User talk:Fsecret

Image tagging for Image:Plastic and diapers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Plastic and diapers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Giga_omorashi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Giga_omorashi.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 11:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wet Set Magazine[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wet Set Magazine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MarkBolton 15:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fsecret please take a look at my further comments on the Talk:Wet Set Magazine

Notability of Omorashi Tenshi[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Omorashi Tenshi, by Sceptre (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Omorashi Tenshi seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Omorashi Tenshi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Omorashi Tenshi itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Omorashi Tenshi[edit]

I left another oppose on the deletion of article Omorashi Tenshi, it was tagged for speedy deletion using an incorrect tag and I also honestly believe that it shouldn't have been deleted for the reasons I have on the talk page (which I am copying below):

I also Oppose deletion on the basis that it does not actually break criteria for speedy deletion that was cited by Sceptre who left the deletion tag WP:CSD#A7, which states "Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content". This article is not about any person, any group, any company or nor is it about any web content, it is about manga published in print so this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. This article also serves a use for WikiProject Anime and manga, the article Omorashi and it also serves to demonstrate Japanese culture for WikiProject Japan (which Omorashi itself is a part of) -- JayKeaton 19:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can only conclude that the page was improperly tagged and deleted in violation of wikipedias own rules and guidelines. I SHOULD have removed the speedy deletion tag myself, but I thought I would post on the talk page first beforean admin deleted it, as the admin should have realized that the page was not correctly cited for deletion in the first place. JayKeaton 19:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete it under the reason nominated. I deleted under speedy criteria A1, as it had very little context. If the subject is of note/interest, then I'd advise actually writing a proper article, not a stub. It might be a good idea to draft it in user space before publishing in main space. The JPS ^{talk to me} 21:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It may very well have been a better candidate for a stub rather than a speedy deletion. I would rather not talk about this on another users talk page, if you would like to discuss if further could we continue any further posts on Talk:Omorashi Tenshi? JayKeaton 21:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise to Fsecret for using his(?) talk page for this: there is nothing to discuss. The "article" wasn't even a stub. It was one short line and a table. For all the time you've spent complaining about its deletion you could have written a proper stub! Remember to add links to reliable sources independent of the subject. The JPS ^{talk to me} 21:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fsecret, if you have anything that can improve or expand this page, I ask kindly that you add it to the page now. I don't know if you know how to read Japanese too or not, or if you have knowledge on the authors previous works, but anything you can add will be great. My eyes are sort of hurting after reading so many Japanese pages ;-;. Also, if you know how this title or how Omorashi manga fits in to the unique Japanese porn culture, it would be great if you could add that, and also how this title fits in with other Omorashi works. Thank you, and good night ^_^ JayKeaton 23:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Omorashi Tenshi.jpg[edit]

Hi there. I have updated the rationale of this image, but I do not know what the source is. If you could add the source to this image page and then remove the no source tag then the image will not be at risk of deletion. Simply adding a line of text saying what the source of the image is (where you got it from) will suffice. [here] is a high resolution scan of the same book cover that shows more details, which may be of some help determining the actual origin of the image as well as obtaining a suitable source for the wikipedia image page. If a source is not added soon, the image will probably be deleted. JayKeaton 22:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diaper[edit]

Hi, I appreciate the work you recently contributed to the diaper article. I am relatively new to Wikipedia, and am unsure of what constitutes a reliable source. I have been reverted in the past for innapproiate sources, and was wondering if you could tell me whether these are acceptable. If so, I may use them in the diapers/bedwetting articles.

Article written by a former bedwetter which comments on the perception that diapers are babyish, and asks whether anyone is ever too old for diapers.

Article written by the same former bedwetter, which looks at why diapers are considered embarrassing or undignified.

Basic look at bedwetting diapers.

Article written by a doctor which claims that diapers can prolong bedwetting.

discusses primary and secondary bedwetting

Article written by doctor which asks whether bedwetters should be diapered

Thank you for your time. If you're interested, I recently proposed that diapers merge with training pants, and would love to hear your opinion. Coop41 07:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pages being deleted[edit]

I am not sure that there are any policies to protect some of those manga pages, Omorashi Tenshi actually has an genuine ISBN so it seems to be a proper manga, but I'm not sure if Omorashi Sakura was published properly or just published underground. The author of that book has done some other apparently notable mangas, but I can't find out if THEY were properly published of of they were published underground as "doujinshi" or not. These Afds are pretty tough, with articles like these people would most certainly vote to delete and it looks like the deletion tag cannot be removed until the discussion is up. All I can do is suggest that you do a bit of research to discover if these are notable or not when you create the articles, a good area to look at would be to see if the author (the artist really) is notable himself outside of any doujinshi circles, or even better; if the artist has done any work on major published mangas that are not part of fetish theme. JayKeaton 11:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Omorashi Sakura.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Omorashi Sakura.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Omorashi_Riko-chan.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Omorashi_Riko-chan.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get out of here.[edit]

Wikipedia is not the proper place to indulge your fetish. Everyone here – anyone who is serious about compiling this monster encyclopaedia project, anyway – tries to be factual. You're welcome to your tastes, but they border on what might be considered unlawful even in some rather liberal countries.

I have removed the rubbish about "diaper discipline" from the Diaper article after 'Netsearches convinced me that it was from a fetish-oriented newsgroup, which apparently you must be invited to join. If any such thing as they describe were actually done, it would constitute child abuse, at least here in Canada, where I am.

Anyway, we try to compile facts, not fantasies.

Now leave.

Kelisi 02:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that this editor's personal attack is out of order and have told him so on his talk page. Coop41 03:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I've told Coop on his talk page that it's not a personal attack. It is an objection to the way this user uses WP.Kelisi 15:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reactions to Kelisil's post (Above) seem to be about two points. First, the post was harshly worded: "Now leave." Recommending specific changes to editing practices might have been more effective.

Second, comments about child abuse have caused a defensive response. This may be due to the first point and a misunderstanding. Coop41 has correctly pointed out that paraphilic infantilism and diaper fetishism do not involve actual children. However, Kelisil was probably referring to diaper discipline. As it was described in the diaper article, this parental practice does involve children. BitterGrey 14:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shizukuishi kyuun kyuun toilet paper.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shizukuishi kyuun kyuun toilet paper.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kanzen Mushusei: Sorezore no Houkago[edit]

A tag has been placed on Kanzen Mushusei: Sorezore no Houkago requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zginder^{(talk) (Contrib)} 22:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Iinari! Aibureshon 1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Iinari! Aibureshon 1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kanzen Mushusei: Sorezore no Houkago[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kanzen Mushusei: Sorezore no Houkago, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanzen Mushusei: Sorezore no Houkago. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Farix (Talk) 23:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Omorashi Ana Dorei.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Omorashi Ana Dorei.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kanzen Mushusei.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kanzen Mushusei.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Omorashi Tenshi.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Omorashi Tenshi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Plastic and diapers.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Plastic and diapers.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Neitherday (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Feminine anarchy.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Feminine anarchy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Nagisa 02.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Nagisa 02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:COVER 36.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:COVER 36.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maniax (OVA)[edit]

The article Maniax (OVA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-notable pornographic anime OVA. A search for reliable sources turned up nothing more than copyvio websites and self-published websites.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Farix (t | c) 17:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of anime and manga featuring omorashi for deletion[edit]

The article List of anime and manga featuring omorashi is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of anime and manga featuring omorashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wet Set for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wet Set is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wet Set until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gnu 57 16:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Old COVER 1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old COVER 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vixens for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vixens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vixens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Waxworker (talk) 22:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vixens omorashi.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vixens omorashi.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sandstein 21:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]