User talk:EK728

November 2013

Hello, I'm Technopat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Ifoghas because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Technopat (talk) 19:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Ifoghas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 22:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

EK728, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi EK728! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 6 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Battle of Meiram page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Azawad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Operation, MAA, Attacked and MIA

Internal conflict in Azawad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to MAA and MIA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 17 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Battle of Menaka page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Aguelhok (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MAA

Battle of Tinzaouaten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Algerian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 2014 Boston Brownstone Fire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Boston Brownstone Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Boston Brownstone Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stephen 01:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Please try to stay within the top three tiers of this hierarchy.

Hello, I'm ProtossPylon. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:EkoGraf that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ProtossPylon 00:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Well Protoss i didn't wikipedia editors were this racist just pickin on me cuz im black — Preceding unsigned comment added by EK728 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 1 April 2014

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:ProtossPylon with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  —Josh3580_talk/hist 00:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Wow you deleted my comment dumb ass— Preceding unsigned comment added by EK728 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 1 April 2014

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:EK728. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing.  —Josh3580_talk/hist 00:51, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:EkoGraf, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ProtossPylon 00:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

You can't block me what right do you have to do that I'll block you first!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EK728 (talk • contribs)

Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia:Blocking policy before you continue. —Josh3580_talk/hist 00:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

You're harassing User:EkoGraf by calling him "autistic" and defacing his user page, and we've given you more than sufficient warnings to stop. The admins have full rights to block you on those grounds. ProtossPylon 01:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Listen brosky I'm telling the truth my homee EkoGraf has a slight form of Autism. I niger aint a niger unless he tell the truth. Now that be true— Preceding unsigned comment added by EK728 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 1 April 2014

"EkoGraf you are a Autistic piece of SHIT". Whether or not you're lying, this is not appropriate conduct. ProtossPylon 01:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Vsmith (talk) 01:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2014 Dagestan House Siege

Hello, EK728. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 2014 Dagestan House Siege, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ravendrop 08:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)