User talk:Furahong

Hi, Furahong. I saw your article on ictal asystole. I'm a doctor myself. Your article could do with some more content. Welcome to wikipedia! - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello Furahong, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Richardcavell Good luck, and have fun. --Richard Cavell (talk) 06:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Furahong! I am TheFearow and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Matt/TheFearow (Talk) 06:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LDA[edit]

Hi Furahong,

Don't be got by one bad experience - although I can't tell what the actual content is (i'm not an admin), presumably bringing it up on WP:DR would be the best way - it usually helps to have a wide variety of contributions (your ictal asystole article was a good start, and I added a reference and some more information for you). I would say let it slip for now, and try in other areas.

Anything relating to lap dancing, and that general category of article will naturally undergo more scrutiny, just because it's a common target. Therefor some well-intentioned editors contributing to that area will naturally have troubles if they aren't well known. One of the downsides of a open-to-edit website.

I hope you decide to stay, as it's quite a fun place to participate. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or if i'm not on, there are many helpdesks available. Don't forget to check out WP:DR, it may be what you need. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) 06:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah your right and i should have probably not gone near that article request because just looking at it could be considered vandalism so i will stay away from the sexual type articles and try with some other varietys. So thank you for your help and i do hope to continue to contribute to the project thank you and happy holidays. --Furahong (talk) 06:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

could someone look at my contribs and try and clarify them a little better? thank you --Furahong (talk) 07:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions and trying to fill in some of our missing topics. I only read a couple but I suggest that you have a look at Wikipedia:Stub#Ideal stub article. It is critical that you give some context and understanding of what the topic is and why it is notable. Your article Cluster-weighted modeling makes no sense whatsoever. Emily Hood Westacott does not give any idea of who she is beyond being from Australia and playing tennis. I think that these are both candidates for speedy deletion unfortunately. Check out some of the associated WikiProjects and ask for specific advice and assistance there. Kind regards, DoubleBlue (talk) 07:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cluster-weighted modeling[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cluster-weighted modeling, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PamD (talk) 12:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you for your recent work on creating requested articles. It is much appreciated. Happy editing, Kingturtle (talk) 13:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tokyo City Nights[edit]

The article Tokyo City Nights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to satisfy the notability guidelines for software.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]