User talk:Gulmammad/archive 1

AfD nomination of A. P. Balachandran

An editor has nominated A. P. Balachandran, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. P. Balachandran and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

New article announcements

Hi Gulmammad

Please note that you can announce new Azerbaijan related articles created by you or anyone else here: Portal:Azerbaijan/New article announcements. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Regards, Grandmaster (talk) 06:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Logo of ans.jpg

Hi. Sorry, I just noticed your message, it was right under the arbcom message so I did not see it immediately. Copyright is a serious problem here, so we need to provide a good substantiation of he copyright status. I'll check to see if the logo can be used here. Grandmaster (talk) 06:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Silav

Birayê xweşdivî, Ez pir şa bûm bi dîtina rûpela te li vir. Herwusa, çava min bi gotara ku we nivîsîye (Shamil Askerov) ket. Wesa dîyare kû hûn agahiyên baş û zelal hene derbarê keltûr û çanda kurdî li welatê Azerbaycanê. Heke serçavên te hene li ser wî babetê, tikaye alîkariyê min bide. Pir sipas.Heja Helweda (talk) 04:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Me

ROFL, you think I'm ARMENIAN? Wow. Also, please show me where my maps of Kalbajar are incorrect. If you want to "clean up my garbage" and "stop me", by all means, please go to WP:RFC so they may laugh at you as well. --Golbez (talk) 19:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes You

So you are not Armenian ( I am sure you are not either Azerbaijani) but you are very much interested in uploading maps of administrative districts of Azerbaijan in which half of Kalbajar is shown as a part of so-called Nagorno-Karabakh. If you disagree with me, see [1] or see map of Kalbajar before it was occupied by Armenia. Please don't upload maps that you drew according your dreams but refer to the official documents. I call those maps that you uploaded nothing but garbage unless you provide with official sources. If you insist on that those fake maps are correct, you are going to have a trouble as an editor Golbez -- a third party administrator. -Gulmammad (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The map shows the area of Azerbaijan that they claim but do not control, just as maps of China show land they claim but do not own, same with Taiwan. Believe it or not, but Nagorno-Karabakh exists, even if only as a place Armenia occupies. "nothing but garbage" is very nice, have a cookie. Perhaps you should discuss this with the various Azerbaijani editors who for the last few years have had no problem with those maps? Perhaps you would like us to delete our articles on everything Nagorno-Karabakh? Yes, I insist they are correct, I look forward to your hilarious attempts to do... something to me, who knows. --Golbez (talk) 00:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Your map had better not show the half of Kalbajar as a part of so-called Nagorno-Karabakh in the article about Kalbajar. You could put it only on the article about Nagorno-Karabakh, a region which is being claimed by separatist Armenians in the region, and not recognized by any country in the world! But you have included that region to all maps of administrative regions of Azerbaijan. There is nothing called Nagorno-Karabakh as an administrative region of Azerbaijan but instead Khojavend, Shusha, Khojali and Tartar. Your maps are not still valid and for now they are garbage, showing the dreams of Armenian ideologists. When Nagorno-Karabakh is recognized by world community, then you will put them in wiki OK? --Gulmammad (talk) 01:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Nah. They've stayed there for years, you won't stop them. If you want to, by the way, please review the Azeri/Armenian arbitration, and I also suggest you communicate more with the other Azeri users. --Golbez (talk) 01:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I strongly require from you to provide those maps with official sources! I also can draw many maps as I wish and upload to wiki, that will be my work but not document! You did what I am telling and up to now no-one has noticed about your fake maps! In Wikipedia I want to see correct information about anything. Let us not fool wiki users with our self-ideologies! --Gulmammad (talk) 02:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I have to insist you take this directly to WP:RFC, as this will only lead to an edit war. You have to ask the wider community. --Golbez (talk) 03:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar

I just saw the barnstar you gave me — thanks! —David Eppstein (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I saw the the barnstar too, thanks very much. Regards, Grandmaster (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Azerbaijani passport

