User talk:Gnangbade

April 2014[edit]

== Requested move ==
{{subst:requested move|NewName|reason=Request move from "Kabye language" to Kabiye language" for the following reasons: 1. All the researchers who have published in English have used this spelling (Essizewa, Roberts, Pèrè, Padayodi) 2. this spelling is closer to the French spelling (Kabiyè) and the Kabiye spelling (Kabɩyɛ). 3. The word has three syllables, not two.}}

Hi I posted this request in April 2014 and there has beeen no action on it since then. Can someone please tell me whether I've made the request in the correct way? New here and still learning how to do this stuff.

January 2017: Errr, obviously not...

I would start at Wikipedia: Teahouse if you have been waiting that long for a response.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively check out WP:RM#Requesting_a_single_page_move, it clearly states edit at the bottom of the talk page of the article you want moved. The wanted talk page is Talk:Kabye_language, and "NewName" should be "Kabiye language" without the double quotes. That yields…

{{subst:requested move|Kabiye language|reason=Request move from "Kabye language" to Kabiye language" for the following reasons: 1. All the researchers who have published in English have used this spelling (Essizewa, Roberts, Pèrè, Padayodi) 2. this spelling is closer to the French spelling (Kabiyè) and the Kabiye spelling (Kabɩyɛ). 3. The word has three syllables, not two.}}

…including the curly braces, but not the funny monospace box surrounding the example on WP:RM.

You could also (better!) suggest a technical move in the WP:RM#Uncontroversial_technical_requests section with…

{{subst:RMassist|Kabye language|Kabiye language|reason=your reasons stated above}}

Have fun. –193.96.224.10 (talk) 19:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

message removed due to being misdirected[edit]

My error[edit]

Looking at the History page, I mistook your edit on Alternative Facts for another edit, posted a nasty message, and realized my error. I thought I blanked my message, and it appears that I must have selected way too much text for deletion. It was completely unintentional, very sloppy, and I'm sorry you had to replace what I erased.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quisqualis No problem, stuff happens Gnangbade (talk) 08:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kotto River

added a link pointing to Bria

Soborom Hot Springs

added a link pointing to Boubou

Tanougou Falls

added a link pointing to Atakora

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour[edit]

J'ai entendu parler de vous le week-end dernier lors de la Wikimedia Conference 2017 par Oliver Stegen. Je ne suis pas trop certaine de par "quel bout" commencer... mais je suis intéressée par votre activité au Togo. J'ai initié et anime régulièrement des projets en rapport avec l'Afrique (tel que c:commons:Wiki Loves Africa ou m:Wiki Loves Women ou m:wikifundi et... me demandait s'il vous intéresserait d'en savoir plus, voire de participer à ces projets. Par ailleurs, est-ce-qu'il y a des points sur lesquels vous auriez besoin d'aide ? Je ne suis pas certaine de pouvoir aider mais si je peux... ce sera avec plaisir. J'ai cru comprendre qu'il y avait un problème de sortie d'incubateur ? Sinon... quels sont les projets qui vous intéressent actuellement ? j'aimerais en savoir plus ;) Anthere (talk)

Bonjour Anthere Effectivement, Oliver Stegen m'a signalé votre intérêt. Oui, tout à fait, je m'intéresse vivement à vos projets sur l'Afrique et aimerait en savoir davantage. Je participe déjà à la réduction de la liste des thèmes africains qui sont absents du Wikipédia anglais. Pour ce qui est du Wikipédia kabiyè, je pense qu'on est finalement sur le point de sortir du gouffre après une (trop !) longue attente. Nous venons de traduire encore 130 des messages les plus fréquents, et on vient de m'informer que le Wikipédia kabiyè sera exporté le 25 mai - presque trois ans jour pour jour depuis le début du projet ! Dès lors, une question s'impose : pour le moment la participation extérieure au Wikipédia kabiyè est minime. Les très peu d'utilisateurs hors notre équipe qui ont essayé d'y mettre la main n'ont même pas une notion de ce que c'est une encyclopédie et font un peu du n'importe quoi. L'une de nos priorités, donc, est de pouvoir organiser deux Editathons, un à Lomé (la capitale du Togo) et l'autre à Kara (chef lieu du peuple kabiyè au nord du Togo) en 2018 ou 2019 pour susciter l'intérêt et former des éventuels utilisateurs. Est-ce que c'est le genre de chose que vous pouvez nous aider à faire ? On se sent néophytes : nous n'avons aucune idée comment ça fonctionne et surtout aucun financement. Mais le réseau professionnel y est pour savoir qui inviter à un tel évènement, ainsi qu'une forte dose de bonne volonté. Merci d'avoir pris l'initiative de nous contacter. A bientôt de vous relire Gnangbade (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci d'avoir répondu ! Et contente de voir que les choses avancent. Normalement, l'argent nécessaire pour organiser deux édit-a-thons n'est pas très important et peut être récupéré dans le cadre des Rapid Grants. Je ne vois aucun souci à vous aider à faire la demande. Donnez moi une estimation très rapide du montant qui vous semble nécessaire. Peut-être une estimation rapide des différentes lignes budgétaires (typiquement, c'est location de la salle, boissons et snack, goodies; éventuellement accès internet et petits frais de déplacements etc.). Anthere (talk)

