree based on the Kojiki

Template:A genealogical tree based on the Kojiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Trouted 5

Name change completed. Here's my first signed post as my irl name

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Immanuelle please tag me (talk) 08:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daijosai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reigen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Trouted 6

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Not archiving your page Immanuelle (please tag me) 20:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Signature test

Testing Immanuelle💗 (please tag me) 19:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Soul loss for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soul loss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul loss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Acous mana 20:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timofey Sergeytsev

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Timofey Sergeytsev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 20:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Timofey Sergeytsev moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Timofey Sergeytsev, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your article Kyodo Shoku

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Kyodo Shoku to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 22:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

To clarify: if you are planning to submit a translated article, please translate text before creating the page. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 22:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I did it to get around a problem with the translation tool, will explain more later Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 23:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Shinto nationalization

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Shinto nationalization.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references. The references should be significant coverage of this movement. See WP:SIGCOV

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crown Tribunal in Lublin (May 2)

Moved from User talk:MaitreyaVaruna

💜 melecie talk - 02:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Definitely needs more citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crown Tribunal in Lublin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crown Tribunal in Lublin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🚂Locomotive207-talk🚂 01:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, MaitreyaVaruna! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🚂Locomotive207-talk🚂 01:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Himetataraisuzu-hime has been accepted

Himetataraisuzu-hime, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 10:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)