User talk:Guest9999/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive - to leave me a message go to User talk:Guest9999.

AfD Nomination: .sport[edit]

All Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that .sport meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.sport. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you!!![edit]

I don't think founding a school event constitutes a claim of notability. The citations given were to things like articles in school papers (including her high school paper) and a YouTube video she put up, and did not appear to me to constitute substantial coverage. It looked like a typical resume-padding vanispamcruftisement from a complete s.p.a. (presumably the subject herself). --Orange Mike | Talk 17:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drake & Josh Christmas[edit]

Will do, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your speedy close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuela Testolini is being discussed at WP:ANI. it's felt that the closure was completely inappropriate. The afd was put on the article by an anon IP address, who then, as is proper in such cases, listed their reasons for nomination on the article's Talk page. The procedural listing on AfD should have explained that, but your unilateral close is hardly proper. Corvus cornixtalk 20:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, we all make mistakes.  :) Corvus cornixtalk 20:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the note! I'm totally fried from work craziness or I might have thought to ping you here before going to AN/I but I also figured someone should fix it up quick and you might not be on...sorry! and thanks! LegoTech·(t)·(c) 20:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter articles and Notability[edit]

Hey there!! I come to invite you to join a discussion still regarding HP articles and notability, as you were one of the most active editors when the big mergers took place (for example all the Hogwarts teachers or the Weasley family members). I came with this proposal to merge Neville and Luna into the Dumbledore's Army article because, like some other important characters we merged in the past (McGonagall, the Weasley twins, Lupin, Moody, Umbridge), these two have not met notability, or at least their articles are way too poor, especially if compared to other important (and indeed notable) characters like the trio, Snape or Voldemort. These pages remain as short, plot appearances only articles, with lots of in-universe and overdetailed scenes and dialogues.

I made This draft to give you an idea of how this article would look like with the changes. Cheers! --LøЯd ۞pεth 22:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image for speedy deletion[edit]

Hiya.. I'm wondering about this edit to the Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon article. Under what criteria is the image not fair use? I see a good explanation at the info page for the image. I know you notified the user, but the user has not contributed to WP since Aug 14, and I think s/he may actually be on an indef block. Prince of Canada t | c 22:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, notifying the original uploader is kind of pointless, for the reasons I outlined above. I'll see what I can do about adding proper rationale. Though honestly, FU stuff gives me hives; I have extremely strong views on copyright, but they do not extend to purely educational use, which WP is. I feel that any purely educational use--except, haha, things produced specifically for educational use such as training films--is fair use, but it's really not worth trying to change WP policy on that. Prince of Canada t | c 22:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hustadvika[edit]

Hi, I've added a source to Hustadvika. Can the general {{norefs}} be removed? Nsaa (talk) 19:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technology Integration for the Secondary English Classroom[edit]

So noted. However, this page does not belong on the Wikipedia project, as it was a bare sentence with no supporting context or verifying information on Google. I apologize for the mixup, and thank you for reassigning the correct CSD template. Yours, HubHikari (talk) 16:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, the reassignment has happened automagically with no interference from you. Interesting. --HubHikari (talk) 16:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right about this article being a hoax - I've started an AfD. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 21:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

is no german but frisian. please do not insult our people Last king of Frisia (talk) 09:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no worries mate. care to help me search for expierenced translators? Last king of Frisia (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback for a user[edit]

Hi Guest9999, sorry for a late response: I've been on a break for the last few weeks, and only logged in again today. As for the rollback rights of Miguel.mateo, as the edits you mentioned happened a few weeks ago now, I'll leave any warning for the moment. However, that user's recent reverts seem to be okay, but if anything resumes, I'll let them know. Thanks for the note. Acalamari 16:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Zebra standing alone crop.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Zebra standing alone crop.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

St. John's Lodge[edit]

Hi,

There have been a number of new sources added to the page St. John's Lodge, Portsmouth, New Hampshire since your delete vote:

  • History of Masonry in North America from 1730 to 1800 by Henry Whittemore
  • Albert G Mackey, Encyclopedia of Freemasonry
  • Freemasonry in the Thirteen Colonies

There's also an article from the Granite Monthly that's been there some time.

They seem to meet the non-trivial reliable secondary sources required. Do you have any more suggestions to improve this? JASpencer (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this. It's quite important to know that an outside party thinks that we are going the right way to establish notability. JASpencer (talk) 18:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy[edit]

For an article like Ricky Vazquez with no content, use {{db-empty}} rather than prod. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for brevity (word)! It definitely did not need AfD. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note on this, I've restored the article. Unfortunately, the talk page of this article hadn't been tagged with the template that gives notification of past AfD review. I've added that, so hopefully no one else will make the same mistake. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 13:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

GA Review[edit]

I have reviewed the Microsoft v. MikeRoweSoft article for Good Article status. Overall, good work!