Two changes should be made in relation to the photo of the Azerbaijani passport which is in the Types of passports section: (1) The caption should be changed to "Inside front cover and first page of a non-biometric Azerbaijani passport". That's what's in the photo. (2) The photo, which is near the text about emergency passports, should be moved up, so that it is near the text about ordinary passports, because that's what the photo illustrates. Passportman (3/4/2008) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.40.137.197 (talk) 05:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Facts about Mohammed El Naschie

Facts about Mohamed El Naschie

This Dear Sir, I'm a wikipedia user (nasr2000) who created the article about prof. El Naschie. Prof. El Naschie asked me to remove the article completely from wikipedia as some people are hacking it continuously. I discovered that , although i'm the creator of the article, it is not allowed for me to remove it!! can you please help me in removing this article as soon as possible as he doesn't want an article about him on wiki which anyone can edit.

Well, as a former student of professor M El Naschie and as a doctorate student in Quantum gravity and related fields in UK, i can say that prof. el naschie is a WELL KNOWN scientist and very respected in his field of research. he is one of the most prominent researchers in his field.

I'm looking forward to hearing from you and thank you in advance —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasr2000 (talk • contribs) 11:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

i'm not insulting you, you told me (impolite) first, didn't you? if you consider this word an isult then why did you tell me it?! you should respect people if you want people to respect you. I don't like to insult anyone and haven't done that at all before. i just told you what you told me just to realize that (impolite means an insult) and you did realize because you got very angry from it exactly like i got when i read it!!

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gulmammad" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.240.229.68 (talk) 15:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

M. S. El Naschie

i don't know how wiki administrators lestin to any jealous or malicious person. you should investigate by yourself about what faragali said. all of what he said is completely wring and just some lies. prof. el naschie main contributions are in the field of chaos and fractals so it is more convenient for his papers to be published in Chaos, solitons and fractals. he also has some papers published in other journals. if you want to delete the article delete it immediately without putting this deletion marks which is considered as an insult to Prof. el naschie. insulting famous and respected people like that is punishable by law and Prof. el naschie is going to take a legal actions if you don't stop that. he wants you to delete the article because he is well known without wikipedia, he doesn't need wikipedia to be known. i created the article for him and unfortunately cannot delete it. can you please delete el naschie article which i created? thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasr2000 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

• Yes, I investigated by myself and nominated the article for deletion. Thanks --Gulmammad (talk) 18:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I had just left a comment for you on the talk page of this article. What you say makes a lot of sense and I agree that it doesn't appear the article meets our requirements. I suggested that perhaps you would like to open a deletion discussion. Thanks for the information. Shell ^babelfish 18:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

You didn't finish the AfD for M. S. El Naschie, I fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I was trying to figure out the third step. It is my first time... --Gulmammad (talk) 03:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Use of Rollback

Please rollback only for reverting vandalism. Please do not use rollback for content disputes as you have done numerous times in Lachin. Please see WP:ROLL for more information. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 03:37, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

I've used the rollback tool to revert edits by 83.217.229.146, 91.103.28.248, and 212.73.95.1. I realized that the editor behind these IP addresses is almost professional editor in Wikipedia but doesn't want to appear with a real username. And I believe I've done something correct. However, I found some parts of edit that was done by 91.103.28.248 had believable sources and I've just placed them back to the article Lachin. --Gulmammad (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Please defend your use of Rollback here. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 21:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

