User talk:Husond/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Reply

Thanks a lot, I also have to say that you made my day :)) Because of my father's work I lived in Saudi Arabia and the US growing up and now I practice law in France, it has been quite a ride you know :) Thank you for your kindness :)) Baristarim 01:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome. Best regards.--Hús ö nd 01:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

Happy to help. All in a night's work at Wikipedia. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks

Hi, Husond, and thanks for supporting me in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 00:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Midian reverts with VP

For some reason, two of your three reverts to Midian left several sections missing. While they did revert previous edits, the most recent (blanking) edit was retained. --Eliyak T·C 15:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing and fixing. This probably occurred because the vandal I was reverting made a second edit (removing that content) at the same time I was reverting his first edit (at 23:52). This sometimes causes VP to revert only the first vandalism, while the 2nd one goes unnoticed. Quite a hassle, I'm glad you spotted this. Thank you.--Hús ö nd 16:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks a lot for the barnstar! It was quite unexpected. --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 ^{talk contribs Count} 01:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Thanks for the greeting, Husond. I'll register sometime in the near future.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.51.93.110 (talk • contribs) .

editing acne

I had no intention of vandalising the article. I made an edit and when i tried to upload it got a message saying 'loss of session data' i will make the edit again later. Now I have to work. Lgh 04:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Good question. The userpage appears to be for a class project (check out the page history). I'd suggest that it is probably not in bad faith...just a misinterpetation of the goals of Wikipedia. That said, the userpage obviously violates userpage guidelines and Wikipedia is not a free webhost and should be deleted. I've added my opinion (using some of this paragraph, actually) to [1]] Regards, alphaChimp^(talk) 03:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why did you make this edit? It was a good edit, you didn't provide any reason to revert it. Qutezuce 03:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing. It was indeed a mistake. I mistook that '''Bold text''' for another thing. I should have paid more attention, and I will record this mistake. Once again, thanks for alerting me. Best regards. --Hús ö nd 04:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion

Hi. I noticed the suggestion you made while closing the bitter move proposal debate on Talk:Păuleşti, Vrancea. Does that mean that one may simply request the creation of a bot that could create a redirect page without diacritics for every article that contains them in the title? That sounds like a very good solution, but is it really that simple? And is there a way to find out if such bot has been created already? Thank you. Regards.--Hús ö nd 19:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well it would be very simple to request a bot to do that at WP:BOTREQ. Finding anyone to actually take on that task might be a different story! :) I've looked into creating my own bots (I'm a software engineer by trade) but never looked closely enough to determine what the rules are. I know you need to get someone to make the bot and then the bot maker needs to get a beureaucrat to approve the bot for a "bot flag". That way, the bot won't flood the recent changes log, etc. Admins are instructed to block unapproved bots on sight. If you've ever seen a Willy on Wheels attack, the moves happen so fast that it is definitely a malicious unapproved bot doing the page moves.

Anyway, I'd recommend adding an entry at WP:BOTREQ and then maybe contact your favorite bot creator for an opinion. Good luck. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi Husond. Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. I really appreciate it! --Alan Au 20:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged copyvio

As I understand it, quoting partial lyrics in the context of analysis is acceptable, according to Wikipedia:Lyrics_and_poetry. At the very least you could've had the decency to leave the original explanatory text I had spent several minutes composing in its place, rather than high-handedly removing the lot. Very disappointing, and a poor exercise of editorship. - 82.152.178.205 17:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I was actually in doubt after my second reversion, because you did add some explanatory material to the lyrics, and it was indeed not an exact copy of the lyrics. But try to understand that fans of artists often try to insert their lyrics and that's to be promptly reverted for copyvio. Maybe it's not your case and I apologize for the reversions. Also, try to understand that we revert hundreds of edits and sometimes we do commit mistakes. So it's good you contacted me. I will restore your edit if you have not done so yet. Regards. --Hús ö nd 17:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Maybe I should've added them more in prose style with the text, rather than separating them out - I see most of the examples have them in the body text. Anyway, no probs. - 82.152.178.205 17:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Deletions

The two links I added to the Orgasm page were from the sites of noted Sex Researcher and internationally syndicated broadcaster Sue McGarvie. There is a ton of free content on both sites which relates specifically to the content being discussed in the article... certianly more than is available in the some of the sites you already have listed. Just because a site has a commercial side as well, does not mean that it fails to contain informative and educational material. These links were not spam.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.191.28.185 (talk • contribs) .

