User talk:FrankDev/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
December 2012
- FrankDev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 0.0.0.0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mooseman385". The reason given for Mooseman385's block is: "Vandalism-only account".
- Blocking administrator: Mentifisto (talk • blocks)
Accept reason: I softened the Mooseman block so you should be able to edit now. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
About closing RFD's
My understanding is that when an RFD is closed because the redirect was turned into an article, the result is "Moot" not "Keep". Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 01:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you removed the PROD notice from this page wthout either giving an edit summary or a reason for doing so on the article talk page. Why? it is entirely non notable, unless there is a reason not given in the article. In future, please leave edit summaries and in cases like this a reason for your action.TheLongTone (talk) 13:30, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vilovataya (inflow sluggish), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:39, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Commons Rename
I am requesting a rename on Commons. My current Commons name is Weihang7. FrankDev (talk) 10:11, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- You've already been renamed, & your previous edits have the new name. How about using your talk page to reply to posts left: see above.TheLongTone (talk) 10:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- First, I am requesting a rename on Wikimedia Commons, not ENWP. Second, I acknowledge your advice, and I will do so in the future.--FrankDev (talk) 10:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
You have a new message!
Message added 13:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
California Seismic Safety Commission
Hi Frank. Sorry to say I am painfully new to contributing to WikipediA and my initial experiences are not going well. I received that dreaded speedy deletion notice because the text I used for the Seismic Safety Commission's WikipediA page was used by another site to also describe the California Seismic Safety Commission. The text is my original content from the website I designed and maintain. However, it's perfectly fine for it to be used on other sites too. We want the Commission to be described exactly this way. I contested the speedy deletion but since I am unsure how things work behind the scenes here at WikipediA, I decided to just edit the URL where the Commission is listed and go with an external link. It's a shame because I would like to have created a WikipediA page for the Commission. Any hints for me?
Thanks,
Jaime Marso Webmaster for the California Seismic Safety Commission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaime Marso (talk • contribs) 12:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I understand your desire to make a Wikipedia page for your Commission, however, as you are affiliated with the Commission, it might not be best for you to create and edit the article since you have a conflict of interest. If you own the copyright to the content, you can see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instruction on how to "donate" the material to Wikipedia, so that it can appear on Wikipedia and not be tagged with speedy deletion under copyright infringement. As with the deletion issue, if the contest to the speedy deletion is with a valid reason, the reviewing administrator will decline and not delete the article. Thank you and Happy New Year! --FrankDev (talk) 12:40, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 07:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
DYK for HD 179821
 | On 3 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article HD 179821, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that HD 179821, a bright star in the Aquila constellation, is a supernova candidate? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HD 179821. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Frank. Thanks for your work patrolling new pages. I'm just dropping you a note to let you know that I've declined the speedy deletion tag you placed on Numafung, because the A7 (no significance) deletion criterion is quite proscriptive, and doesn't apply to films (only to people, individual animals, companies/organisations and web content). I've listed the page for deletion using WP:PROD instead, since I agree with you that it doesn't belong here. Cheers, Yunshui 雲水 14:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
decision to not accept DITTO article
hi frankdev. my article was recently reviewed by you and did not pass submission due to not presenting a neutral point of view. do you have any recommendations on how i can improve the article to help gain submission. i've went ahead and removed all but the very basic portions. i'd love to have some feedback as i'd like this to be my first published article on wikipedia =). hope all is well and thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rysilla (talk • contribs) 02:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Your original version seemed like an advertisement,"You can...", only illustrates the good side of the website. Also, instead of "their", you should use "it" or "the company". I suggest that you read the Wikipedia guideline on neutral point of view. Additionally, at the end of your post on a talk page like this page, please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. --FrankDev (talk) 02:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
understand your suggestions. i'll try again and resubmit with your suggestions. thank you for your time
Rysilla (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
hi frankdev. how can i go about resubmitting. before there was a link but now that link is no longer there. sorry for the ignorance but this is my first time posting. anyhow, i've updated and would like to resubmit my page for consideration . i've removed a lot of the content that seemed to focus on advertising and made better use of neutral language per your suggestions.
Rysilla (talk) 02:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, Rysilla, I am unable to resubmit the page, however, I think the article in its current form will not be accepted because it is too short.
hi frankdev. ok, i will work on expanding it. having said that, how do i go about resubmitting? should i just start over using the article creation wizard?
