User talk:Fenix down/Archive 17
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
Technical news
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
Administrator changes
CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Arbitration
Deletion of Ishan Pandita
Can you please tell me why the page Ishan Pandita has been deleted. I used proper reliable sources to make this article. But it has been detected. It's very disappointing to me. Debabrata Sarkar Mejbill (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- The AfD was clear in its consensus that the sources provided were insufficient to show GNG. Fenix down (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- To be honest, I never saw the AFD. But hang on - I thought the closer was supposed to be uninvolved - which means that someone else should close it. There was no clear consensus on the second AFD. I'm not sure why the third would be less so given the coverage since then. Nfitz (talk) 23:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't get a response on this User:Fenix down. Nfitz (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Are you going to respond? You were involved, and then you closed this. Please revert the close. Nfitz (talk) 22:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, only just seen this. Not going to reopen, overwhelming consensus through repeated AfD that this player is not notable. No keep votes in the last AFD, no action taken that any another admin wouldn't have taken, had no idea I had previously closed an identical nomination. Please explain how a different conclusion would have been reached in this discussion by a different admin. Fenix down (talk) 22:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm perplexed how previous close was so close (I'd hardly call that overwhelming), but I can easily find more GNG coverage since the last AFD. I'm also perplexed why I didn't see this during the period. one, two three and four. Honestly, this one, with GNG coverage, looks better than the other NFOOTBALL one we are bickering about. Nfitz (talk) 03:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- I agree, but people's opinion changes and sometimes different editors are involved at different points. I'd completely forgotten about the previous AfD, but the latest one was a 5-0 for delete. There was no other option really. Fenix down (talk) 10:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm perplexed how previous close was so close (I'd hardly call that overwhelming), but I can easily find more GNG coverage since the last AFD. I'm also perplexed why I didn't see this during the period. one, two three and four. Honestly, this one, with GNG coverage, looks better than the other NFOOTBALL one we are bickering about. Nfitz (talk) 03:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't get a response on this User:Fenix down. Nfitz (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- To be honest, I never saw the AFD. But hang on - I thought the closer was supposed to be uninvolved - which means that someone else should close it. There was no clear consensus on the second AFD. I'm not sure why the third would be less so given the coverage since then. Nfitz (talk) 23:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
I'm not seeing how it's a delete. There were only three delete votes after I added sources. One noted that the sources were "local" - and when I queried them (as they hardly local), they didn't respond. The other two didn't mention GNG, and didn't address the references.
Looks to me that no one has evaluated the sources. Nfitz (talk) 23:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Let's not make presumptions about what editors may or my not have done. The three delete votes after you all say he fails GNG (one which specifically discussed GNG and two of them agreeing with the nomination that specifically notes gng failure). This was a 6 to 3 concensus to delete and of those three keep votes 1 of them was keep citing WP:FOOTYN, so doesn't really count as it doesn't cite a valid guideline, so really only 6-2. Sorry but this isnt a no consensus close. Fenix down (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the vote count has to do with it. I'm not sure why you stress (and dismiss) the one keep (which was clearly in error - as I commented myself during the AFD), and ignore that all the deletes after I improved the article were flawed. Nfitz (talk)
- Nfitz, I haven't always agreed with Fenix's closes of football AfDs, but I don't see anything wrong here. (Also note I didn't participate in the discussion, but I would also have voted to delete.) If you want to rescue the article, I'd recommend asking for a draft. Fenix, sorry to talk page stalk, it was on my watchlist for some reason and I thought this was a new footy AfD. SportingFlyer T·C 19:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- What about the years of GNG sources for him User:SportingFlyer such as one and two? Nfitz (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- In a blurb, those are all "Youth player scores in youth game/youth player gets called up." I think it's reasonable that those were discounted, though I don't like when users ignore GNG sources from other languages, those don't do it for me. He's WP:TOOSOON. We can recreate it when he appears for Bangladesh. SportingFlyer T·C 20:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- It would be more convincing if you said if, rather than when. And if there weren't so many other examples, User:SportingFlyer over such a long period of time three, four, five, six, seven - which is interesting because he's using his fame to discuss covid, eight .... Nfitz (talk)
