User talk:EpicTiger87

Welcome![edit]

Hello, EpicTiger87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - FlightTime (open channel) 19:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction[edit]

Hello, I am the user who has been ip editing on 67.60.186.104 recently, relating to the John de Lancie issue. I plan to travel soon and therefore be on dynamic ips that aren't this one, so to solve this issue I decided to make this account. EpicTiger87 (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/67.60.186.104 Note that every contribution by this ip from December 7-9 of 2023 was mine. Since I have this account now, I do not plan on ip editing any longer. EpicTiger87 (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, EpicTiger87![edit]

Happy New Year!

EpicTiger87,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John de Lancie. You were already at a level 4 warning for your edits to this article using your IP. Stop trying to push your controversial claims. Don't insert your edit into the lead and then raise it on the talk page. Where is your source that Discord is his best known vocal role? This exactly the same issue that led to your warnings and the article protection. Rewording it does not change anything. Meters (talk) 22:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DRN[edit]

Can you please self-revert your reply to my post in DRN, ahead of comment by the dispute resolution moderator? We shouldn't be directly replying to each other in that forum. VQuakr (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More generally, you really need to move on to another topic. At some point it's going to become necessary to pursue formal action against you to end the community timesink this has become. Your reply at [1] is yet more demonstration of the WP:ICANTHEARYOU behavior that is rapidly exhausting the community's patience. VQuakr (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the direct response to you, I edited it out, reworded it, and moved it to the general discussion. As for your other point, I replied to your recent comment on the John de Lancie talk page to explain why my new edit is categorically different from my old edit. EpicTiger87 (talk) 01:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for editing it out of that section, but you've already created the case and shouldn't be editing it at all or indirectly replying to people yet, either. Yes I saw your reply at the article talk page, which is still more WP:ICANTHEARYOU as is your discounting of yet another editor at [2]. It's becoming increasingly clear with every edit that your moving on to something else is an action that is going to need to be made for you, not by you. VQuakr (talk) 01:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

blocked[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]