Rysilla (talk) 03:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was not being clear, by "unable", I meant I do not have the technical ability to do so. --FrankDev (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
West Valley School District (Spokane)
Hello FrankDev,
Thank you for your concern about this article. Just letting you know that at present time the page is being improved. New information will be seen shortly.
Greetings!
Glebby (talk) 04:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Article for December 6, 2012
Hi Jim, I am responding to an email that we received regarding our article pertaining to our small home-based business called PetsGlobalSupply. I am wanting your feedback on why or article is being deleted and what can be done to correct it. Please respond as soon as possible. Thank you.
CAW — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.218.196.27 (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newfane middle school
Hello Frank, the deletion discussion which you created for Newfane middle school was incorrectly logged under January 2 rather then January 6. I have moved it to the 6 January, of course the mistake wasn't your fault it was Twinkle's but something you may want to keep an eye on in future, Regards ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I changed my computer's clock back to perform an experiment and it was not changed back.--FrankDev (talk) 02:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok well that explains what happen then. Happy editing ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Can you please help to get rid of the speedy delete process of the UNL Ontology article. I am still working on improving the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmanwar (talk • contribs) 04:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Instead of trying to remove the notice, you should improve the article, because admins will exert discretion on whether to delete pages based on the content of the page. --FrankDev (talk) 04:33, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Circumcision
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Circumcision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I want to become a good wikipedian like you, Please help me, you have nominated Gudha (Jhajjar) as non valuable but I have visited 100 times, Please retain it...Happy New Year — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legalaidclinicssdlc (talk • contribs) 05:04, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- I nominated it for deletion, but I did not say it was non-valuable. On Wikipedia, inhabited places are usually presumed notable if they have references to reliable sources, so I suggest that you find sources on the settlement and reference it in the article. Regards,FrankDev (talk) 05:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks FrankDev for guiding me, Please be my friend to help me good wikipedian, I have added some references to the Gudha (Jhajjar) and you may delete old messages, What is UTC used for timing or anything else. Help me in designing my user page. again thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legalaidclinicssdlc (talk • contribs) 06:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- The userpage was actually not designed by me -- it is a derivative work of User:Mediran's user page and User:Pratyya Ghosh's user page. I am not actually good at doing this at all -- so please don't ask me. Also, anyone may remove the deletion messages if they believe the page should not be deleted and when the deletion proposal is a PROD. --FrankDev (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: Request for review
Yes, I'd be happy too! I'll look at it right now and update the review page. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:49, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 14:27, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Todd Pedersen
Hello FrankDev.
Ja, Ich spreche Deutsch auch, und auch ein wenig Spanisch. But alas, while my friends are studying Chinese, that is not yet one of my languages.
Sorry if I left a comment you thought was not civil. I could say the same about your comments, as they are accusing me of 'promoting' or otherwise engaging in wrongful behavior. SO I will do as you suggest at the start of this page, and assume good intent on your part, and apologize again for suggesting possible jealousy.
Anyway, the article can be improved, I'm sure. I have added some more citations to other newspaper articles. I can remove all of the Vivint-created youtube videos if necessary, but I don't believe that would benefit the article. I believe it is relatively neutral in that it does not aggrandize his positive attributes beyond what they are. As I said, I don't know of his negative ones (everyone has them, right), though I have seen many negative ones about his company (all pertaining to overly aggressive marketing by his company, not to him individually). Those are dealt with in the Vivint article that's been around for quite a long while. Oldnoah (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Oldnoah
World Software Corporation Submitted Page Help
Hi FrankDev,
Thanks for your input on my submitted page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/World_Software_Corporation). I was wondering if you could help clarify how I can re-write the page to be more encyclopedic/neutral. I toned down all of the company's PR information to put just the facts on the Wikipedia page, and I think that shows, seeing as there are no 'peacock' terms, at least from my point of view. I'd really appreciate if you could point out which areas of the article I should revise to make it more neutral/encyclopedic. Thanks so much!
Russellmwolf (talk) 13:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)russellmwolf
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Béla Kontuly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Novecento (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Colonel Bagshot
I'm literally still editing it, why tag it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdasdlulzlulz (talk • contribs) 22:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia forbids copyright violations on any pages. Your copy-and-pasting of text without attribution(Naming the source) is a clear case of a copyright violation, and can and will be speedily deleted.FrankDev (talk) 22:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: The One Peoples Public Trust
Hello FrankDev, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of The One Peoples Public Trust, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. FrankDev (talk) 21:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Ragist Article
Hello,
Could you please review my messages submitted for the 'Ragist' article?