- I Google translated a couple at random and the COVID one really is really suggestive to me. They all discuss him in the context of being a good youth footballer who either performed well in a youth tournament or got called up to further his development. I'd be surprised if he doesn't go on to become notable, but if he stops playing tomorrow, I don't think he is. SportingFlyer T·C 21:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- It would be more convincing if you said if, rather than when. And if there weren't so many other examples, User:SportingFlyer over such a long period of time three, four, five, six, seven - which is interesting because he's using his fame to discuss covid, eight .... Nfitz (talk)
- In a blurb, those are all "Youth player scores in youth game/youth player gets called up." I think it's reasonable that those were discounted, though I don't like when users ignore GNG sources from other languages, those don't do it for me. He's WP:TOOSOON. We can recreate it when he appears for Bangladesh. SportingFlyer T·C 20:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- What about the years of GNG sources for him User:SportingFlyer such as one and two? Nfitz (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Nfitz, I haven't always agreed with Fenix's closes of football AfDs, but I don't see anything wrong here. (Also note I didn't participate in the discussion, but I would also have voted to delete.) If you want to rescue the article, I'd recommend asking for a draft. Fenix, sorry to talk page stalk, it was on my watchlist for some reason and I thought this was a new footy AfD. SportingFlyer T·C 19:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the vote count has to do with it. I'm not sure why you stress (and dismiss) the one keep (which was clearly in error - as I commented myself during the AFD), and ignore that all the deletes after I improved the article were flawed. Nfitz (talk)
The bottom line is the closing admin has to assess arguments in the AfD. You tried, and I gave you time, to assert GNG. Unfortunately there simply wasn't consensus that what you did was enough. Delete votes after you tried to improve the article all clearly referenced GNG failure. Fenix down (talk) 22:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I've not convinced they did ... and I never even saw them in AFD. I'm not convinced we are having proper participation during AFD currently, with all the strangeness in world. Okay ... put it in Draft, and I'll see what I can do to improve it. Nfitz (talk) 03:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- But no closing admin should make such assumptions. Happy to retore to your userspace to work on. Fenix down (talk) 10:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sure. Ta Nfitz (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- I haven't seen that restore yet. Nor a response about Ishan Pandita that you've now archived! Nfitz (talk) 23:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- This should now be in you userspace. Regarding Ishant Pandita, the thread was archived automatically by a bot btw, not me, I'm happy that salting is appropriate. It was the third time the article was created and there is clear consensus that despite there being some sources, the player isn't notable. Fenix down (talk) 07:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- The second AFD wasn't exactly unanimous, with some good sources - and how do you account for the GNG sources that have surfaced SINCE then? The third AFD was under-attended, and failed to consider any of the new GNG sources, and was improperly closed. It should be reopened for further discussion. Nfitz (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- The third AfD was a 5-0 unanimous decision. I'm happy that's consensus. Fenix down (talk) 06:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I haven't disagreed with you - but that only covers one of the five reasons to review a deletion per WP:DRVPURPOSE. Primarily I'm raising 3, and 5 is also a concern (though no point mentioning if it wasn't for 3). Nfitz (talk) 16:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what you want me to do, a page has been deleted three times and the last time unanimously and several editors felt that enough was enough and the page should be protected to prevent further recreation without proper review. You presented some sources above which go some way potentially to showing GNG which is why I restored that article to your userspace so you could work on it. Do you want this one restored to your userspace? If so, please say and I will. The page will remain salted and when you have prepared a draft you can apply here for someone independent to review and consider whether it should be recreated, or you can use DRV. At the moment, because I cannot reliably interpret the sources you present, I am not going to unsalt an article deleted through multiple AfDs. Fenix down (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don't want it in my userspace if it's salted. What I'm asking you to do is reopen the AFD to allow for the presentation of new information. Nfitz (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- No, I dont know how many times I have to say this, consensus was clear and unanimous, and the article has previously been deleted multiple times. You missed your chance to partake, we don't open old AfDs because someone has found new sources. How long would you leave it before it was too long to reopen? A week? A month? A year? You've presented some links, you've offered no indication how they would satisfy GNG, just "here are links, therefore GNG". You'll go through the normal process like everyone else. If you think there is content in your links which will satisfy GNG, I am happy to restore the article to your userspace, you can work on it and present a draft for assessment through the usual channels as outlined below to be assessed by an uninvolved admin. Unless you want me to restore to your userspace I have nothing further to add to this conversation. Fenix down (talk) 21:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don't want it in my userspace if it's salted. What I'm asking you to do is reopen the AFD to allow for the presentation of new information. Nfitz (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what you want me to do, a page has been deleted three times and the last time unanimously and several editors felt that enough was enough and the page should be protected to prevent further recreation without proper review. You presented some sources above which go some way potentially to showing GNG which is why I restored that article to your userspace so you could work on it. Do you want this one restored to your userspace? If so, please say and I will. The page will remain salted and when you have prepared a draft you can apply here for someone independent to review and consider whether it should be recreated, or you can use DRV. At the moment, because I cannot reliably interpret the sources you present, I am not going to unsalt an article deleted through multiple AfDs. Fenix down (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I haven't disagreed with you - but that only covers one of the five reasons to review a deletion per WP:DRVPURPOSE. Primarily I'm raising 3, and 5 is also a concern (though no point mentioning if it wasn't for 3). Nfitz (talk) 16:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- The third AfD was a 5-0 unanimous decision. I'm happy that's consensus. Fenix down (talk) 06:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- The second AFD wasn't exactly unanimous, with some good sources - and how do you account for the GNG sources that have surfaced SINCE then? The third AFD was under-attended, and failed to consider any of the new GNG sources, and was improperly closed. It should be reopened for further discussion. Nfitz (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- This should now be in you userspace. Regarding Ishant Pandita, the thread was archived automatically by a bot btw, not me, I'm happy that salting is appropriate. It was the third time the article was created and there is clear consensus that despite there being some sources, the player isn't notable. Fenix down (talk) 07:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- I haven't seen that restore yet. Nor a response about Ishan Pandita that you've now archived! Nfitz (talk) 23:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sure. Ta Nfitz (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- But no closing admin should make such assumptions. Happy to retore to your userspace to work on. Fenix down (talk) 10:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
Technical news
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Orphaned non-free image File:Transport United Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Transport United Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nuuk Idraetslag FC Logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Nuuk Idraetslag FC Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
New article
Hi Fénix ! I hope your ok.
I’m writing to you because I was wondering if you could create an article for Max Heyes ( Radio 4 producer ) I seen you created the Radio 4 page, so I thought you are the right person for this. Thank you so much ! Ladystardust37 (talk) 00:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Selenge Press FC Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Selenge Press FC Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Closing PROD
Can you please close PROD on Kickstart FC as well? Thanks. Coderzombie (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Fenix down (talk) 21:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Why didn't you relist? The Keep arguments were fairly floored in my opinion. Govvy (talk) 08:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- I am also curious how you came to assess that there was sufficient consensus to keep the article in this deletion discussion? Could you please help me to understand your decision making in this case? Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 12:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Fenix down. Was going to thank you for reviewing this page, but see Govvy has got here first! I was just going to ask given you have decided to keep this page doesn't that mean you are happy with the general concept of having pages like this (as to me seems obvious from many articles in many sports)? Therefore should not other similar articles be kept (maybe improved)? I have just found it a bit tiresome replying to what I see as poorly justified complaints and would prefer to only address what you obviously still see as valid given the decision to relist. Thanks. Jopal22 (talk) 12:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- I didnt relist because there was only one other delte vote. It seemed pretty clear that consensus in this case was to keep. Looks like there are some clean up issues, but that is not a case for AfD. Fenix down (talk) 17:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- I wouldn't want editors to draw conclusions about other articles from this AfD. Each article needs to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- But there are four votes for keeping and technically three for deleting, that's not that clean cut. It should have been relisted for more input in my opinion. I am also saddened by the keep votes and comments, no one is addressing the issues of the article. I don't see anyone reviewing the article for the content and structure provided. O well. Govvy (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Fenix down. Was going to thank you for reviewing this page, but see Govvy has got here first! I was just going to ask given you have decided to keep this page doesn't that mean you are happy with the general concept of having pages like this (as to me seems obvious from many articles in many sports)? Therefore should not other similar articles be kept (maybe improved)? I have just found it a bit tiresome replying to what I see as poorly justified complaints and would prefer to only address what you obviously still see as valid given the decision to relist. Thanks. Jopal22 (talk) 12:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Help