Before it can be listed, I am asking for a second opinion from another reviewer on the use of the Microsoft logo. Specifically, I highly doubt that such a logo (which is trademarked) can be considered "public domain." Also, it is clearly a trademarked logo (note the (R) symbol), so that makes it require a fair use rationale. There are also some grammar issues that I have listed.

If those things get fixed, I don't see any problem listing it as a good article. --HoboJones (talk) 04:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review note--HoboJones (talk) 02:41, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The new image is a winner. Perfect! I'll take another look at the article for grammar and sources tomorrow. --HoboJones (talk) 04:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know if you want help in getting the article to FA status, which I think requires only some Manual of Style work and some copy editing. --HoboJones (talk) 05:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ICanFeelYou.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ICanFeelYou.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Identified japan.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Identified japan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion[edit]

I noticed you declined the speedy tag I put on this image. I realise that generally I1 is only for images of the same file type, but considering this is an inferior version of a non-free image and it isn't being used in any articles, I thought it might be covered under the general heading of the criterion (redundancy). Sorry for any trouble and time wasted. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 12:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this is what CSD:I1 should say, but I have to go on what it does say. Feel free to open a discussion at WT:CSD if you wish. Thanks for dropping by. Stifle (talk) 12:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft vs MikeRoweSoft[edit]

Actually what happened with this page is that the original Mike Rowe article was about the student, and I moved the content of that article to Mike Rowe (student) and rewrote the original page about the TV host. The person who actually wrote the original article was User:Ciaran H. Congratulations to you though, you did lots of work. Charles 20:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Megadeth - Peace Sells... But Who's Buying-.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Megadeth - Peace Sells... But Who's Buying-.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:33eosjq.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:33eosjq.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Original Barnstar
For all your work at reducing non-free content images. The thanks you get for that is usually only bot messages :), so therefore this barnstar. Garion96 (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Brett conti[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Brett conti, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Brett conti seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Brett conti, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mediterranean Caper hb.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mediterranean Caper hb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Big-sur-cover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Big-sur-cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your WP:PROF edits[edit]

I have reverted your revision of the lead to WP:PROF. There is no consensus for the change you introduced. When the WP:PROF guideline was revised over the summer, there was an explicit discussion of the need for it to be independent from the other notability guidelines and there has been consensus achieved for that position. A revision of the guideline of the type you made requires the consensus to be expressed at the talk page of WP:PROF itself, not elsewhere. That is the standard Wikipedia practice regarding edits to any Wikipedia page. You are welcome to start a discussion on the matter at WT:PROF and see if there is a consensus there. Nsk92 (talk) 01:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PUT IT BACK NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![edit]

QUOTE As you may have noticed I have moved an article you recently created at Dad and Dave into your userspace - it can currently be found at User:Foolestroupe/Dad and Dave. This is because I think it met the following criteria for speedy deletion:

   * Criterion A3 - The article did not contain any content.[1]

UNQUOTE

PUT IT BACK RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!! I AM EDITING IT WITH THE REFERENCES RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OR I WILL - IT HAS A "CONS" IN FRONT OF IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

13:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)13:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)FoolesTroupe (talk)`

Image copyright problem with Image:Two Ogres.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Two Ogres.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Funhouse.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Funhouse.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Security Check Front Cover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Security Check Front Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When making controversial moves (as with other similar processes like RfDs), it is customary for the closing administrator not to include the support and oppose opinions of IP addresses and new accounts (although their views may be considered in the summing up). This is a long standing position see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Often there is no need to explicitly strike them out as I did in Big Ben, but I did it so that later there could be no bickering about accounts I did or did not consider when looking at the Talk:Big Ben#Requested move. In this case it probably makes no difference, but have a look at WP:LAME#Places and other things and Talk:Dokdo/Archive_10#Invalid_Votes to see an extreme example. --PBS (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Halo master chief 343 guilty spark screenshot.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Halo master chief 343 guilty spark screenshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion[edit]

stop deleting useful info off other peoples pages —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnsmith&co (talkcontribs) 14:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sjtu-logo-red.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sjtu-logo-red.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply about Afd[edit]

Hi, Guest9999. In reply to your question: No, not once during that Afd did I feel your comments were out-of-line - and certainly did not think of them as harassment. (I also hope my own commentary there didn't come across to you as if I was irritated by it. I wasn't.) Anabel Barnston was definitely borderline notable/non-notable. So your Afd nom was warranted. It is one of those many cases that falls on the edge of WP guidelines and policies, and which is best solved through discussion. And you and I discussed our differing interpretation of the policies in a reasonable way. In the end, you offered a good solution. I think the purpose of Afd was well-demonstrated there. And I felt your conduct was just right. Cheers. CactusWriter | needles 07:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mara-unifyingforcelostjp.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mara-unifyingforcelostjp.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Message[edit]

Hello, Guest9999. You have new messages at ITasteLikePaint's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Season3pan.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Season3pan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, spank my wide buttocks - the beer has arrived[edit]

Have an unyielding beer on me.