Regards,
Essences — Preceding unsigned comment added by Essences (talk • contribs) 14:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
ArchE17 Marked For Deletion
What sources are found to be non-compliant, and what do I have to do to make this article compliant?
Thanks Mickeeyone (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo of Landtag of Saxony-Anhalt.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Landtag of Saxony-Anhalt.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
Hi FrankDev/Archive 1. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FrankDev (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 04:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Welcome to STiki!
|
Hello, FrankDev, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 06:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC) |
|
hi
I am new and I would appreciate your help more than deleting my first article. This subject matter is rather extensive so I thought it would be better to start with the sources. ImthatIm (talk) 21:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi imthatim, welcome to Wikipedia! You would probably want to read Wikipedia:Your first article before you create your first article, and I strongly suggest that you use the Article for creation. Right now I could not get what you are talking about from the article. If you are in anyway related to the Trust, please read our conflict of interest policy.FrankDev (talk) 21:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, well that is going to be kind of difficult. I will let you decide. The article would then have a conflict of interest with every single human being on the planet. Do people in Britain get to edit the article there? I am just asking. From what i have been reading, this is the same legal trust that is now formed and owns all of the governments established. I am still trying to make sure that whatever is written in the article is based on the published facts. ImthatIm (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry I was not being clear, but "related" means promoting the subject would be of interest to you. But I could not understand the "From what I have been" sentence. The fact that you are trying to make sure that whatever is written in the article is based on the published facts is good. FrankDev (talk) 21:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- hi again! The article was deleted so I am writing it again from scratch, however, I believe it was deleted because of a conflict of interest. I will post it again and I would certainly appreciate it if you could check the facts for yourself. Please understand that this information is rather new, but nevertheless completely real, filed, and unrebutted by what most common people in the USA believe currently is their government, but which is actually a now foreclosed corporation. Therefore, please also know I myself am not any of the people mentioned in the article but I do live in the American Territories. Anyone, however, who is still a party to, or using any form of benefit from the company known as the "Federal Reserve Bank" would certainly have a conflict of interest for such facts to be known. Therefore, I ask your help again with the editing of the article and would like to make sure that people other people are not using their conflicting interests as motives for deletion. Thank you. ImthatIm (talk) 08:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am discussing about the change I made to the 'Brit' page. I acknowledge that you feel that the use of 'Brit' as hate speech in Ireland may not be notable. As I am new here, I would like to discuss with you the reason or reasons that you feel it is not notable? I am happy to come to whatever consensus decision, when we have discussed. Sometimes I will be right, and sometimes wrong, so I would like to discuss any disagreements, with other wikipedia users such as yourself. We can hopefully both understand each other's opinion. \Jonathan Ferguson 16/01/2013Celtic Seer (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- It is not that I feel the subject is not notable that I proposed it for deletion, but the Wikipedia notability guideline, which states "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list.". I appreciate your civility very much. Cheers, FrankDev (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Sri Siddhartha Education Society
Manjeshpv (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC) the article is written by me. that is my article i'm student of that institutions. that articles is my own writings. i given that article to post on the website
I marked it as reviewed because it's a speedy deletion candidate. --Makecat 03:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- SD template has been removed by another editor, I want to enlist the opinion of another reviewer. FrankDev (talk) 03:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello
Hello..just wanted to talk about the declining of the submission of the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Lu_Han
Actually only a part of the article exists in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exo_(band)
Since EXO is not a rookie band anymore..& they're a taking part in a lot of activities these days..it would be better if all the members have an individual page~ & also it'll be easier for the readers to know more about their idols..Also noticed that already few of the members have their individual pages^^ MinervaD (talk) 05:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor! | |
| Hello FrankDev. You have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much.--Pratyya (Hello!) 18:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Cloud computing
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cloud computing. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Advert tag
Message added 04:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
- Featured content: A lousy week
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 09:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers
- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:56, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on User talk:Tazerdadog/Tau (Proposed mathematical constant)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Tazerdadog/Tau (Proposed mathematical constant). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)