User talk:Ferrisayar

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ferrisayar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SamHolt6 (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

Hi. I recently nominated a draft you created (Draft:Fractional CMO) for speedy deletion as I feel it is overly-promotional towards the subject. Please see the notification on top of the draft for more information. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC) Why would you delete the draft. The content is supported with credible sources including the Wall Street Journal. You are absolutely out of line and biased. I DEMAND THAT YOU SHOW EXAMPLES OF OVERLY PROMOTIONAL. I did not promote anything nor did I mention a single brand or link to any 3rd party. Ferrisayar (talk) 23:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 22:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added actual and valuable FACTS then I provided a source. The function of the Chief Marketing Officer is now a revenue generating function as opposed to a lead generating one. May I respectfully ask Do you know any thing about CMOs? What qualifies you to question the value of the content I provided. I understand and appreciate that you are trying to keep Wikipedia truly informational, but I added valid and extremely relevant content. Thank you . Ferrisayar (talk) 01:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing my comments and not the comments that reference cmox.co that is not a valid source. Are you being bribed? Did someone pay you to help their business. the point I made about the change in the role of the CMO is the most valid comment about the role of the current role of the CMO. I read it on Deloitte's website and it is part of a study conducted with the CMO council . Explain to me how my reference is any different than the #3 reference from cmox.co

Also explain to me how what I said is not accurate. Do you have any knowledge of the role of the CMO? Validate your biased actions

// Ferrisayar (talk) 10:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making personal attacks. Actually, who cares, you're going to be perma-banned just as soon as possible, since your conduct has been disruptive for the entire time your account has existed. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 10:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chief marketing officer, you may be blocked from editing. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 10:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for unconstructive editing. Your persistent promotional editing and refusal to listen to other editors or take notice of the information they provided you with about Wikipedia's policies might perhaps have justified a short-term block to persuade you to take notice, but your childish personal attacks on an editor left little doubt that you have no intention of ever editing collaboratively.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 13:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]