Let the amber nectar flow all day and night. Let it run down the mountains and through the caverns and across the rich lawns to swamp the streets. Let it rain beer. Let the heavens open and shine forth beer. Let it all be beer. Wonderful beer. And let it be as deep as the heart of a lion.


This is an acknowledgment of your participation in the RfA of: SilkTork *YES!. 19:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DSCN1488-ipcress-front masked 600x800.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DSCN1488-ipcress-front masked 600x800.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock issues[edit]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Qatar Airways Logo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Qatar Airways Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Unification the yoruba[edit]

A tag has been placed on Unification the yoruba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 15:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

I moved Editing User:Guest9999/Super Mario Kart/Sources to User:Guest9999/Super Mario Kart/Sources, where it seems to belong. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kodomo no JIkan logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kodomo no JIkan logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Rose Chapman[edit]

Noted. I already removed the author's "hangon" tag and tagged the article as unreferenced. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I've nominated the article for deletion with an AfD tag. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After viewing the IGN article again, I now notice the "Fun Facts" section to the right of the article, which mentions the number of copies sold and its ranking, my bad. --Silver Edge (talk) 22:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Super Mario Kart[edit]

Updated DYK query On 3 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Super Mario Kart, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 00:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

Since you were an active voice in the debates regarding notability in the WikiProject HP, then you may be interested in a proposal to merge Luna Lovegood into Dumbledore's Army. See Talk:Dumbledore's Army#Merge proposal. Greetings! --LøЯd ۞pεth 05:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:IMG 0002 NEW.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:IMG 0002 NEW.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Journeyintofear.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Journeyintofear.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Marrickvillehighschoollogo.gif)[edit]

You've uploaded File:Marrickvillehighschoollogo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Periodadjustment.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Periodadjustment.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Rick Hunter 1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rick Hunter 1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super Mario Kart[edit]

Enjoy. Ashnard Talk Contribs 22:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Guest9999 (talk) 22:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted you to know that I passed it as a GA. Good work. Tezkag72 22:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Up Poster.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Up Poster.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I used db-music, I guess that wasn't the right one. Thanks for the info, I'll try to remember.  :) AnyPerson (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I finally got around to looking at the histories of this page and the metalworking page and found that the info was never actually merged. Based on your note on the talk page it looks like I should be able to request its deletion then, correct? Wizard191 (talk) 00:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, well I'll put up a PROD this time. I don't expect anyone to contest because it hasn't been used in so long, and I expect few are watching the page. Thanks! Wizard191 (talk) 00:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:EddyGrantBornTuff.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:EddyGrantBornTuff.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual music[edit]

The Barnstar of Integrity
Thanks for the notice. Great to see that there are editors who understand the value of multiple perspectives. NJGW (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pic on Cloverfield[edit]

Hi

Sorry to have to ask, but I wondered why you replaced the image. The new image does not really show the monster, and is very low res.

thanks--Chaosdruid (talk) 20:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest I think it would be more appropriate to use the close-up pic on the Monster page, but perhaps not the main Cloverfield page, it is a bit of a spoiler if you haven't seen the film.
I defer to your point on NFC and thanks for the explanation --Chaosdruid (talk) 20:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. I was actually referring to WP:CSD#A5. - Mgm|(talk) 10:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ZacharyQuintoSpock.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:ZacharyQuintoSpock.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters (talk) 11:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

?[edit]

who the heck are u and how did u see the lake padden page so fast, like 2 min after i made it. if it sounds to travely, then u edit it. how do i put a reference in there? it never works CallMeAndrew (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFD hell[edit]

Thanks for your support and testimony to my reputation on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Case studies of Brown-Sequard syndrome. For some reason it is completely acceptable to make personal attacks against AFD nominators (this is the second time in a week this has happened!) and get away with it. JFW | T@lk 20:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bulgarian police Macedonia 1942.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bulgarian police Macedonia 1942.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kill Bill Vol 1 Black.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kill Bill Vol 1 Black.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

