User talk:Heyguysimjakob

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Heyguysimjakob, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CherryX (talk) 23:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Jschnur. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Adelaide United FC, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jschnur (talk) 11:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

You cannot simply add unsourced content to articles, as you did at Melbourne Heart FC. Please read about reliable sourcing here. HiLo48 (talk)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Panathinaikos F.C., without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Kosm1 fent 18:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heyguysimjakob, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Heyguysimjakob! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Panathinaikos F.C.. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Kosm1 fent 06:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Football club attendances (2012), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hack (talk) 05:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hack (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Please begin adding sources for information that you add, and especially please do not add information that looks sourced but is not. Nyttend (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heyguysimjakob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I added unsourced information that I thought was correct but I now understand the proper Wikipedia practices and rules

Decline reason:

What practices and rules do you understand? Anyone can say, "oh, I get it now, unblock me"; what we need to see is evidence that you know which rules you broke, what they say and why they are important. If you wish to be unblocked, please post a new request explaining your newfound understanding. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for January 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treble (association football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

A-league Rivalry Cups, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]