User talk:Ggrusin

This is Ggrusin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agladze Giga (January 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eejit43 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough inline citations to pass WP:BLP, also needs some cleanup and spelling/grammar fixes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agladze Giga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Eejit43 (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ggrusin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agladze Giga (March 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eejit43 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many primary sources, and sources that only slightly mention the subject. Just because the film is notable, does not mean this person is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agladze Giga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agladze Giga (July 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agladze Giga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Ggrusin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 21:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I declare to you with all formality that I am not interested in any finances for this article, I just want to create an article because this person has the right to be here, I do not receive any money, if I were financially interested, why would I add an article without experience on Wikipedia (and for almost three years)? I am not an organization, I am a person who wants to create a new article. thats all Ggrusin (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agladze Giga (November 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is not enough reliable independent, significant coverage listed below to support a stand alone biographical article. We need more than passing mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agladze Giga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry but where you see passing mentions now? there new article on variety where author talks about his every movies DETAILED (on last paragraph), check it carefuly, if so I can remove DOB and other words, if this should not be biograohy article what should it be? i can fix it

here is link

https://variety.com/2023/film/global/asia-argento-frances-barber-tamer-hassan-laura-whitmore-a-mother-for-an-hour-1235781648/ 188.129.254.226 (talk) 20:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry but where you see passing mentions now? there new article on variety where author talks about his every movies DETAILED (on last paragraph), check it carefuly, if so I can remove DOB and other words, if this should not be biograohy article what should it be? i can fix it

here is link

https://variety.com/2023/film/global/asia-argento-frances-barber-tamer-hassan-laura-whitmore-a-mother-for-an-hour-1235781648/

Ggrusin (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ggrusin, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ggrusin|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. This is regarding Giga Agladze, Agladze Giga, or however else you wish to spell his name. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I declare to you with all formality that I am not interested in any finances for this article, I just want to create an article because this person has the right to be here, I do not receive any money, I receive a lot of mail because of you from some companies who tell me that they will help with adding this article, you really insult me with these statements, if I were financially interested, why would I add an article without experience on Wikipedia (and for almost three years)? shouldn't you, as a administrator of Wikipedia know this? I am not an organization, I am a simple person who wants to create a new article Ggrusin (talk) 11:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, there's no need to get argumentative. I haven't accused you of anything or insulted you with anything. I have asked if you stand to gain financially, which was partly prompted by you coming to my talk page to remind me about this draft, and I then realised that you had neglected to respond to the COI query I posted here (section 'Managing a conflict of interest' above) nearly three months ago. Perhaps you could respond to it now? In other words, what sort of relationship do you have with this subject, if it isn't financial?

Secondly, if you receive mail from spammers and scammers regarding this draft, there isn't much I can do about that, except to advise you never to pay them any money, as they are likely to just take it and not deliver what they are promising. You are not receiving these approaches "because of [me]", but rather because you have created a draft which has been declined at AfC. If you see this page Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning it tells you more about this, and also provides an e-mail address where you can forward any such mail you receive, which may help Wikipedia fight this problem.

Thirdly, there is no such thing as "right to be here". Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and our policies and guidelines determine what can and cannot be published. It may be that one day this subject is deemed notable enough to warrant inclusion, but so far that hasn't been the case.

Finally, just for the record so there is no confusion about this: I am not an administrator here, and never have been. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not arguing with you, arguing here won’t lead to anything, I know it’s none of your business but it’s not fair when many people have an article on Wikipedia on which the neds of a site that Wikipedia would support, and by supporting I mean reliable sources, and I proposed an official website with frresh article that indicates what I indicate in the draft page, I accepted what you say and realized now that this article will not be available for a long time or perhaps at all on Wikipedia Ggrusin (talk) 17:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Agladze Giga[edit]

Hello, Ggrusin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Agladze Giga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Agladze Giga[edit]

Hello, Ggrusin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Agladze Giga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]