I defended my use of the Rollback there. If you need something more, let me know.
--Gulmammad (talk) 00:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Gulmammad: Then that needs to be said in a edit summary, which you will now have to do as your rollback has been temporarily removed. Tiptoety ^talk 21:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Gulmammad, I am taking Tiptoety's advise to discuss this matter directly with you. Articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan are of a very sensitive nature. Please exercise great care when reverting or making controversial edits. Discuss your controversial edits and reverts in the talk page. It is very important that you always use useful edit summaries and avoid using edit summaries like "are you looking for a place to put armenian related information?)". Most of the editors who edit Armenia-Azerbaijan articles confine themselves or are confined to one revert per week per article. If you find that someone reverts you, discuss the matter in the talk page rather than reverting back. I hope this helps. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 01:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I haven't had so much info about Armenian-Azerbaijan related articles since I haven't participated in any of WP:ARBAA as you might have had. I wander why you defend so much edits those were made by unknown IP's? Why you haven't warned (as I am going to do) any of them for removing sourced information from the article many times such as this by 212.73.95.1, which after my revert was repeated here by 83.217.229.146. Instead you have been trying very hard to take my right of using the rollback tool and to put me under supervised editing for reverting them using the rollback. Is this action of you constructive?
--Gulmammad (talk) 01:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I had asked you nicely to stop using rollback and you simply switched to using undo without leaving any comment. That is why I posted about getting you put on supervised editing. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Pocopocopocopoco, at this time I do not think that Gulmammad's actions warrant him being placed on supervised editing. Hopefully he has learned his lesson and will be more careful in the future. Tiptoety ^talk 04:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I have no intentions of commenting on the situation. I'm just here to say that if you get the rollback function back, you can put importScript('User:Gracenotes/rollback.js'); into your monobook.js page. Then you can use an edit summary when rolling back edits from a diff. That would prevent this problem from popping up in the future :) --Cheers -The Hybrid- 08:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. Cheers :) -The Hybrid- 02:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Please respond here. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 01:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry for being so late, I saw someone else has already responded. Just to remind you, this is the second time you calumniate me. Seems again it didn't work. --Gulmammad- 13:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

User page

Don't worry, you're welcome to copy any elements of my user page. Actually, Master of Puppets did most of the design, which he volunteered to do for me. I'm not that great of a designer, so I really appreciated his help. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Before my page was such boring I wanted even to stop editing:) Gülməmməd ^Talk

Edit warring, notice of discretionary sanctions

As you seem to be engaged in edit warring in an area covered by an arbitration committee case, this is to be your warning that discretionary sanctions, as provided in this case may be applied to you. Specifically, further edit warring may lead to a block from editing, or a temporary ban from editing articles on which edit wars have taken place. Please make sure to use dispute resolution rather than engaging in repeated reverts. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

El Naschie

Hey writer of the above article, I just want others to know that you are ignorant to attack one of the World's, and certainly the Eastern Worlds' premier scientists. Mohamed El Naschie was trained as a Civil Engineer, with an emphasis on structural mechanics. He achieved international fame, as well as fortune, in a short period of time during which individuals like your good self would have probably spent cooking up lies about others. Once he resolved a number of critical issues in mechanics, his inquisitive mind led him to start reading in physics. How many researchers made the transition from structural engineering to pure physics, and achieved international recognition of their work in both within 20 years? ONLY Mohamed El Naschie. That he does not have ANY degree in physics is indeed his Miracle, not a point to be ashamed of. I was sitting next to the late Ilya Prigogine, Professor at the University of Brussels, I think, and a Nobel Laureate (1977), when Mohamed El Naschie was giving a lecture, using the black board and a piece of chalk. I MYSELF, WITH MY OWN EARS, heard him say "If this is proven completely, this is a Nobel Prize'. Enough said about your slander! And YES, Mohamed El Naschie was honored in China like very very few are, and a whole conference, to which I was invited but could not go, was held in his honor and named after him. What is the standing of the Conference Chair is really not an important issue, but for people like you. Finally, why does El Naschie publish in his own journal? Simple, if I had a shop selling cars, and I was the best car manufacturer in the world, why bless other shops with my cars? I would place my cars in my shop. Mohamed's work is simply brilliant, so he promotes his Journal, as if it needs promotion, by publishing his work in his Journal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scorpion300 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I am confused with the statement "writer of the above article". Please would you make clear that it refers to which article. There are thousands of scientists with the same capabilities as El Naschie. What mostly affected me to nominate the article for deletion was the fact that this author has published about 300 papers and got 29 citations, most probably by himself in his own papers. If almost no-one cites his works, they don't play any role in the development of the science, then they are apparently useless, and we don't need to have an article about such scientists in encyclopedia. Gülməmməd ^Talk 16:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

