User talk:Evangp
Speedy deletion nomination of Antrim Forum[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Antrim Forum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DES (talk) 15:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Kings Hall[edit]
The article was cut from an existing article without consultation, take it to the Belle Vue talk page or come up with some new information. J3Mrs (talk) 12:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove referenced and relevant information from well-written articles to make a new one. This is not how Wikipedia works. It is not a question of getting my own way it is simply that the paragraph you removed is an important part of a featured article and one FA criteria is that it must be comprehensive. The redirect sends a reader to the same information, I don't see your problem. Take it to talk. J3Mrs (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, and sorry to pile on here, but you must make sure that if, in future, you copy and paste material from one article to another, you ensure there is an audit trail for contributions, such as linking to the history of the original article in the edit summary of the new article. The copy and paste you carried out is not in compliance with our licencing terms and is technically a copyright violation as it stands. Sorry to add to the list of complaints about your editing too, I know it's not nice when it feels everybody is shouting at you. Nick (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kiel Opera House[edit]
There are at least two different houses, - an we think about disambiguation? Theater Kiel, the opera house (Opernhaus Kiel) would be in English Kiel Opera House, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hoch Auditorium[edit]
You appear to have improperly split Budig Hall into Hoch Auditorium. Please note that since both are the same building, which was rebuilt after a fire. Therefore, the name of the article should match the current name of the subject matter—in this case, Budig Hall. That article can then contain a boldface reference to the former name, along with explanation. Readers searching for the former name should be redirected to the new name, where they can see the explanation.
Please discuss splits like this on the talk page before making such major changes yourself. There are several things that must be considered. For example, after your changes, how would readers who land on the resultant article know that there's another, updated one? No link was provided. Furthermore, the article's history was not moved along with its text. This is standard practice on Wikipedia. Therefore, I will be reverting your good faith changes to both pages. Thanks for understanding. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 08:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Japan Jam[edit]
'''Japan Jam''' was a two-day [[rock festival]] held 4–5 August 1979 on the island of [[Enoshima]] in [[Fujisawa, Kanagawa|Fujisawa]], Japan. Some of the performers included [[The Beach Boys]], [[Heart (band)|Heart]], [[Firefall]] and [[TKO (band)|TKO]].<ref>{{cite web|author=|url=http://blog.livedoor.jp/heavenwindslt/archives/5177439.html |title=多趣味なアナログ親父 : ７９年ジャパン・ジャム 1979'AUGUST JAPAN JAM ビーチ・ボーイズが観れなかった！ |publisher=Blog.livedoor.jp |date=2012-02-07 |accessdate=2014-06-01}}</ref>
==References== {{Reflist}}
[[Category:Rock festivals in Japan]]
Have you thought of using your sandbox for editing this article? If you want me to look over it, let me know. seicer | talk | contribs 19:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Do not try to recreate that article again. Consider this your final warning. Eric Corbett 18:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- It was explained to you further up this page why you should not recreate this article. J3Mrs (talk) 18:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Edge (Palo Alto, California)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Edge (Palo Alto, California) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — IVORK Discuss 23:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of B'Ginnings for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B'Ginnings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B'Ginnings (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Graham Central Station (Phoenix, Arizona) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graham Central Station (Phoenix, Arizona) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Central Station (Phoenix, Arizona) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 04:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of The Sting (nightclub) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sting (nightclub) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sting (nightclub) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 20:32, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Brewery District Pavilion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail notability guidelines at WP:NBUILDING
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Brewery District Pavilion for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brewery District Pavilion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brewery District Pavilion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ifnord (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Kyoritsu Kodo for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyoritsu Kodo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoritsu Kodo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ─ ReconditeRodent « talk · contribs » 19:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Brewery District Pavilion for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brewery District Pavilion (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Onel5969 TT me 14:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Evangp
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Glädjehuset, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Glädjehuset for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glädjehuset until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve Alte Feuerwache[edit]
Hello, Evangp,
Thank you for creating Alte Feuerwache.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thanks for the article! However, how does this music venue/former fire station pass the general notability guideline WP:GNG, which requires multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources demonstrating WP:SIGCOV? The current ref is a database-like site (non-SIGCOV), my WP:BEFORE search mainly found trivial mentions or routine property details, see 1, 2, 3, [1]. The refs for the French version is slightly better, but it also just has two decent refs excepting the external links. However, do they discuss this in sufficient detail to be SIGCOV? Many thanks!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
VickKiang (talk) 02:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Théâtre Libre (performing arts center) moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Théâtre Libre (performing arts center), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Burgemeester Damen Sportpark has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article does not match the notability guidelines for geographic features. The part I would like to point you to is right under WP:GEOROAD the "No Inherited Notability." The only thing that makes this park notable is that there was a festival there, and the guidelines say that it can not inherit notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of De Anza Theatre for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Anza Theatre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Belichickoverbrady (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Shrine Exposition Hall for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrine Exposition Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
signed, Rosguill talk 00:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Daddy's Dance Hall moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Daddy's Dance Hall, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
April 2023[edit]
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dominion Voting Systems, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- You and I both know I did not vandalize. You simply don't like what I wrote. Evangp (talk) 10:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- It is disgusting what is happening in the world, You should be ashamed of yourself for contributing to the horrific lies. Evangp (talk) 10:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- See below, don't use WIkipedia to promote conspiracy theories, and don't attack other editors again. If anything like this happens again, you will lose editing privileges. Acroterion (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Acroterion (talk) 12:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Théâtre Libre (performing arts center) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Théâtre Libre (performing arts center) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Onel5969 TT me 10:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Daddy's Dance Hall[edit]
Hello, Evangp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daddy's Dance Hall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
A MINOTAUR (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The article Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
NN building, fails WP:NBUILD. -
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
December 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Strange Affair (album) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
February 2024[edit]
You can't just say an album is notable. We can't take your word for it. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Many say this album is notable. You are the only one saying it's not notable. Evangp (talk) 07:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- THEN PROVE IT. Provide your sources. And I am NOT the only one. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, I am not going to prove anything, I am not wasting anymore of my time with this. This is not important enough to deal with a total fool like yourself. Evangp (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- THEN PROVE IT. Provide your sources. And I am NOT the only one. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Vestlandhalle for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vestlandhalle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Boleyn (talk) 09:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
The article The Station (Florida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Cannot find any reliable sources that go in-depth about the subject. Barely any passing mentions.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Mike 🗩 15:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of The Station (Florida) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Station (Florida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.