User talk:Extreme Boredom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Sonic Robo Blast 2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Sonic Robo Blast 2 is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Sonic Robo Blast 2 saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. 08:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Last Straw, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Last Straw was changed by Extreme Boredom (u) (t) deleting 7703 characters on 2009-01-28T21:34:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Last Straw constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 21:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot about those. E.B. (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted an edit and then saw a note you left for another editor. I understand now why you are removing the text, but text removed without an explanation will often appear to be vandalism. Please use the edit summary to explain edits, so that other editors can understand your actions. Please let me know if I can help with anything. The warning I had left was removed. Alansohn (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you've read the books, you could help me with the page I'm making. E.B. (talk) 21:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Manny Heffley, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Manny Heffley was changed by Extreme Boredom (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-01-29T02:43:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was an honest mistake; I put an | instead of an #. Sorry. E.B. (talk) 02:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of characters in Diary of a Wimpy Kid[edit]

I have nominated List of characters in Diary of a Wimpy Kid, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in Diary of a Wimpy Kid. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. J.Mundo (talk) 03:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFD nomination of Cheese Touch[edit]

Hi,

You nominated Cheese Touch for deletion via the articles for deletion process. However, as it is a redirect and not an article I have closed that discussion and listed it at RFD instead. I hope you don't mind. If you have any queries ask me on my talk page. regards ascidian | talk-to-me 01:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i hate this site —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.64.132.99 (talk) 22:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rowley Jefferson[edit]

An editor has nominated Rowley Jefferson, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowley Jefferson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Rklawton (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]