Thank you for your query. I once again analysed the links you added to the article Orgasm, but I am sorry to inform that they do not conform to Wikipedia's policies regarding external links (See WP:EL and WP:SPAM for reference). Your links may not be inserted for the following reasons:

*They are not specific to the subject of the article (Orgasm).

*They contain a shopping section with recommended products.

If within the sites you provided exist subpages with ad-free content about orgasm, you are welcome to add links to those specific pages. But the main websites easily qualify as spam, and definitely inadequate for the article Orgasm. Consider checking the article Sexuality as a more suitable choice. Once again, thank you for contacting me. Regards.--Hús ö nd 02:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: When inserting a comment on a user's talk page, please place it in the bottom of the page instead of in the beginning, and please sign your comment by simply typing four tildes "~~~~".

Caption competition

Hi Dfrg. I was just wondering if you set a deadline for the caption competition. When you can, please provide further instructions about the evaluation procedure. The competetion was a great idea btw. Best regards.--Hús ö nd 03:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... a deadline. Well, today it is the 4th so, perhaps on the 13th? That should be enough time. Judging can begin then and go for two days. It would be great if lots of people, not just those who frequent the Coffee lounge get to see and enter. Hmmmm....

Already covered: Scores will be given out of Ten (Fifty toatal from Five judges). For:

Originality (2)
Humor (6)
Image choice (2)

The winner; as well as being given a year supply of Coffee and a years supply of lounge will recive the DFRTurnip Tropy®. But then, it's not about the wining or the fabulous Turnip, it's about having a go and having some fun.

Scores could be expressed perhaps in a box:

Dfrg.msc - 7/10

Husond - 8/10

IAMTHEEGGMAN - 6/10

Crazytales - 5/10

SaturnYoshi - 4/10

Total - 30/50

Just fill in! Winner has the highest score. How do I get them to go right?

Ergo template:

Captions

This User is a Judge in the Esperanza Caption Competition.

Only large bribes are accepted.

Hope that answers your questions - feel free to talk to me about anything more. Thanks, Dfrg.m s c ^{1 . 2 . 3} 08:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Husond, sorry for the late reply - I've been out and about recently (as you can see by my Gallery). Well I talked to crazytales, but no reply as yet. If he is not avaliable then we wil need to find a new judge. Thanks, Dfrg.m s c ^{1 . 2 . 3} 22:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Judging Commences within the next 48 Hours

I'm still working on the template thing though, they should be ready soon. Dfrg.m s c ^{1 . 2 . 3} 22:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I was about to give information regarding the Red Arrow and Luminous Path Triad. Sorry for any inconvenience. Exiledone 19:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Père Lachaise Cemetery

I am pretty sure this is not vandalism. - CrazyRussian talk/email 21:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Are you sure you are reporting the right edit? In this edit, 201.141.48.163 inserts his/her signature right in the middle of the article. Wasn't that supposed to be reverted?--Hús ö nd 22:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh now I see, there was some further content that I didn't notice. I'll restore that part. Thanks for noticing.--Hús ö nd 22:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Ahh, thanks. :) I'm terrible at taking compliments without saying something dumb, so I should stop myself before I get to that. But I appreciate it. Keep up the good work, yourself. :) Luna Santin 23:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 66/11/5. I learned quite a bit during the process, and I expect to be learning a lot more in the days ahead. I will be taking things slowly (and doing a lot of re-reading), but I hope you will let me know if there is anything I can do to improve in my new capacity. -- Merope ^Talk 12:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the Cyprus move

Hey man, thanks for the input. I decided to make a separate section on Cyprus's talk page for the article move debate. Feel free to post how you feel about it. :) - Chef Ketone 19:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Husond. I think I got it right this time, but you might want to double-check it! -Chef Ketone 20:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input, Husond. I really want anyone that has an opinion on it to give their input. (You never know, it may happen!) See ya around. - Chef Ketone 20:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Why did you send me a message saying that I was playing, and it has been reverted even though it wasa good edit, nor was it reverted? 72.128.5.160

Sorry. 72.128.5.160

help?

I'm trying to archive my talk page, not delete it. Could you tell me how to do this correctly?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.169.203.114 (talk • contribs) .