Hi, Fenix down! I need your help. An anonymus user vandalizes The list od tallest buildings in Croatia. Dalmatia Tower isn't the tallest building in Croatia. This skyscraper is not finished yet. Please, can you help me ? Bonzg (talk) 14:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Bonzg (talk) 14:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Khangarid logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Khangarid logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
F.C.Deccan Page deletion
Dear Fenix, I request you to restore the F.C.Deccan page, it is professional football club with and one of the fasting growing clubs in Bengaluru,India.First private club in Bengaluru to build its own facility in 5 acres of land with FIFA standard. FC Deccan Sports Park is the name of the place, kindly Google it. FCD (F.C.Deccan) plays in the top league of Karnataka and will be part of 2nd Division League this year. Also I request you to do some research on the Indian football scenario before deleting pages, it takes of lot of effort to built a page. Also lots of clubs pages are available on wiki which do even exists now, kindly remove them.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Narayans.in (talk • contribs) 13:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, it was deemed non-notable through AfD only a few weeks ago, if you want it resotred you're going to need to indicate GNG sources, please. Fenix down (talk) 14:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FC Ulaanbaatar Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:FC Ulaanbaatar Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Deletion review for Alan Milliner
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alan Milliner. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ivan Milenin (talk) 00:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
You've got mail
₪
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Shahoodu (talk) 16:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Please read my mail fully. Waiting for the reply.
Orphaned non-free image File:Adidas SC Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Adidas SC Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
- Ajpolino • LuK3
Jackmcbarn- Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Premature closure of AfDs
Hi Fenix down,
What was your rationale for closing "these" prematurely?
Hmlarson (talk) 01:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Clear consensus to delete, no realistic chance of a change. 56 minutes early on a week close not really a big deal. Fenix down (talk) 17:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Deletion review for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. season
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. season. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Tell your opinion
An admin has place gng tag in the article West Block Blues now and it has been proposed to merge.As you were in previous afd and merger discussion please tell your opinion there. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:West_Block_Blues#Merge_Request WhiteFalcon1 (talk) 04:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FK Gomzelzheldortrans Gomel Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:FK Gomzelzheldortrans Gomel Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Deletion Review on Alan Milliner
fc astana
https://fcastana.kz/page/emblema
Pls add new logo on page, i dont know and lot of users are lazy
2013 Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. season
Not sure why you closed this, given the clear BEFORE failure, and with no chance to explore where one would find relevant materials. Why not apply WP:NORUSH with brand new questions, in a poorly attended AFD, with one of the only two "delete" comments coming from an editor with a long documented history of lack of competence and a partial topic-ban in the area, who has made it very clear that they vote on their opinion, and not in support of policy? Nfitz (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Three deletes and one comment from yourself, no keeps, no other votes for draft or merge or anything. The references you provided indicate name checks and nothing more. I didnt see anything in there approaching gng. Theres no rush if there's sources indicating potential gng, your comment didn't show that. Did I miss something? Which three of those sources indicated significant coverage to satisfy gng? Your comments on the editor in question are irrelevant if you can't show gng and therefore an issue with the nomination itself. You need to avoid comments like the one above because it is focused on ad hominem not the notability of the subject. Fenix down (talk) 22:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reinstating Folarin Balogun
you deleted Folarin Balogun and he played for Arsenal tonight in the Europa League. Please reinstate his page. thanks
https://www.football.london/arsenal-fc/players/balogun-arsenal-debut-dundalk-win-19190423 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.36.46 (talk) 00:11, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Whilst he did make his debut it was not in a game involving two teams from fully professional leagues as required by WP:NFOOTY. Fenix down (talk) 10:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
WP:FOOTBALL deletions