It is close to 40 years since I have been a close friend of ElNaschie. My admiration for him as a person endowed with 'beautiful' mind and an enormous heart has constantly increased. His innate talent for numbers and mathemetics has enabled him to acquire virtuosic mathematical skills akin to those of Paganini with the violin. Such a talent is an enormous asset if one is to delve deeply into the realm of mathematical physics. True he was once an engineer but with this talent and a searching and manifold mind he discovered that his true love lay in the field of general physics and in particular the elusive and challenging problem of the unification of the forces of nature. He has taken up the challenge and achieved brilliant results acknowledged by leading researchers in this field throughout the world. That some of his papers have topped the citation list speaks for itself. There are some who criticize him for his prolific publications; surely this is out of sheer malice and envy. For that matter should we scoff at Mozart or Bach for their prolificity? To be the target of the mudslingers and racists is no novelty: it is a necessary evil on the road to glory. Many of the great names in science (and other disciplines for that matter) have had to endure the slings and arrows of their contemporary rivals-Boltzman, Becquerel, Jenner and Einstein are a few names that come immediately to mind. So be it with ElNaschie, a man who to me, to borrow Blake's words, holds infinity in the palm of his hands and sees eternity in an hour. To him I say be patient, time will certainly vindicate you.

Asser Zaky, F.Inst.Phys., LFIEEE Emeritus Professor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scorpion300 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Sagure

I'm puzzled at your latest edits. (1) It's the standard of all of the towns in Ethiopia to be listed by Region & Zone, both of which are official subdivisions; the category "town" only duplicates the info at the top of the infobox. (2) Using commas when quoting a number in thousands under 10,000 is a common practice, & standard over the other articles on Ethiopian towns. (3) There's nothing wrong with redlinks in an article in fact, they are encouraged for they suggest new articles; further the CADU is a notable organization that promoted economic development in Ethiopia. -- llywrch (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Since you are more familiar with the African related articles, I encourage you to go ahead and correct what you think is wrong. Regarding the red link, there is a tendency that there shouldn't be redlinks in articles because it makes articles look somehow ugly. Removal of the redlinks don't mean the topic is not important. Cheers, Gülməmməd ^Talk 19:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Edit warring

You're getting dangerously close to officially edit warring with User:Pocopocopocopoco on Sheylanli. Be careful. Tan | 39 03:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, do I? I didn't realize that this would be considered almost edit warring. I'll try to be more careful in the future when editing Sheylanli. Gülməmməd ^Talk 04:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Refactor on RS/N

Gulmammad, please refactor your commentary on the RS/N. It is not considered appropriate to split someone else's comments as you have done, and quite frankly due to your signature it is even harder to read the conversation. Please add your commentary after the posting instead of breaking it apart.PelleSmith (talk) 04:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

It's done. Thank you, but I think you envied my signature as you don't have one :). Cheers, Gülməmməd ^Talk 04:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I have no objection to the sig, its just BIG and fancy which made it messier to look at in so many places at once. Looks good! Cheers.PelleSmith (talk) 14:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Done. The signature has been resized. Best, Gülməmməd ^Talk 14:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

You didn't have to do that just for me :), but I do think it looks better at that size. Best.PelleSmith (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

No, it is okay. If you have any other comments please feel free to left them here then I can change toward "something" better. Cheers, Gülməmməd ^Talk 18:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Wrongway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wrongway.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Your comment and my advice

I would first advise you to be civil. Being dismissive of those who disagree with you, and characterizing them as "playing" or failing to be serious when they evidently intend to be, is not particularly acceptable. It is necessary in order to work collaboratively to listen to the views even of those with whom we may disagree strongly. Concerns based on lack of sourcing are certainly acceptable to bring up. I would advise both you and Poco to keep the discussion on sources, not on one another. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

I just saw your message here since at the same time I received two messages and looked at the last one. Your advices are acceptable and I'll take them into account in the future discussion of the matter. Obviously I missed to take into account your advice in my last respond here - thanks! Gülməmməd ^Talk 15:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Azerbaijan

