User talk:Elektrik Band

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adoption[edit]

Hey Elektrik band! I'd most certainly bewilling to adopt you. I saw that you wanted me to adopt you, but then you removed the message. I'll still adopt you though. Do you accept? The Arbiter 16:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes,I doIsaiah (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Elektrik Band[reply]

Ok, sounds good! Feel free to ask me any questions you might have! The Arbiter (talk) 00:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am done being adopted Elektrik Band 02:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Merry Christmas[edit]

Merry Christmas, Elektrik Band!
At this wonderful time of year, I would like to give season’s greetings to all the fellow Wikipedians I have interacted with in the past! May you have a wonderful holiday season! The ArbiterTalk 02:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Some advice from your adopter[edit]

Hey Elektrik Band! I have a few bits of advice to you.
1. First, when you start a new section on a editor's user talk page, click the "new section" tab at the top of the page rather than clicking "edit". That will make it a new section at the bottom of the page. 2. When you type a colon on the beginning of the line, that is recognized as an indent. The more colons you put, the more you should indent. For example,

Hi there! The ArbiterTalk 02:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! The ArbiterTalk 02:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How are you doing? The ArbiterTalk 02:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm doing great! The ArbiterTalk 02:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you can see how the colons indent. That is how a conversation on a talk page should go.

3. And finally, when you sign your post, all you need to type is ~~~~. You don't need to type anything else after it.

Let me know if you need anything! The ArbiterTalk 02:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

Hey bud thanks for the barnstar you're awesome Nowyouseemescreed 15:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Hi, Elektrik Band, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages - Courcelles 02:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Its okayElektrik Band 21:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Love you like a love song, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ۞ Tbhotch & (ↄ), My comment was grammatically incorrect? Correct it!Click here for terms and conditions 03:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elektrik Band/Secret Page, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Elektrik Band/Secret Page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Elektrik Band/Secret Page during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 22:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Beyoncé Knowles WikiProject
We welcome you to Beyoncé Knowles WikiProject, a collaboration between Wikipedians to improve and organize Beyoncé Knowles related articles. If you have any questions, feel free to post it at the talk page. Also, you might want to add {{WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles/Userbox}} to your User page. Thank you. – Jivesh Talk2Me 05:32, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Vancouver meetup[edit]

Hello,

Wikipedian British Columbians are planning a meetup at the Vancouver Public Library, Central Branch, on Sunday, October 16th, as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! InverseHypercube 03:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please let us know what you think[edit]

My friend, as you know, Beyonce's new album 4 is being handled in a catastrophic way (i do not know if this is a correct word). Please voice your opinion here so that we can decide which format will suit "Party" that best. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

What's up? I was looking at your userpages and see we have a lot of the same interests, so I thought I'd say hey. If you need anything ever just shoot me a message. NYSMtalk page 02:50, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Sincere Wishes For This Festive Season[edit]

★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★* Merry Christmas And Happy New Year 2012 *★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★
I Wish You And Your Family A Merry Christmas And A Happy New Year 2012. May The New Year Bring Much Happiness, Prosperity, Peace, And Success In Your Life. I Am Very Happy To be Part of Wikipedia And To Have Great Friends Like You. Cheers.

- From A Big Fan of ----> Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to that as well. You are welcome and thanks for lovely message. :) You are very nice. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.[edit]

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=96999137 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 11:52, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Research Participation Barnstar
For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Merry Christmas
May your Christmas sparkle with moments of love, laughter and goodwill,

May the year ahead be full of contentment and joy,

May the good times and treasures of the present become the golden memories of tomorrow,

Merry Christmas To U & Ur Family.

Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Beyonce caused a power failure! --Another Believer (Talk) 18:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ARTPOP Consensus[edit]

@Elektrik Band: There has been a long discussion on the ARTPOP talk page about what the critical reception section should state and I'm attempting to bring in outside opinions as the discussion has gotten stagnant. Just to make sure you understand the situation fully, here are the nine sources I've listed that explicitly state that the album received generally positive reviews: DigitalSpy, Metacritic's weighted consensus of generally favorable, The Huffington Post, Entertainmentwise, YahooMusic, The Southern Digest, Pride Publishing Group, Off the Shelf, Street Insider. I'm arguing for the page to state that Artpop received general positive reviews with a disclaimer afterwards that states that the reception has been more ambivalent than her past works. STATic has been engaged in this debate for months and has admitted twice that he dislikes Lady Gaga and even made fun of her and her fans, which obviously constitutes WP:Bias. Homeostasis has previously been blocked from editing due to his unprofessional behavior on Gaga pages and has recently admitted that he's been accused numerous times of bias against the artist in question. This has been a ridiculous process that had no business lasting as long as it did, but as you can see, the consensus is obviously generally positive, although the response was more ambivalent than her previous work. Reece Leonard (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge[edit]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada[edit]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

[email protected] 71.88.202.43 (talk) 05:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]