User talk:Huntster/Archive 44

Archive 40

←

Archive 42

Archive 43

Archive 44

Orphaned non-free image File:EvLithium1cover01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EvLithium1cover01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship	from the Birthday Committee
Wishing Huntster a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! -- Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Happy Belated Adminship Anniversary!

Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 11:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Help with HST / JWST comparison images

If still available - any Help appreciated - seems an editor "User:Yann" has changed, without "WP:CONSENSUS", aligned comparison images from "HST" and "JWST" - particularly, the aligned comparison images, "File:NASA-HubbleSpaceTelescope-DeepField-2017.jpg" with the equivalent "File:NASA-JWST-FirstDeepField-20220712.png" ) - to non-aligned image(s) instead (examples => "File:Main image deep field smacs0723.png" or "File:Webb's First Deep Field.jpg" ) - for related details, please see talk at => https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Drbogdan#Webb's_First_Deep_Field - and => https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Drbogdan#Comparison_of_images

Articles of concern include:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope#Scientific_results - and →
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webb's_First_Deep_Field#Comparison_with_the_Hubble_Space_Telescope - and →
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_cluster#Gallery - and →
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMACS_J0723.3–7327 - and →
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deep_fields - and →
6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_light_(astronomy)#Historical_examples

hope this can be sorted out -

Thanks in advance for your help with this - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 14:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Drbogdan, this appears to be a weirdly pedantic JPG vs. PNG issue, when I doubt either is the original format (which is normally FITS or similar). But, in my experience, this isn't something worth pushing back on. I would recommend just cropping down a JPG version of the "correct" JWST image to a new filename (don't overwrite) and using that. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thanks for your reply - it's appreciated - yes - aware of related FITS, TIFF and JPG images - may end up doing this at some opportunity - Thanks again for your comments - they're *greatly* appreciated - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

I've switched out the previous image for the new adjusted JPG: File:Webb's First Deep Field (adjusted).jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 07:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I also think that creating a cropped version of the JPEG file is the best solution. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

@Huntster and Yann: Yes - *entirely* agree - the newly created cropped JPG version ("File:Webb's First Deep Field (adjusted).jpg") seems an *excellent* solution to the concern(s) - no problem whatsoever - (Note: also noted as  Done at => "Talk:James Webb Space Telescope#Help with HST / JWST comparison images") - in any case - Thank You *very much* for the effort - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 12:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Happy Eighteenth First Edit Day!

Hey, Huntster. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Help with "CEERS-93316" image

[ Note: this may be a better location for the post - earlier original post at => https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Huntster#Help_with_%22CEERS-93316%22_image ]

Help if possible - "CEERS-93316" is the earliest galaxy candidate found so far (z=16.7) - Question: Is the related image ( presented at several websites, including "BBC News" at => https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-62311562 ) ok for the Wikipedia "CEERS-93316" article or not? - seems the "CEERS Collaboration" and the new "James Webb Space Telescope" are involved - and both may be related to "NASA" in some way - but unable to find a clear indication of image copyright conditions at the moment - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 16:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Trying to get WikiProject Amateur Radio back on the air!

Hi, I'm Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} and I'm currently doing my best to resurrect the amateur radio WikiProject. A lot of the articles need some serious work and so I'm trying to organize an article improvement drive in October. If you're interested check out the link to the drive and the project page. Right now everything is in the planning stages, trying to find people interested, articles to focus on, etc. So if you know anyone who would like to help out feel free to invite them! If you no longer interested in this project that's a-ok just remove yourself from the list on the project page and I'll never badger you again. 73! Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 00:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Rhea Seddon

Hi there! I'm working on getting a series of articles on women astronauts through FAC. I've already done Sally Ride, Judith Resnik and Kathryn Sullivan, so next up is Rhea Seddon. I need a co-nominator at FAC, and apparently you're the next largest contributor after myself that is still active. This requires no effort on your part - I will do all the work - but you'll be limited to only nominating one article of your own until it is promoted, which usually takes about three months. Let me know if you are willing to co-nominate. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Perry County

Hello! You should take a look at Perry County, Tennessee. 'Tis now a GA. nf utvol (talk) 02:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

@Nfutvol: Outstanding! It looks really good. Very well done. — Huntster (t @ c) 06:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice because that person didn't take care of it

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Wait, I'm dumb, the user is referring to socks you blocked. Still, this may concern you since you did block them. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

@LilianaUwU It's all good, thank you for the notification :) I also appreciate the username, hehe! — Huntster (t @ c) 22:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

File:ExoMars 2016 TGO and EDM trans-small.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ExoMars 2016 TGO and EDM trans-small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)