Hi first of all, thanks for your work on Azerbaijan, if more people followed my example things would develop considerably. Although I am one of the most active editors on this site I'm not actually an admin for a good reason. Now if these editors continue to disrupt the article then they will be blocked. People won't continue to get away with vandalism. Try asking User:Orangemike or somebody to survey the situation. I believe they have to get a final warning before being blocked ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 09:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

I know it can be frustrating, but try to remain calm until it can be sorted. People question reliable sources all the time. If they just got on with it, things would develop a lot quicker. You might want to boost the size of the infobox locator maps though, some of the ones you;ve added look a little small. Try adding this to the infoboxes:

|pushpin_mapsize=300

Have a look at Oghuldara now. Also only use a flag for the country but use {{flag|Azerbaijan}} instead so editors who don't like flags can ignore them in their monobook. Also the native Azeri name should be under native_name= rather than on the top column. See the difference Hope this helps .

♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 09:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

You may want to see Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Places/azerbaijan and help get the articles on towns and villages onto here ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 11:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Your advices are helpful as well for the situation and glad to have such great community around -- thanks to all of you!

In continuation of the project (after mentioned dispute resolved) all your comments will be taken into account. Thanks once again! Gülməmməd ^Talk 15:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks.

Help

I have just got trouble with licensing of two images since I forgot to specify when I was uploading these images: Image:Green lak one.JPG and Image:Green lake two.JPG. I'd like to license them under {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} and appreciate your help. Thank you. Bltrgs ^Talk 00:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheylanli tribe

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Accusations of bad faith like the ones made on this page are not civil. --neon white talk 22:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I'd recommend you to be familiar with the frustrating history of the discussion. Gülməmməd ^Talk 22:17, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Stass Shpanin

I deleted it per WP:CSD#G4, (recreation of deleted material) due to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stass Shpanin. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I see, let it go for now. Later we will think about it if there are some notable changes. Gülməmməd ^Talk 14:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Physics participation

You received this message because your were on the old list of WikiProject Physics participants.

On 2008-06-25, the WikiProject Physics participant list was rewritten from scratch as a way to remove all inactive participants, and to facilitate the coordination of WikiProject Physics efforts. The list now contains more information, is easier to browse, is visually more appealing, and will be maintained up to date.

If you still are an active participant of WikiProject Physics, please add yourself to the current list of WikiProject Physics participants. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 14:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Hi Gulmammad. Many thanks for the award. I do appreciate that. --Kober^Talk 05:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. You are very welcome. I gave you the award after getting trough your edit history with a fine toothed comb :)
Gülməmməd ^Talk 20:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Also thanks for this one [2].Ateshi-Baghavan 03:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

You are welcome! Gülməmməd ^Talk 03:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Cherry

76.105.209.27 is responsible for the vandalism of cherry. All I did was make the first instance of seed into a link. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.177.118.24 (talk) 07:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Unappreciated

I don't appreciate my work being called "just useless something". But I do appreciate the notification. VartanM (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Response

I'm confused; why can only admins use talk pages, and what are you talking about 3RR? When did I violate 3RR? --Golbez (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Again I am saying, I don't wan't to argue but you can see from edit history of NK in June 1, 2008 and our edit summaries. There we weren't edit warring but were trying to neutralise a fact that was pushed by an anon (not me!). Taking that into account you could have unblocked me becaue according to Poco's revert counting, you violated the rule as well -- you edited 4 times in 3 hours +one after I was blocked. Gülməmməd ^Talk 18:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

And I was trying to work with you on that, and I didn't report you for 3RR, I was just thinking it could be done outside of the talk page. It was my error. --Golbez (talk) 18:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

It was perfectly done outside of the talk page, wasn't it? Here is the difference between our point of views. If there hadn't been any difference between our point of views, then why would I have been blocked? I don't know if there is a rule saying 3RR is not for admins and they can revert as many times as they like. Gülməmməd ^Talk 02:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

There isn't, and I have been blocked for 3RR in the past, and submitted myself for 3RR blocking when I knowingly committed it. Perhaps they realized that I wasn't doing straight reverts. --Golbez (talk) 02:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Reminder of editing restrictions

Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2, any editor who edits articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility may be placed under several editing restrictions, by notice on that editor's talk page. This notice is to remind you that you are listed as one of the users placed under supervision. I would like to remind you that are you are placed under the following restricitons:

1. Revert limitation (formerly known as revert parole). You are limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism, and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page.
2. Supervised editing (formerly known as probation). You may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should you fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in your interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise.
3. Civility supervision (formerly known as civility parole). If you make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then you may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat offenses.