Regarding your query here, that edit was made by @KingSkyLord: here, presumably in error? GiantSnowman 09:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks GS, I assumed it was in error too, I couldn't see any discussion about removing it on any talk pages. I know it kind of duplicates stuff in the article alert section, but it is better presented than that section plus includes useful information about nominating for deletion so think it should stay. Fenix down (talk) 11:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- @GiantSnowman: Yeah, that was made in error. 😭 My bad. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 16:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Not a problem as far as I am concerned, looked a bit odd that's all given how useful that section is. Fenix down (talk) 23:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- @GiantSnowman: Yeah, that was made in error. 😭 My bad. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 16:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Please Remove the Protection from Ishan Pandita
Hi Fenix down, Ishan Pandita have joined the Indian Super League side FC Goa this year. So I have mended the article and recreated with proper and reliable sources. Now this article is fully following all notability guidelines properly. Do please let me publish the new article and please remove the protection from the page. I have done my work on my sandbox and here it is => https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Debabrata_Sarkar_Mejbill/sandbox Please go through the article on my sandbox and please remove the protection. Thank you Debabrata Sarkar Mejbill (talk) 10:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
I'll publish the article after a match played by Pandita. So please Remove the Protection before the 1st match of FC Goa in the 2020-21 Indian Super League. Thank you Debabrata Sarkar Mejbill (talk) 10:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Let me know when he does play and I will remove the protection then, he's not notable yet and still might never be (though this is less likely now). Fenix down (talk) 13:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Fenix down. Debabrata Sarkar Mejbill (talk) 04:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
Your thoughts?
You recently delete my article, Soccerhub_(website) I found an article about the subject on entrepreneurbreaks https://entrepreneursbreak.com/awonusi-abiodun-also-known-as-oluboytech-is-set-to-unveil-soccerhub-forum.html Could this convince you to revert your actions, just asking. Lynndonald (talk) 16:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Not really, its very short and doesn't in my mind come close to satisfying the notion of "significant coverage" as outlined in WP:GNG. Even with other sources, the brevity of this article means it would carry very little weight unfortunately. Fenix down (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Harrison (soccer)
I think this was a poor close; there was clear consensus to delete. There were no issues or prejudice caused by the bundling of only two articles, and what purpose would be served by re-nominating both again? GiantSnowman 14:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- There absolutely was not clear consensus to delete. Three people voted delete including the nominator, three people requested the opportunity to review individually and one person voted keep to both of them, though didn't actually provide any proper reasoning for that. Yes they probably are both not notable, but that's not a conclusion that can be drawn from the consensus in this discussion. If people want to discuss essentially unrelated articles separately they sbouldbe allowed that if only as a courtesy. Fenix down (talk) 19:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Again, what purpose would separate discussion serve? Nobody who requested that face any indication that the topics were notable or would be kept at a new discussion. This is bureaucracy for the sake of it, and this type of bundling (again, only two articles!) is allowed by WP:MULTIAFD. GiantSnowman 11:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- It would serve clarity and, as I said above, it would serve courtesy, particularly given that in recent weeks there have been a lot of non-notable female footballers nominated and there have been a large number of non-policy related, emotional responses from editors. There's no rush to delete anything and ensuring we are clear on everything and have a genuine consensus avoids issues further down the line. Fenix down (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Again, what purpose would separate discussion serve? Nobody who requested that face any indication that the topics were notable or would be kept at a new discussion. This is bureaucracy for the sake of it, and this type of bundling (again, only two articles!) is allowed by WP:MULTIAFD. GiantSnowman 11:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Review of draft Ishan Pandita AFS
Hi, friend I guess you are on wikipedia since long, I need your help. There is an Indian footballer whose page is been created by me and same time it's in Draft Article for submission as well. We are awaiting someone for reviewing it. Could you please do that.Vishalttplayer (talk) 08:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, given that I was involved in the deletion, its probably better that someone uninvolved makes that call, especially as I have deleted the article twice. Fenix down (talk) 14:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi. After six years of incubation, do you think http://deletionpedia.org/en/Sorin_Virgil_Oproiescu is ready to return? — Jeff G. ツ 18:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. Has he played in a fully professional league, played senior international football or been the subject of sufficient general coverage likely to satisfy GNG? Fenix down (talk) 20:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women