Dear Guest, slightly belated post holiday thanks for your support in my RFA which was successful, I really appreciate your detailed and generous support and will try to live up to it. The full nonpersonalised Oscar acceptance speech version of my Thankspam is here, its best appreciated by reading out loud in the style of Ms Winslet :-) WereSpielChequers 23:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification[edit]

POTD

Hi Guest9999,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Palais Garnier's grand salon, 12 February 2008.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 3, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-03-03. howcheng {chat} 23:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:1 Night In China.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:1 Night In China.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops=[edit]

Thanks. Yeah- my bad. Hey- quick catch too. It's nice to know folks like you are keeping a watchful eye on things. Regards -J JMesserly (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sir John Deed[edit]

The article 'Sir John Deed' was created at 18:09 on the 14th Aprlil 2009. In the three minutes it took for you to critisize the article I can't be expected to create a detailed article. Please give me and others time to build the article.

With compliments.

User:DAFMM.

G4[edit]

Really? Oh, OK. Didn't know that. The page was re-introduced multiple times, so I thought G4 was okay. Sorry. --Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 19:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks! I'll remember that. --Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 19:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewEnterprisebridge.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewEnterprisebridge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fasach Nua (talk) 22:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A deletion review discussion you may wish to contribute to.[edit]

Hi. I've listed two deleted articles at Wikipedia:Deletion_review, following the discussion on "lists of unusual things" which took place earlier in the year. As a contributor to that discussion, you might be interested in expressing an opinion on whether the two deleted articles should be restored. SP-KP (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Thevar Magan vcd.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Thevar Magan vcd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obama topic AfD query[edit]

I wanted to draw your attention to this in the hope that you could expand upon your rationale. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mergers[edit]

If you want to merge the article propose a merger on the talk pages and discuss it, but don't unilaterally merge an article when there was NO consensus to do so from editors discussing the appropriateness of a topic merger. I reverted. Propose the merger, make your arguments based on the topic if you want. --KP Botany (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. It can be frustrating, though, at en.wiki watching how huge topics and disciplines are merged into poor articles on a single aspect of the discipline. Actually, it's mind boggling that there isn't an article on solid state ionics, and, that when one appears the discussion is not about improving the article but about disappearing it. The whole thing is just weird. I will write the article when I get a moment. For now, it should be a place-holder that, in addition to every minor character who ever appeared in an American syndicated cartoon episode, major topics of research in the 21st century also have an editor or two who have at least heard of it.... --KP Botany (talk) 03:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:XENDSPE001cov-copy.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:XENDSPE001cov-copy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jake and Joey.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jake and Joey.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jake in dressing room.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jake in dressing room.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Elfen Lied has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 17:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again, Guest9999, I'm not going to userfy the template at this time, but if you want it at any point in the future, just ask me on my talkpage, and I'll do it for you then. =) ···「ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk to Dinoguy1000 17:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Production I.G has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bodysong.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bodysong.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Westerland.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Westerland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 19:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguous Info removed from NIP[edit]

If the information you removed doesn't belong on the Wiki, then where do you suggest it be included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.21.215.250 (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

Thanks for the info. To clarify, after a page is deleted somebody has to go back and nominate the redirects for speedy deletion or the closing administrator automatically does that? Thanks. Drawn Some (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC) Thanks! Drawn Some (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

erroneous revert[edit]

I can't figure out how your edit to swine flu got tagged as vandalism. I am still a wikinewb, so it's quite likely I did this by mistake. But that was not my intention. Please accept my sincerest apologies. Craig Hicks (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD: List of Characters from Total Drama Island[edit]

Hi Guest9999. I've got a question for you over at the RfD. -- Thinking of England (talk) 01:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Graham[edit]

Yes, thanks. My mistake.--Leagueofireland (talk) 21:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fsol - archived ep fronte cover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fsol - archived ep fronte cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Layton Series[edit]

Hi there. I see you keep changing the Professor Layton series, and I think we need to come to some sort of an agreement. I would like to keep the game listed chronologically because that is how most things are organized. I believe the Layton series is no different, and should remain in that order. AlexanderLD (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion of Burneside Clay Shooting Club[edit]

I've deleted it now - yes, I know I'm it's original creator, but still, it met the criteria. It was a pretty useless article anyway. Stwalkerstertalk ] 01:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your query[edit]

Oh, oops. No I have no connection with User:Hibernian. I was dumb not to check that there was no user of that name. I'll have to think of a new sig. Hibernian231 (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. This RFC is based on, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses which you participated in. If you already have commented at the RFC, my apologies for contacting you. Ikip (talk) 00:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your posting - it's WP:Original research.

AfD nomination of Dechan Jueren[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dechan Jueren, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dechan Jueren. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]