User talk:Emilypeterson71

Welcome![edit]

Hi Emilypeterson71! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! GPL93 (talk) 04:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abishur Prakash (February 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abishur Prakash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abishur Prakash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 08:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emilypeterson71! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 08:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abishur Prakash (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nomadicghumakkad were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide in-depth coverage of the subject or his work. For example, source 1 only highlights what he said and doesn't discusses him. May also please read WP:Auhtor. Previous comment of the past reviewer about neutrality still holds true.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abishur Prakash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abishur Prakash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abishur Prakash has been accepted[edit]

Abishur Prakash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 02:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abishur Prakash for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abishur Prakash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abishur Prakash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Emilypeterson71. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Abishur Prakash, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. All of your edits relate to Abishur Prakash. Please disclose if you have a conflict of interest with the subject. 30Four (talk) 07:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, no I do not have any conflict of interest. I plan to create new pages and edit existing ones, I just have not had time to do so. Emilypeterson71 (talk) 19:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account was registered over two years ago. I hope you're able to get to them soon. 30Four (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are no quotas or requirements of how many pages to edit, or how many edits to make, on Wikipedia. I would like to know why you have put a COI notice on the page I created, claiming that I did not reply to you, which I did. Emilypeterson71 (talk) 15:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I left the notice on your page first and noticed you ignored it, editing the page in question first. While it may have been reactionary, I'll direct you towards WP:SPA to understand my perspective. 30Four (talk) 15:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not ignore anything. This is an assumption you are making. You did not give me adequate time to reply, after reading the guidelines, which you shared. Instead of giving me a day or two to get back to you, you filed the COI tag within a few hours of your question. This is not proper conduct on Wikipedia. I recommend in future situations, you exercise some degree of patience, as Wikipedia editing is not the main job for most people. Emilypeterson71 (talk) 15:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The notifications are immediate, much like how you're seeing these messages now. While you're correct in the sense that I should allow more time in the future, the outlook on single purpose accounts, including yourself, doesn't lend to the idea that you would respond at all or in any meaningful way. Your main focus on Abishur Prakash (only editing his page and uploading images only related to him over a course of 2 years) with no other interests/page edits leads me to believe you have a conflict of interest. My belief does not constitute guilt, as you've denied a COI. I have to take you at your word.

Prakash's page remains slightly promotional and requires citations for those two claims on his page, which will otherwise be removed. If any reasonable editor sees unsourced edits related to promoting a subject's career via an account with no other interests other than the subject of the page, they're going to assume a COI of some form. 30Four (talk) 15:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]