User talk:Honestyisbest

"offensive personal comments"?[edit]

Hi, on the Senator Stoker talkpage[1] you made the claim "Stop your offensive personal comments". What comments directed at you are you referring to? CatCafe (talk) 00:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stay off my talk page. Honestyisbest (talk) 00:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Your recent editing history at Amanda Stoker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Bilorv (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 16:13, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 50-edit edit war at Amanda Stoker. Thank you. — Bilorv (talk) 07:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sept 2021[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Honestyisbest. Thank you.

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Patriciamoorehead per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Honestyisbest. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 20:13, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]