User talk:EnthusiastFRANCE

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

vae victis

Your talk page[edit]

You need to let other people see your archives. I understand you like it a certain way, but it needs to follow Wikipedia guidelines; no one is above this. I think that's what Paul Cyr is getting at. Supadawg - [[User_talk:Supadawg|Talk]] 18:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, discussions (and especially warnings) must be viewable by others. The only time you are allowed to remove anything is if you have strong evidence it was placed in bad-faith. I don't see the harm in having a small archive link at the bottom anyways. Paul Cyr 18:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unbelievable[edit]

I am absolutely shocked. Telling other Wikipedia editors to "go to hell", as you did in your edit summary, is considered extremely rude. I'm making one last request that you stop this behavior and follow Wikipedia guidelines on talk pages and no personal attacks. Supadawg - [[User_talk:Supadawg|Talk]] 18:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Warnings[edit]

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. Paul Cyr 18:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

/Archive 1

Blocked[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your repeated personal attacks on other users, and defacements of various user pages. I have reduced the size of the image on your talk page to allow other people's comments to be visible. You are welcome to continue editing when the block expires. -- Karada 19:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creating sockpuppet accounts to avoid blocking is not a good idea; don't do it, please. -- Karada 19:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Karada, the personal attacks were really starting to get annoying... How long would he happen to be tempblocked for? It may be usefull for me to know, sense I, as well as ~~Berserk~~ Berserk (manga) seem to be a target for his attacks. On another note, there sure are a lot of sockpuppets/copycats/doppelgängers! -Aknorals 01:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again, this time for six months. Nufy8 02:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Segarally2006.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Segarally2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

indef-blocked[edit]

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. Big top 16:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC) See block log. [reply]

You're indefinitely blocked for using sockpuppets. Users are not allowed to create sockpuppets to evade bans. Thanks. --Big top 16:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Berserk_PS2_JP.jpeg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Berserk_PS2_JP.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sandstein 13:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arcadestc1.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Arcadestc1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:NetentryKey.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:NetentryKey.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:R341.battle.gear3.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:R341.battle.gear3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 19:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lastbronx.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lastbronx.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle Gear 3 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle Gear 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle Gear 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 21:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]