User talk:Franamax/Ucontribs-0.1

Article Ratings

The columns for ratings are derived by obtaining the category list for the article talk page and comparing as follows:

• Article Rating
  • Category starts with any of "Stub-class", "Stub-Class", "Stub class", "Stub Class" = Stub-class
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "Start" = Start-class
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "C" = C-class
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "B" = B-class
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "GA" = GA-class
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "A" = A-class
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "FA" = FA-class
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "List" = List-class
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "FL" = FL-class
  • Category is equal to Category:Wikipedia good articles = GA-class
  • Category is equal to Category:Wikipedia featured articles = FA-class
  • Category is equal to Category:Featured articles = FA-class
  • Category is equal to Category:Wikipedia featured lists = FL-class
  • The highest class encountered is stored, article class trumps list class
  • If multiple ratings are found (eg. Start vs. B-class), an "*" is added (not for lists)
• Importance Rating
  • Category starts with any of "Low-importance", "Low-Importance", "Low importance", "Low Importance" = Low
  • Category starts with same combinations, but with "Mid" = Mid
  • Category starts with same combinations but with "High" = High
  • Category starts with same combinations but with "Top" = Top
  • All the same again, using "Priority" instead of "Importance"
  • The highest importance encountered is stored, so a high-importance birds-of-Australia article that is also a low-importance animal article and a mid-importance bird article will be shown as High.
  • If multiple ratings are found (eg. Mid for one project, Low for another), an "*" is added
• Former Rating
  • Category starts with "Wikipedia former featured articles" = Former FA
  • Category starts with "Delisted good articles" = Former GA
  • The lowest former rating is selected, so an article demoted from both FA and GA will show as a Former GA.
  • An article can be in a rating and former of that rating if it was (say) a FA, was demoted, then was promoted again.
• Version
  • Category contains "Version 0.5" = 0.5
  • Category contains "Version 0.7" = 0.7
    • This seems to catch only articles in a "Held" category
  • Category contains "<xx>-Class Version 0.5" = 0.5-<xx>
  • Category contains "<xx>-Class Version 0.7" = 0.7-<xx>
  • Category contains "<xx>-Class Wikipedia 1.0" = 1.0-<xx>
    • NOTE: This may not properly spot Version 1.0 articles, due to the categorization system used at this time
  • In the version rules above, <xx> is any of "Stub","Start","C","B","GA","A","FA". The highest version is picked, and the highest rating within that version is picked.

• CD
  • Category contains "Wikipedia CD Selection" = tick-mark

All comments on this method of determining ratings are welcome! Franamax (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Updated 25Jun08 to match rules in Signpost article. Future runs should match these rules. Franamax (talk) 08:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Bugs

Please list any discrepancies here with maximum information, so I can resolve them.

• Casliber - Kererū - Unicode problem (fixed)
• RJHall - Dungeons & Dragons - &-amp; code s/b %26
• General error - special characters such as &, xx-dash, u-bar, ', etc. are not being retrieved for status analysis - will fix soonest.

All known bugs are fixed. All unknown bugs are unfixed :) Learn me of any new problems please! Franamax (talk) 11:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Nice

What a nice tool; can you run it on Cla68 (talk · contribs) and FeloniousMonk (talk · contribs)? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

I will need to re-run them when I fix the problem with getting status for non-alphanumeric titles. Franamax (talk) 17:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

I guess the script can't deal with the apostrophe at Battle of Edson's Ridge and Carlson's Patrol, which are featured articles ? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, I just killed the Unicode problem (which I actually fixed months ago, I just needed to look). Apostrophes, &'s, and dashes are coded with "&xxx;" - I'll soon slay that jabberwock too! Will repost the data on fix. Update the broken fields for now as you wish, I'll just overwrite with the new data after comparing it with my old version to verify the fix. Franamax (talk) 23:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Can I get a run on me? Guettarda (talk) 02:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Done. It certainly is humbling to run this tool. Considering the length of time it takes me to research, properly word, and reference a single sentence, to see these levels of contribution is impressive. Franamax (talk) 12:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

24Jun08 Version

• Should pick up "C-Class" and variants, looks like this class has been introduced.
• If "Unknown-importance/priority" variants are found, now show an importance conflict.
• Pick up version (0.5,0.7,1.0) and class, pick the highest version and article class, strict capitalization, no conflict checks - new column.
• Look for "Wikipedia CD" - new column.

Problem reports welcome! Franamax (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks terrific, the only blanks are readily explainable by the talk pages of the articles in question. Wonderful...oh, and there could be a column on whether the page had been transcluded to veropedia (just kidding) Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, the conflict tag is good, I went and corrected a few pages based on that, and having a 'failed' column is not a bad idea either, though not as immediately valuable to me. I'll see what other folks think. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Heads up... :) I'd love another run especially as Wannabe kate seems to have carked it at 45k for me...Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)