Re:Review

Actually, I did install VP, there is just a bug that I have asked about on the discussion page, but haven't gotten a reply yet. I do plan to participate in AfD and RfA more often. Thanks for the review! -- TheGreatLlama ^{(speak to the Llama!)} 16:03, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, whenever I go to an IRC channel, my computer shows the annoying "This page cannot be displayed" page. I've tried refreshing it, but that doesn't work. -- TheGreatLlama ^{(speak to the Llama!)} 16:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Just wanted to send a quick note of thanks for your support in my RfA. :-) I really appreciate it! Best, Irongargoyle 17:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude

Dude, why did u remove my edit on "Frankie Wilde"? He IS a fictional character and it WAS a mockumentary!!! http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/mockumentary

- J—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.99.75.22 (talk • contribs) .

Ferrugem

My usual userpage makes it clear that I am not Brazilian (I know I've temporarily deleted the history that says that.) I just assume that perhaps MTV VJs are almost always notable because there's a list for them, but I have no idea what this guy's done or how long he's been around. AfD sounds good... If it's not deleted someone will end up making it better if he is notable. Google only seems to provide passing mentions. Grand master ka 01:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm kind of flattered you thought I was Brazilian; I would have understood a Portuguese query. I'm from Minneapolis, Minnesota (U.S.) ;-) Grand master ka 01:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cookie!

Thank you for the note. The cookie was good. YUM! :) - Trysha ^(talk) 06:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a tally of 91/1/4. I can't express how much it means to me to become an administrator. I'll work even more and harder to become useful for the community. If you need a helping hand, don't hesitate to contact me. NCurse _work 15:39, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In many languages...

Thank you, Húsönd, for contributing to my in many languages… page! I appreciate it very much, and I will remember you if I have any questions about your language. Thank you again!

"Reporting canvass"

What do you exactly mean by "reporting canvass" in reference to the Armenian rebellions article? I wasn't trying to alert User:Eupator to help nominate it for deletion. This was before I even nominated it. I just wanted to see what he thought. If it was against any sort of rule, then I sincerely apologize. -- Clevelander 09:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! -- Clevelander 18:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Deathmatch

Thanks but there's already an article with the list of celebrity deathmatch episodes so I think the list should be removed from the Celebrity Deathmatch section because it doesn't make sense to have it there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.7.70.244 (talk • contribs) .

Thank you for contacting me. Before continuing to your issue, I must inform that when placing comments on users' talk pages you are expected to insert them in the bottom (not in the beginning) and sign them by simply typing four tildes (~~~~).

Now, after checking both articles I see that you do have a point, there's a list redundancy. I'll deal with it right away. But in the future always give a detailed explanation of your edit in the edit summary, for removal of content by unregistered users is often deemed as vandalism. Anyway I see that you acted in good faith so I removed the warning that I had placed and will deal with the lists now. Regards.--Hús ö nd 23:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trigger finger or robot?

You seem to have created some overeager robot that reverts any edits to your pet articles. My edits to Janusz Głowacki were very innocent, as well as an improvement, changing "Głowacki" to "Glowacki" in the categories. You may not have realized yet that any letters with diacritics are alphabetized after the letter z, so that Mr. Głowacki will show up after, say, Miss Gzyw in those categories. If this was really the work of a robot, I'd find these very unwikipedia-like. It may even be "verboten".Afasmit 01:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Husond! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tucows

Hi you Icelandic man. I saw you reverted the post by 24.252.155.97 on "Tucows". It was obviously not a statement one would want in a encyclopedia, but it has it's relevance. Tucows has a serious (customer- at least)problem after the migration with NetIdentity/NamePlanet. I think it should be mentioned in a form somewhere. See my post under "discussion" on "Tucows". And for instance http://tucowed.blogspot.com

Kai Olav Fredriksen --195.1.58.214 09:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Kirk's RfA

Dear Husond/Archive_2

Thank you very much for voting in my request for adminship. In the end, not many people let their opinion be known, and I didn't get the mop just yet. I have already begun acting on the issues brought up by the community, and will continue to do so. If you have any more suggestions for me, feel free to let me know.
Once again, thank you.
— Gary Kirk // talk! 12:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I thought I should thank everyone, and those who gave reasons I didn't understand, I've asked to clarify. — Gary Kirk // talk! 18:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Brooks

