User talk:Gavin Sch

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Hello There!.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Sundayclose (talk) 22:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leave anything here!

June 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Additionally, please familiarize yourself with WP:MEDRS and Doc James' edits to the original changes. Your reversion was not justified and may be viewed as vandalism. Garzfoth (talk) 22:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please familiarize yourself with WP:BRD. If an edit has been reverted for good reason, especially on a policy page, rather than again reverting (as you did here), discuss on the talk page and get consensus. Continuing to revert is edit warring and can result in a block from editing. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 22:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly are you doing with all your reverts? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GenQuest. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Freerunning has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 20:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Freerunning shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 21:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please take the time to read the guidelines posted above, especially in regards to verifiability of added content. Your recent addition(s) and re-insertions of the same, un-cited, non-sourced, and OR content without a discussion as to why they were removed in the first place is becoming disruptive. Personal attacks in the form of your edit summary here on your last revert are also un-acceptable. There are rules here, and I would respectfully advise you to learn them before jumping in and adding Non-neutral point of view content into articles. I hope you can take this criticism in the spirit in which it is offered and not be offended. We need good, passionate editors here. I hope you stick around, but please do not edit war. That will only eventually get you blocked. Good luck. Regards, GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 21:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Oregon Route 212.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Did you really have to revert my edit instantaneously? That was uncalled for without checking the facts. CouvGeek (talk) 19:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Randykitty. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:GenQuest. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 20:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Unite4:humanity. (See diff). This is your final warning. Garzfoth (talk) 00:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]