User talk:FaZeCastorm

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laine Taylor (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laine Taylor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laine Taylor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello! FaZeCastorm, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Absolution for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Absolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Absolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galatz^Talk 20:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lana Austin

Hello, FaZeCastorm. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lana Austin, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Lana Austin to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

JSFarman (talk) 22:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Lana Austin, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 18:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Galatz^Talk 03:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

• Upon reviewing the above report, I have blocked your account indefinitely. It appears that you are unable to contribute in a constructive manner to the project. Swarm ♠ 23:08, 5 May 2018 (UTC)