Sorry about the vandalism, but I go to that school and it is full of jerks. I was frustrated with the amount of wiggers, preps and emos in the student body, the lack of adminstartors who actually care about the students educations and the lack of workers who actually perform their jobs properly and do what they say. The staff and Brooks lies and ignores students and parents a ridiculous amount, they tell out right lies to get out of work, for example, a friend of mine was away for a day, she missed a test, the teacher said she could make up the test but it would have to be a different test. The teacher in question promised to make up a new test. The student told her that would be great. The teacher then promply replied, + Sorry about the vandalism, but I go to that school and it is full of jerks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.67.6.142 (talk • contribs) . - "Or I could not do it." Then simply disregarded the whole idea, leaving my friend testless and bringing down her mark. It's unbelievable the level of lies and out right neglect the staff will resort to to avoid work. Absent students are told to plan their absences to get work or have pick up dates to aquire it. The office staff will simply neglect to email teachers about work or help them to pick it up when they arrive for it. They make no effort to find it if THEY lose it. It's ridiculous. That school is pitiful.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.67.6.142 (talk • contribs) .

Re: ABC

Hi, I noticed the message you left on User talk:24.45.45.39 asking the user to be more careful with spelling, grammar and punctuation. Is there a template for that message or did you create it yourself? Sometimes I feel like I could use that. Regards.--Hús ö nd 17:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the template is {{subst:SpellCheck}}. I found it on a list of user warning templates at WP:UTM. This is pretty useful, and covers nearly every category. -Patstuart 17:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

If we are to include "any inhabitant of Bohemia or Moravia." as a parameter for this list, the list needs to be renamed "List of people from Bohemia and Moravia" or "List of people from Czech lands." You cannot add to the definition of "Czech" (an ethnic group) man-made geographic boundaries, as they include many other ethnic groups who are not Czechs, like Gregor Mendel. 141.211.251.69 22:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. However I believe that the article List of Czechs does not focus just on people whose ethnicity is Czech, but anyone who comes from the region composed by Bohemia and Moravia. I can't really see any plausible alternative. You may however try to propose a new name for the article on WP:RM.--Hús ö nd 00:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

I really appreciate your award. I really wasn't expecting that. Jorcoga 04:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed the message you left below my support at Betacommand's RfA. Who is Captain Planet? Jorcoga 08:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I see. Jorcoga 05:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mille gratiae

A thousand thanks!

...for my User Page award/barnstar you gave me on 15/October/2006. It is much appreciated! At least I know hours stuck to my computer screen editing my UserPages weren't in vein ;)

Cheers

--Anthonycfc (Talk to Me)^(sandbox) ^(E-Count) 12:31 29 Apr 2024 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about the vandalism. It won't happen again.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.67.6.142 (talk • contribs) .

Related to your signature

Surpresa em encontrar outro Português por aqui, mas para que outros possam perceber, vou deixar a mensagem em English.

Hello. I've spotted your signature around a welcome to esperanza greeting to a new member. I've noticed it's full of broken HTML. Please, to keep Wp working on every browser, do not use broken HTML, also called tag soup. Wp uses XHTML.

If you need a suggestion, do not use the font tag ever, and neither abuse of div tags. Oh, and always use quots like "". If you still need to use that disgusting Microsoft font in your sigs, please use the following code instead:

<span style="font-face:'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif;">Husond</span>

Hope you understand and won't take offense in me being bold. If you do understand, please help me get other users not to do the same thing and break Wp. Thanks.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} 15:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olá. Obrigado por contactares. Espero que não te importes que eu use português, mas já criei hábito em usar essa língua para comunicar com outros utilizadores portugueses. Se preferires, claro, posso mudar para inglês. Relativamente às sugestões em relação à minha assinatura, não compreendi especificamente o que de errado há com ela. Quando a criei baseei-me nas assinaturas de outros utilizadores, aplicando código bastante comum. Também não consigo detectar broken html. Utilizo três browsers (Netscape, Firefox e IE) e também não verifico nenhum problema na visualização da assinatura. Desconheço porém se occorerão eventualmente problemas com browsers para Mac. De qualquer forma desde que estabeleci a assinatura não fiz intenções de alterar o seu aspecto posteriormente. Estou aberto a alterações ao seu código, desde que produzam exactamente a mesma assinatura. Obrigado pela atenção. :-) Cumprimentos.--Hús ö nd 16:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Não me importo com o Português; na verdade só não usei pq achei q podias não gostar considerando onde estamos. Como podes ver em cima, eu providenciei código alternativo q podes usar se quiseres. O problema está q a Wp usa XHTML, e a tag não é permitida de modo algum. Lê o artigo tag soup se quiseres perceber o pq de font funcionar nos browsers apesar de ser inválido. Se precisares de mais algum esclarecimento, contacta-me. E tal como já disse anteriormente, se decidires mudar, ajuda-me a convencer outros utilizadores pq quase toda a gente faz este disparate.