You made two reverts in 24 hours here and here at Nagorno-Karabakh. I am going to let it slide this time, but from now on please follow the terms of your editing restrictions. Enforcement: Violations of limitations, supervision, or bans imposed by the remedies in this case may be enforced by brief blocks of up to a week in the event of repeat violations. After 5 blocks the maximum block period shall increase to one year.

Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here. Khoikhoi 19:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Khoikhoi and welcome to supervising the situation. One thing I didn't know, have I had this revert restriction (per week one) since I was placed in this list or have you just imposed? If you haven't just imposed then I hasn't been informed clearly about that, and of course, I didn't follow it since I dint know. And I want to let you know that I am here to help improve the encyclopedia as you or anyone else. I will ask you to have a close look at my edits and who is following me and articles that I created and have been working on. The other side that you just left a message forces me to be involved in edit warring. His contributions to the encyclopedia is only having people violate rules and report them or nominate articles that he doesn't like for AfDs. To believe this, it is enough to look at his and my edit history. Regarding restriction for articles related to the above countries, I was planning to create articles about villages in Azerbaijan and help improve Zanjan related articles as I found they needed help. But unfortunately I have been kept very busy by Poco here and here. I want to bring to your attention that I have done all edits to disputed topics in good faith(whenever I read them just as an ordinary user and found something incorrect then I edited) but others reverted me without sufficient explanation and so pushed me into edit warring.
The following has been my interest in wikipedia (no disputed topic!)(it is not my whole work in wikipedia):

Some of articles that I have created and improved

1. Seifallah Randjbar-Daemi
2. Sokolov-Ternov effect
3. Hamilton's principal function
4. A. P. Balachandran
5. Mark Trodden
6. Stanislav Mikheyev
7. Alexei Smirnov
8. Shamil Asgarov
9. Sheylanli
10. Sheylanli tribe
11. Boyat
12. Ashaghy Aylis
13. Khudafarin Bridges
14. Azerbaijan Time
15. International Centre for Theoretical Physics; significant contributions

Now if we go to see the interest of this user, what we see are only disputed topics! -User:Pocopocopocopoco/sandbox/Nagorno-Karabakh/, Nagorno Karabakh, Nagorno-Karabakh War, Nagorno Karabakh Republic, History of Nagorno-Karabakh, Economy of Nagorno-Karabakh and many many other disputed topics and reports and AfDs!
Finally, if you guys give value to my contributions by accusing me, then just ban me -- that will save me from, may be, wasting my time here. Gülməmməd ^Talk 22:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, apparently you were told here and then placed on the list along with Pocopocopocopoco, but as I've discussed with Seraphimblade, I don't think the warning was sufficient enough, so that's why I've given you an official explanation. Apparently you and Poco have been under revert limitation since June 1st, but both of you were apparently unaware of it. I appreciate that you are here to contribute to article content, and am impressed by all the articles you have written. As for Poco forcing you to become involved in edit warring, this is a choice that is up to both of you. Both of you had the choice to follow WP:1RR if you wanted, but instead things out of hand which is why both of you are on editing restrictions. If you believe he is stalking you, that can be addressed as a separate issue. But edit warring is never the solution. I have looked at both of your edits, and it is within Poco's right to nominate an article for deletion if he believes it violates certain Wikipedia policies. However, no one can "force" you into edit warring if you chose not to. The best way to solve a conflict is always through the dispute resolution process. As for Poco's contributions, he can edit controversial articles if he wants to. But keep in mind that he is now also on revert parole. Khoikhoi 00:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much Khoikhoi for your encouraging comment and clear explanation. If I edit in the future, I will follow these rules that I just learned. Gülməmməd ^Talk 01:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

