User talk:GoldMiner24/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Your submission at Articles for creation: French Henry mine has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 16:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Rollback granted
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. -- TNT (talk • she/they) 05:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Baldy Mining District has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)My source is EWTN. Thanks. You could investigate by watching the vid on YouTube yourself, but of course you won't. God bless. But American Catholics will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.85.205.29 (talk) 04:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- That's fine if the information comes from a good source. I reverted your edits because you simply didn't cite a source as well as the edit seeming fairly non-neutral(see Wp:NPOV). If you would like to add the information phrased more neutrally and cite a reliable source, that would be great! GoldMiner24 Talk 04:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello GoldMiner24. Just noticed your revert on this page. Maybe this is a flaw in the tool you used to make the change, but the edit reverted, marked as "non-constructive", was anything but. The source clearly states 1985 as the year this A.V.A. was approved. The infobox entry of "1988" is what was clearly the mistake. Rolsenharbich (hmmm...) has not posted a note indicating the tool RW's mistake, so I am taking the liberty of doing so. --Alan W (talk) 05:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, seems you're right. GoldMiner24 Talk 05:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
In case you missed the ping
Message added 19:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
62.254.132.162 (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
You need to explain yourself how Roy Moore Award of $8.2 million for defamation and a story to it from NPR is not factual
You’re gonna have to explain yourself G Axxman (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if my revision was misinterpreted, I'm not saying you didn't use a reliable source. Please see Wikipedia's manual of style and make sure your edits follow the guidelines. Your edits seemed to me to be low quality with some spelling errors and it wasn't clear whether you were sticking to a Neutral Point of View GoldMiner24 Talk 16:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Birk Ruud
I saw you message about my removing information listed under personal life for Birk Ruud. I removed the information, as it was incorrect: he is not the son of former tennis player Christian Ruud. His fathers name was Øyvind, and he died a few years ago. Christian Ruud has 3 children: pro tennis player Casper and daughters Charlotte and Caroline. I apologize for not adequately commenting my edit. 80.203.24.100 (talk) 21:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thanks for helping improve Wikipedia! GoldMiner24 Talk 22:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
delete edit
May I know the reason for deleting an edit in an articleSanaa Al-Haib? Although my edit was to nominate the article for deletion as it did not meet the notability criteria. فاطمة الزهراء (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- I apologize, my edit was made in mistake. I undid my change immediately when I realized my mistake. GoldMiner24 Talk 21:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
If you could revisit the above discussion, everyone voting there seems to be saying you've made a good faith error. I'm here to ask you to withdraw your nomination. As a school, that article would be a Delete likely, but NRHP sites have virtually automatic notability due the depth of the application required to be listed. That document is a reliable secondary source, and detailed enough to completely show notability. I'd generally agree with the essay WP:RTS, this is one case where you can ignore it. Having worked on two different NRHP applications, I can tell you that if that document didn't rise to the level to show Wikinotability, the site wouldn't be on the registry. 174.212.228.160 (talk) 04:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, I saw the discussion (realized I was wrong) and didn't realize I could withdraw it. I'll get right on that. GoldMiner24 Talk 04:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's been my experience that AfC can be a really enjoyable activity on Wikipedia and it's one of the best ways to learn how the back-of-the-house works. But dayum there's a whole Lotta details. If you just post a !vote to the discussion to withdraw the nomination, someone else can close it, or, if you want to search out how, this is one occasion where it's OK for a participant to close a deletion discussion. I think I've got a link to the instructions on another phone and if I can find it, I'll add it to this discussion. Us lowly IPs aren't allowed to do such things, lol. 174.212.228.160 (talk) 05:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Closing discussions 174.212.228.160 (talk) 05:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Chuck Fennonbock
He was the 2nd. I’m his great granddaughter and I think thats the most reliable source Ejw.0610 (talk) 00:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- A verifiable source needs to be cited. I cannot verify that a user on Wikipedia has any authority to speak on the subject. Thanks for your effort towards improving Wikipedia! GoldMiner24 Talk 00:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Shannon Teresi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Shannon Teresi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Associating all this new found bullshit to vagal nerve tone
Is complete and utter medical quackery. We don't even fully understand what this vagus nerve theory is yet. Until we know what is going on it's about as much quackery as chiropractics. 101.189.205.186 (talk) 04:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- Please use sources and use language with a neutral point of view. GoldMiner24 Talk 04:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Anthony Hitchens
