User talk:HighKing/Archives/2023/March
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey, HighKing,
Please remember to sign your comments. It's a rare mistake but I thought I'd mention it. Thanks again for your contributions. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
AfD question
Curious, as I may have some old CORPs to bring to AfD as I work through old COI templates, is it better to always drop a quick source summary highlighting each as part of the nomination, as a new comment, or wait to see where the AfD is going? I usually go for brief statement, but seeing how long it took to get someone to respond, wondering if I need a better appoach. Slywriter (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Since an AfD (GNG/NCORP specifically) is normally decided on the quality of sourcing, it is best to at least mention in a nomination and perhaps provide some reasoning as to why you believe the sourcing doesn't meet the criteria. If a deeper analysis is required due to comments, then you always have that option. HighKing++ 14:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)