image of Cornell

Nice image of Cornell's campus! However, just so you're aware, Cornell's East Hill campus is not in the Mohawk Valley... that valley is a large, multi-community region east of Syracuse, New York, and not in Tompkins County. cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 02:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Side comment: where'd you take that image from? Tompkins County Hospital? cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 02:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, while celebrating the independence day in outdoor, found that would be good skyline image for Cornell. The image (6x optical zoom) is taken from, let us call it West Hill (not East Hill), and over the city of Ithaca. So the city of Ithaca is between the place that the image is taken and the Cornell University. And about Mohawk Valley you are right :). Cheers, Gülməmməd ^Talk 04:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Sheylanli and Sheylanli tribe

Hmm. If all other methods of dispute resolution have failed, you might try filing a request for mediation. I'm not sure if I can be the mediator but there are many 3rd party users there who would be willing to resolve the conflict. Khoikhoi 00:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Let me see if whether or not he still insists on tagging articles. Hopefully from his last comment seems he is not going to tag them anymore after what he called blog and forum sources have been removed. Gülməmməd ^Talk 02:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

nobel icons

hello, the nobel icons are explicitly forbidden per {{infobox scientist}}. cheers! --emerson7 12:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello as well but I couldn't see anything in {{infobox scientist}} which forbids or allows the nobel icons. Gülməmməd ^Talk 20:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

yes i suppose that is somewhat of a vague reference...try this: parameter=name. --emerson7 00:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

What the heck are you talking about?

You said "for the removal of the tags see talk" in the edit summary. I added a tag and then I removed it myself. Are you angry that I removed my own tag? Do you want me to add it back in? You then added back in unsourced images because I removed my own tag? Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 03:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, you are right, I am not as quick as you are in tagging. Honestly, it took me a while to find out those tags in the articles as they contain a lot of mess references! If I were you, I wouldn't give myself that much trouble to tag them. I replied in the talk so you can see there. And if you'd like to get rid of some stress (as usual in the morning), then feel free to remove the images or you can put a lot of tags on them until I will want to get rid of some stress as well... :) Gülməmməd ^Talk 04:04, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Aghbulag

Hi Gulmammad. I just wanted to inform you that the two reverts you made at Aghbulag today do not qualify as vandalism, and you are still subject to your revert parole in cases such as those. An example of vandalism is adding "as;lkdfjas" to an article, not adding POV. Please treat this as a content dispute next time, as that's what it really was. If you have any further questions please feel free to ask me. Khoikhoi 03:59, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Khoikhoi, thanks for informing me. It was difficult to identify what was it, to me it was between vandalism (as content was removed or completely modified 1, 2) and a content dispute but more close to vandalism. So the warning also wasn't strict. May you advice what to do in exactly that situation. Gülməmməd ^Talk 04:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Neftyanik '66 Navbox

As a FYI, you may have an opinion on the proposed deletion of 1966 Neftchi Baku template, if so, please post to Deletion of Neftchi Template.--Friejose (talk) 14:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Help

{{help|Can anyone tell me where to report when someone stalks me. Thank you. Gülməmməd Talk 00:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)}}

• Try WP:AN to alert an admin. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 00:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you very much. I tried and hope someone will stop this. Gülməmməd ^Talk 00:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
    • If situations get worse, you know where to find me. Tiptoety ^talk 16:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
      • Hi. The situation is already worst. I have brought the problem here but still no-one cares about it. The user even continues such behaviour in WP:AN, he calls my comment to be "rude and unwelcoming comment". The same behaviour is being observed here also. I don't know what is going on within community members. No one wants to help me to end this problem. Thank you. Gülməmməd ^Talk 20:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Stalkin

I've spoken with him and warned him not to do that. Although he claims the page was on his watchlist, his comment was unnecessary IMO. As for the recently-added material, two pages where it could possibly be merged into are Ethnic minorities in Azerbaijan#Kurds or maybe Kurdistan Uyezd (Курдистанский уезд). Khoikhoi 04:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I cannot do that as there are "many" around counting my actions to report! But I'd ask you to do that as no one is editing that article except pushing POV if the article misses it!