That is very accurate I’m with him right now he’s the one that told me about his Wikipedia.. You want me to Ft you go show proof Geesh smh.. Onlyegypt5 (talk) 02:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Cricketer infoboxes
Hello. I just noticed you added an infobox to George Downton. Thanks for doing that. As a heads up, using the Visual Editor to add anything to an infobox is a bit of a nightmare as it creates the code in a way that makes it very difficult for other editors to then edit when using the standard editor. I know it's a pain, but it would be really useful if you'd consider switching to the normal editor when you plan on working on infoboxes. It will make other people's job much easier. Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I usually switch back and forth between the visual and source editor. I just looked back at my edit and it looks horrible! I'm not sure why it's different but most of the time I add Infobox person and in the visual editor, this shows up fine and readable. I'll be on the lookout in the future. GoldMiner24 Talk 20:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Perhaps it's just the cricket infobox - that would be interesting to take a look at and see if there's a difference. I'd never used the visual editor until yesterday when I checked it out after seeing several (not just you!!) ib's that had the same issue. I'll take a look if I remember and see if there is something about the cricketer ib that would do this. Blue Square Thing (talk) 07:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've been going around and finding pages that don't have infoboxes and adding them. I usually use the standard editor but for infoboxes it makes it really easy so I don't have to remember all the parameters. I checked the first couple of pages I added IBs to, to make sure that the infobox person came out right when the visual editor wrote the code. If you take a look at some of my other edits to biography pages, you'll see they look fine(I just went back to check because your message made me worried that I did them all wrong) and I did them all in the visual editor. I don't know why the cricketer box worked differently and I don't know enough about wiki markup to really look into it. If you find out, I'd be interested to hear about it. GoldMiner24 Talk 07:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Perhaps it's just the cricket infobox - that would be interesting to take a look at and see if there's a difference. I'd never used the visual editor until yesterday when I checked it out after seeing several (not just you!!) ib's that had the same issue. I'll take a look if I remember and see if there is something about the cricketer ib that would do this. Blue Square Thing (talk) 07:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Interesting problem - I'll experiment and see what's occurring! I suspect there's a setting somewhere which means it doesn't behave properly. Fwiw I keep a more or less empty cricketer infobox in my Sandbox that I just copy and paste whenever I need a blank one. This is totally because I've never used the visual editor until I tried it out after seeing your edits!! It's here if you need it - or want to copy it into your own sandbox. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting
|
Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Continental Tie and Lumber Company
Hello, GoldMiner24. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Continental Tie and Lumber Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Shannon Teresi
Hello, GoldMiner24. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shannon Teresi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Maryanne Demasi
Hello GoldMiner24, Yes, indeed I made the change from "promotes" to "presented evidence demonstrating the efficacy of". I feel this is a truer and more accurate description of the subject's activities. In actual fact, there is no source or referencing that would suggest that "promotes" is more accurate, as Demasi does not get paid in any way to present her viewpoints on low card diets. The use of the word "promotes" would suggest that she does get paid. I feel that my change should be allowed to stand. 49.184.168.235 (talk) 04:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for reverting, I believe that you are correct. GoldMiner24 Talk 04:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thats OK, I just like for things to be as accurate and neutral as possible. There is also a lot of 'background situation' to this subject and her work that can't be written in the article as there are no verifiable sources or references that can be made, but basically she has been unfairly attacked and smeared. i'm only trying to give some balance. I'll make the change and thanks for understanding. 49.184.168.235 (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Shannon Teresi
Hello, GoldMiner24. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shannon Teresi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
WP:UAA
Thanks for this report. I've blocked the IP. Please be aware that vandalism reports go to WP:AIV. WP:UAA is for reports of inappropriate usernames per the username policy. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Whoops sorry, I know that, I must've clicked on the wrong link without thinking. Thanks for you help. GoldMiner24 Talk 18:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- No worries :) --Hammersoft (talk) 18:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Philmont camps
Next time you're online, please take a look at this discussion: Talk:Philmont_Scout_Ranch#Major_changes_made. Thanks. --evrik (talk) 17:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 08/08/2023
|
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 8, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in articles, history, geography, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We may try to organize one or more Wiknics. Guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
US Mountain West online meeting November 14
|
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi GoldMiner24. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
- Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
- Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)