p.s: Decidi mudar o código da tua assinatura na mensagem em cima. Usa o edit para veres as diferenças. Espero q isso ajude.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} 10:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compreendo. Seria possível criares-me uma réplica da minha assinatura com o código válido? Se a visualização da assinatura ficar igual, naturalmente não terei qualquer problema em mudar a sintaxe. A propósito, comandos como o font são comuns não apenas em assinaturas. Vou ver se encontro um sítio adequado para comunicar a mais utilizadores este problema. Obrigado. Cumprimentos.--Hús ö nd 17:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--[[User:Husond|Hús]][[User:Husond/Esperanza|ö]][[User talk:Husond|nd]]

Tá ai em cima. Acho q vou criar um template do género "por uma Wikipedia válida, não use HTML mal feito". Depois vê-se.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} 20:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado por forneceres o código. No entanto, a assinatura que ele produz revela-se muito diferente (cores diferentes, e aparece sublinhada). :-/ A ideia do template não parece má. Sugiro também que exponhas a situação em Wikipedia talk:Sign your posts on talk pages, onde poderá ser directamente discutida com outros utilizadores e eventualmente incluída nas alíneas do guia de assinatura. Cumprimentos.--Hús ö nd 21:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Não sei do q tás a falar. A mim as assinaturas aparecem exactamente iguais. Provavelmente tás a usar o Internet Explorer ou assim, um browser q não consegue ler código decentemente e é por muitos designado de o cancro da Internet. Não te posso ajudar muito mais. Tu podes fazer experiências com o código q te dei modificando as cores e/ou retirando o text-decoration:underline; e ver o q dá. Mas essa iniciativa teria q vir de ti; não posso nem devo ser eu a obrigar-te a mudar e a fazer experiências, mas obrigado pelo interesse na mudança. Ah, e obrigado também pelo link; vou tentar a minha sorte por lá.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} 09:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

B-day

Thanks for the b-day wishes. =) Nishkid64 19:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for [2] Garion96 (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hey, First off thank you for welcoming me to esperanza! :) I feel welcomed already.

Secondly though, I can't get my signature to work correctly. My name is lithpiperpilot, and the lithpip dosen't have a link to anything, and then the erpilot only links to my esperanza page. If you could please help me so it is like your signature with the first part being your user page, then esperanza, then talk page, I would really appreciate it. Thank you in advance! Lithpiperpilot 21:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. It's all set up now. I can't wait to get involved in esperanza. Lithpiperpilot 23:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Your revert

You have reverted this edit. This was a valid edit. It was in the sandbox. Template:X2 is a template sandbox, see it. 72.139.119.165 23:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I was not aware of the existence of this template. It's good you contacted me. I apologize for the misstep. Regards.--Hús ö nd 00:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Trying to reach an infobox consensus here: [3]. Please can you weigh-in with your opinion? SureFire 00:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed on October 17, 2006 with a tally of 53/6/0. I am equally elated and humbled by my new capacity as administrator of Wikipedia, and I send my heartfelt thanks for your unflinching support. If you need me for anything, just ask me! With gratitude, ²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza

Hey, I figure you'd be a good person to ask... The Esperanza charter mentions that I need to have been registered on Wikipedia for 14 days before I can join. Would I get away with joining now considering my edit history, or should I just wait another 6 days? :) Pursey 04:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA thanks

Hi, Husond! Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 75/0/1! I hope I can live up to the standards of adminship, and I will try my best to make Wikipedia a better place. Feel free to send me a message if you need any assistance. :)

--Core des at 15:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Announcement: It's an administrator!

Husond, thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was a robust 62/1/1, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any questions about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks again, Chris Griswold

I do want to make sure you know that although in the weeks prior to the RfA,I might not have been as aggressive in fighting vandals or particicpating in XfDs, I have been so before, and I have taken your comments as a reminder to re-commit myself to those activities. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 21:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]