Merci pour la réponse rapide. C'est une bonne nouvelle de savoir que les Rapid Grants peuvent nous aider. Je peux préparer un budget, mais j'ai voudrais avoir quelques précisions d'abord. Un édit-a-thon dure normalement combien de jours ? Qui va l'animer / encadrer ? Est-ce qu'un 'expert' vient de l'étranger ou c'est à nous de nous débrouiller ? Quel est le contenu du programme ? Combien d'invités faut-il prévoir (j'ai pensé à une trentaine). Est-ce que chacun est censé venir avec son ordi ? Quelle précautions faut-il prendre dans un milieu où la connexion internet n'est pas toujours très fiable et où il y a souvent des délestages ? Y a-t-il une liste de préparatifs déjà rédigée pour nous guider ? Gnangbade (talk) 08:00, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

D'ailleurs quelle est la différence entre un edit-a-thon et un Wikimarathon? Gnangbade (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Hello, I just classified your article Adiza Sanoussi, and have noticed that you appear to have a formatting issue with references. When citing the web, be sure to use the proper reference format^[1] Don't just paste the URLs into the page, as it makes the article look unprofessional. If you have any questions, just ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Happy editing. Firstclass306 (talk) 23:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice, but what do you means by "the proper reference format"? I don't understand the footnote you've provided. Gnangbade (talk) 07:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tanougou Falls[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Gnangbade, thanks for creating Tanougou Falls!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please help improve the referencing

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Hi Boleyn (talk) thanks for your message. Actually, I'm unlikely to do anything more on this article having got the ball rolling because I exhausted all the web references I could find. But I do have a question: the article contains three statements each of them supported by a reference, so why has it been assessed as needing more? Gnangbade (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gnangbade, I think you're right, I've removed the tag. The tag is actually 'refimprove' but its wording does indicate additional souces being eneded. I think for a moderately notable geographical feature in Africa, the sources are what they are. Blogs aren't usually accepted as WP:RELIABLESOURCES and the others, as promoting tourism in the area, are to an extent WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. However, it is notable per WP:GEOLAND and there's not much better to get via the Net, so no real gain to having a tag. Thanks for your response, Boleyn (talk) 18:12, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boleyn (talk) thanks! Gnangbade (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Gnangbade. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Gnangbade. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Massawa-Asmara Railway[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Massawa-Asmara Railway, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 08:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rhumel River moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Rhumel River, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 09:42, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks Celestina007 I'm doing that now Gnangbade (talk) 11:14, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhumel River has been accepted[edit]

Rhumel River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St Paul de Notsé Interdiocesan Major Seminary[edit]

The article St Paul de Notsé Interdiocesan Major Seminary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uziya Tzadok moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Uziya Tzadok, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Uziya Tzadok[edit]

Hello, Gnangbade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Uziya Tzadok, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uziya Tzadok (July 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uziya Tzadok and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uziya Tzadok, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 12:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gnangbade! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 12:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uziya Tzadok (July 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uziya Tzadok and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uziya Tzadok, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gnangbade! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Your edit to Ashley Jean-Baptiste has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ Can-be-used, In-place-of-author (9 April 1999). [www.google.com "Google"]. You can use this in addition to or in place of a publisher. Google. Retrieved 17 May 2017. {{cite web}}: |first1= has generic name (help); Check |url= value (help); More than one of |author= and |last1= specified (help)

[*****-1] Can-be-used, In-place-of-author (9 April 1999). [www.google.com "Google"]. You can use this in addition to or in place of a publisher. Google. Retrieved 17 May 2017. {{cite web}}: |first1= has generic name (help); Check |url= value (help); More than one of |author= and |last1= specified (help)

[1]