User talk:Humperdoo

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Humperdoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Vietnam War in film. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 01:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vietnam War in film, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam War in film[edit]

You need to discuss your concerns for the article on the articles talk page, not mine. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vietnam War in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Vietnam War in film. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.

Not notable, list entries require their own article - FlightTime (open channel) 16:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Berean Hunter. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Fall of Saigon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding fancruft to articles on serious subjects. It is uncited trivia which is not germane to the real article subject.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of World War I video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iron Storm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of World War I video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A House Divided (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Humperdoo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

V-pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jack, N9, MBK, The Bell and The Men

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jidaigeki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vietnam War in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Todd Robinson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for Second Sino-Japanese War[edit]

Hey, I´ve seen you adding a great deal to Template:Campaignbox Second Sino-Japanese War. I don´t really have a stake at this but I think what you´re doing is very much going against the purpose of a campaignbox template, both in scope and in size, and thus not helpful. With all that additional material, wouldn´t it make more sense to use it to make a full and segmented template, like e.g. Template:American Civil War or Template:World War II? Just a suggestion of course ...GELongstreet (talk) 06:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, It would make more sense. Could you change it for me please ? Humperdoo (talk) 06:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Am working on it. Give me a few hours to make a start, then you can expand and implement it. ...GELongstreet (talk) 07:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, has been created as Template:Second Sino-Japanese War. It is far from finished though and thus is awaiting your work. ...GELongstreet (talk) 11:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of massacres in China. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2013 Depsang standoff, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 23:14, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 00:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Chinese wars and battles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Đồng Đăng.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign boxes[edit]

Hello, I've just reverted your addition of multiple campaign boxes to a range of articles. In general campaign boxes should be fairly specific to the battle/campaign covered by the article. Adding multiple campaign boxes is not likely to be helpful to readers, and is generally not necessary as the boxes include links to their 'parent' campaign/war. Campaign boxes should also only generally be added in articles where the article is linked in the box - their role is to help readers navigate fairly closely related articles, not to serve as a general set of links (which standard linking achieves). I've also reverted some changes where you added items to campaign boxes that are not relevant to the theme of the box. Please take greater care with this type of editing, especially when you are doing it at a very high volume, as this is essentially disruptive editing which can lead to blocks. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 08:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Protagonists of Chinese descent in Japanese anime has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Protagonists of Chinese descent in Japanese anime has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Japanese anime set in a fictional world reminiscent of Ancient China and Imperial China[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Japanese anime set in a fictional world reminiscent of Ancient China and Imperial China indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 23:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]