Regarding the article Sheylanli tribe itself, I believe it is notable and should stay away from all kinds of POV. It is about a tribe branches of which existed or exist in Iran and Turkey. In Turkey most probably they are called Ceylanli but this needs references to be confirmed. In its AfD discussion Kober provided (many thanks for that!) a couple of Russian sources which talk about the tribe and also Phil Bridger gave one of the following sources:

1. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Lyon, H. Georg (1897, p. 173), Sandjak de Bayazid (Turkey), Alachguerd district, Seilanli, number of tents or houses 1150, population 5750 (as off 1883).
2. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Lyon, H. Georg (1897, p. 174), Sandjak de Monch (Turkey), Plaine de Monch, Seylanli, number of tents or houses 120, population 600 (as off 1883).
3. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Lyon, H. Georg, Libraire (1895, p. 195), mentions tribe as Seylanli in Urmi.

That is why I think the article should stay independent and we need to extend it to cover all branches of the tribe. I'd ask you to help to make that article encyclopedic article not only Gulmammad's article :) Gülməmməd ^Talk 04:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Silav

Hi,

I read your article on Shamil Asgarov. It's great that you are around with your great contributions. Keep up the good work.

Her bijî heval, Heja Helweda (talk) 02:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too!

Thanks for the Barnstar Gul! Look forward to working on more Azerbaijani articles with you. --Friejose (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Zanjan

Dear Gulmammad. Thanks for you contibution on Zanjan province. I hope you don't get offended by the tag I added. Hopefully you understand that my only concern is to improve the article. You mentioned that you have some references. could you cite your information there.--Larno Man (talk) 06:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

see this --Mardetanha ^talk 03:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

hi, you did great job - thanks!
p.s. I will be back after some time - may be a few months. Gülməmməd ^Talk 05:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

WP:RUSSIA roll call and your input required

Privet. You are receiving this message as you were listed on the membership list of WP:RUSSIA at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members. Recent times has seen minimal activity within WikiProject Russia, and there is an attempt to re-invigorate the project and have it become more organised into a fully-fledge functioning project, with the aim of increasing the quality of Russia-related articles across English wikipedia.

As we don't know which listed members are active within the project and Russia-related article, all listed members are receiving this message, and are requested to re-affirm their active status on Russia-related article by re-adding their username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members by adding:

# {{User|YOURUSERNAME}}

to the membership list. You may also like to place {{User Russian Project}} on your userpage, as this will also place you in Category:WikiProject Russia members.

There is also an active proposal on the creation of a single WP:RUSSIA project. The proposal can be viewed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia#Proposal_for_overhaul_and_creation_of_a_single_WP:RUSSIA_project, and your comments and suggestions are welcomed and encouraged at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal.

We all look forward to your continued support of WP:RUSSIA and any comments you may have on the proposal. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 04:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

List of Azerbaijanis

Dear Gulmmamd. You are trrying to standardize the categories of both Iranians and those of rep. Azerbaijan. I appreciate it. However there are two problems with it. I do not think that this is correct to include names of non-Azeris on the list of rep. Azerbaijan. What is striking here is when the names of Russians are included, there are no Armenians in the list. You either make a decision on ethnic or on territorial grounds. This article seems to tend towards the ethnic ground. It is good to make an article separate from this and call it the notable people from the republic of Azerbaijan and include in it also the non-Azeris

2- Second and the biggest problem is that it is very wrong to include people from Iran and Turkey in the list of the republic of Azerbaijan. Also poets such as Nasimi and Fuzuli did not come from what is today known as the republic of Azerbaijan.

These issues should be dealt with--Babakexorramdin (talk) 08:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Atashgah of Baku

Atashgah of Baku

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atashgah_of_Baku

You are needed here. Despite the abundance of Local Azeri Zoroastrian accounts, some Indians push still theire POV--Babakexorramdin (talk) 13:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)