User talk:Excedron9238

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Excedron9238, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Your recent editing history at Typhoon Meranti (2016) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
There are a number of problems with your addition. Firstly, there are practically no sources connecting this particular storm to climate change. Secondly, what you wrote isn't even correct: tropical cyclone duration and intensity is a function of many variables. Thirdly, because it isn't the subject of significant coverage, it is undue weight to give such mention. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2017 State of the Union Address for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 State of the Union Address is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 State of the Union Address until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928^Talk 19:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donald Trump speech to joint session of Congress, February 2017 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump speech to joint session of Congress, February 2017 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump speech to joint session of Congress, February 2017 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 21:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]