User talk:Greenslade32

License tagging for Image:1226209678 l.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:1226209678 l.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Easy Come Easy Go - The album cover.PNG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Easy Come Easy Go - The album cover.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Denny album covers[edit]

Thanks for doing this but I have no idea why you didn't just upload the newer images with the same names as the originals, to avoid having duplicate images which will now need deletion as orphans. In any case, I fear you may have problems justifying use of such high-resolution images as againt fhr fair-use requirements. In particular, the FUR for File:Like An Old Fashioned Waltz LP.jpg needs fixing, and I'd do it myself, but I'm trying to get five articles written in time for a WP:DYK. Cheers. Rodhull andemu 21:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't finished yet, and I need to get back to you about usage of these covers in articles. Rodhull andemu 21:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Finished. Our policy on using copyrighted images prohibits their use except in certain limited circumstances; using them merely as illustrations, such as in Sandy Denny, isn't permitted. Even though the main image is copyrighted, it is considered valid use since Sandy is no longer alive- on that point, I'm still waiting for Dave Swarbrick to get back to us with a free image of his own, but I have no wish to badger him. However, using album covers is usually only allowed in articles about the album itself, and not in a discography. I've already spent a great deal of time on these articles, most of which I've written from scratch, and do not want to see them unnecessarily criticised, because I'm already very busy here. Some have already featured on the WP:Main Page as new articles containing "interesting facts". Please ask if you have any more questions. Rodhull andemu 22:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Sandy Denny. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Oneiros (talk) 17:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing[edit]

Please do not remove the headings "Side one", etc. from track listings; see here, particularly the sentence

Albums originally released primarily on vinyl or cassette should similarly list the tracks of each side separately under sub-headings named "Side one" and "Side two".

Thanks. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:25, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but they need to be removed as the musician info dosent make sense with them divided like that- also her other albums are not similarly divided- besides the albums are now available on cd and download without that divide. I work for Universal and Sandy Dennys estate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenslade32 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whether they are now available on CD/download or not is irrelevant. The style guide document which I have quoted should take precedence over personal opinion. The record was released more than ten years before CDs became commercially available, so the side headings should be present; their absence from other articles will be rectified once I, or others, dig out our vinyl copies (thanks for mentioning it).

You have also admitted that you are involved with the product, so it's only fair that I should pass on this standard message:

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sandy Denny Boxset cover sm.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sandy Denny Boxset cover sm.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Trevor Lucas 1985.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Trevor Lucas 1985.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Trevor Lucas 1985.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Trevor Lucas 1985.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marlene Dietrich in Just a Gigolo 1978.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marlene Dietrich in Just a Gigolo 1978.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ash Wednesday (1973 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]