User talk:DilletantiAnonymous

Welcome![edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Holy Innocents Church, South Norwood. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 15:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hans Bontemantel) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Hans Bontemantel, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please move the sources inline? It would be very difficult for another editor to find where each fact has been sourced from. Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 11:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Baptism of Christ (David)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating The Baptism of Christ (David), DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Nicnote just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks fantastic, thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Nicnote's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 16:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard David[edit]

You might like d:Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Creator/Gerard David. The category contains more overviews per painter. Multichill (talk) 10:23, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Antony Dainan) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Antony Dainan, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add more sources

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:53, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please make the reference clearer on this article? 'bol313' won't make much sense to most readers. Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 10:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Noli me tangere (Correggio)[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Noli me tangere (Correggio)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease WP:INLINECITE your sources; this will make it far easier for other editors to expand the article, and for readers to use it for research. It's also very hard for anyone but the creator to rectify this, without going to a lot of trouble.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Campori Madonna) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Campori Madonna, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A good start on the new stub. It could really use additional references though.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— Insert CleverPhrase Here 14:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nurteria bicolor[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Nurteria bicolor!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've tagged this as uncategorised and as a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 05:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Saints Roch, Anthony Abbot and Lucy[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Saints Roch, Anthony Abbot and Lucy!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gustavo primo re di Svezia[edit]

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Gustavo primo re di Svezia!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references with in-depth coverage about the subject from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (St Nicholas Church, Ringwould) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating St Nicholas Church, Ringwould, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great to see a new article on a grade I listed building! And thanks for doing a Wikimedia Commons link. I've added a link from the Grade I listed buildings in Dover (district) article.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Allegory of Vice (Correggio)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Allegory of Vice (Correggio), DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 19:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bolognini Madonna) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Bolognini Madonna, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Texts only found in the Septuagint has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Texts only found in the Septuagint, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Charles Egon IV, Prince of Fürstenberg[edit]

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Charles Egon IV, Prince of Fürstenberg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Adding footnotes would help the reader verify the information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Cinderella157 (talk) 00:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for tagging[edit]

I have been tagging and assessing some milhist articles and see that you have started adding tags. Thankyou. If you look at Heinrich Julius Alexander von Kalb and look at the edit page, you will see how I have made the translation tag appear the same size as the others. When you add the Template:WikiProject Military history, you probably copy it fully to the talk page and then delete the unwanted bits. It would be useful if you left the assessment part (B-Class 5-criteria checklist and the five points) behind. Thankyou in advance. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Karl Joachim, Prince of Fürstenberg[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Karl Joachim, Prince of Fürstenberg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing additional references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please make it clearer what 's. Fickler S. 295' means in your references? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 10:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Joseph Wenzel, Prince of Fürstenberg[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Joseph Wenzel, Prince of Fürstenberg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing better sourcing, and I have de-linked the dates.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Last Judgement (Michelangelo)[edit]

Hi, I can't see any need for this, which will almost certainly only ever contain one article - Last Judgment (Michelangelo) (which I have removed). Was it a mistake? Johnbod (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it was, just add "{ {db-c1} }" (no spaces) to see it off. Johnbod (talk) 20:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Franz Christoph Neubauer[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Franz Christoph Neubauer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Can you please add your source to the article; all articles need references. Thanks for creating this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This page is at risk of being tagged for deletion as it stands, and you have not responded to the original message. I also tried to review Aubin Vouet, but it is also unreferenced. Please add your source. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)::The same for Inácio da Costa Quintela. Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

DilletantiAnonymous, you have not responded to my previous messages; please be aware that WP:Communication is required. You have continued to create unreferenced articles; all articles need sources and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator to WP:VERIFY the information they add - I'd encourage you to click on these links. With an article like Cimetière Sainte-Marguerite, it has 'external links'. These are usually 'friendly suggestions' rather than sources - are they actually your sources? If so, can you please change the heading from 'External links' to 'References' or 'Sources', and preferably WP:INLINECITE them? That makes it so much easier for the reader to see where you have got your information and how reliable it is. I'm happy to help you, just ping me, but please do respond to my message and please do not continue to create articles with no clear references. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could actually assist in finding references rather than being so keen to be the References Police? It's often the result of translating foreign-language ones which didn't have references and which I'm still scratching around for references to make up that deficit. I know, I should hold off on translating until I have sources, yada yada, but the need for translation seemed to outweigh that. I'm making a list of my ones with this issue here so you, me and the world and his wife can assist in this noble cause. DilletantiAnonymous (talk) 11:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I used to think the same, and created many unreferenced articles. I was pretty sure on their content, but there turned out to be serious errors and it cost far more time to rectify than if they'd been deleted and started from scratch. Unreferenced articles on other Wikipedias are not reliable. The articles you've created lack verified information, and it will be very difficult for someone else to go sentence by sentence verifying it. It would be worth you looking at WP:BURDEN - it is your responsibility, no one else's, to verify the information you add to Wikipedia. Boleyn (talk) 18:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sculptures depicting Daniel has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Sculptures depicting Daniel, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films based on the Old Testament apocrypha has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Films based on the Old Testament apocrypha, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Art depicting Hebrew Bible figures by medium has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Art depicting Hebrew Bible figures by medium, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Simon Douglas-Pennant, 7th Baron Penrhyn[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Simon Douglas-Pennant, 7th Baron Penrhyn!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I have removed the links to dates, as we don't link dates on English Wikipedia. Thepeerage.com is also not generally accepted as a reliable source and I have marked it as a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Art depicting Old Testament apocrypha themes has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Art depicting Old Testament apocrypha themes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Book of Revelation art has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Book of Revelation art, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings illustrating the Song of Songs has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Paintings illustrating the Song of Songs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Friderike Elisabeth von Grabow[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Friderike Elisabeth von Grabow!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This also has referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 14:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Philippe Macquer[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Philippe Macquer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. We don't link dates on English Wikipedia; this has been tagged as needing improvements to its sourcing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 09:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sabine Elisabeth Oelgard von Bassewitz) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Sabine Elisabeth Oelgard von Bassewitz, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please stop linking dates on English Wikipedia - it is the consensus that we no longer do this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ignacio de Ries[edit]

Hi, I'm My name is not dave. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Ignacio de Ries!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It is unsure whether the book listed at the bottom is one big reference for the whole page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

!dave 17:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Helmut Glück[edit]

The article Helmut Glück has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 12:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beeblebrox, I'm surprised as this editor has received numerous messages raising concerns about their creations over the last couple of months, most of which weren't responded to. Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pamela (paintings), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages[edit]

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The unsourced material you added to February 14 has been reverted since there were multiple additions. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

St Luke's Church, Euston Road[edit]

In case you didn't know, this article is proposed for a merge at [1]. If you have additional sources for notability of the C19 church, you may want to add them. --Cedders^tk 18:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libro de' Disegni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Castelvecchio and Triton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stefano Bonsignori[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Stefano Bonsignori requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Dunkirk evacuation[edit]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/dover-castle/history-and-stories/operation-dynamo-things-you-need-to-know/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Places of birth and death[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biographies#Birth_date_and_place for guidance. Places of birth and death should not go between the brackets. Deb (talk) 15:16, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

East Anglia project[edit]

Regarding this edit, while I appreciate that it was to undo your own edit, the map still does not match the caption (Essex is not displayed in pink). Is it the map or the caption that is wrong? Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 16:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Truth in advertising?[edit]

Nice username. Have a cookie. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Georg Giese does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Hello- I'm not sure we need articles on both Georg Giese and the Holbein portrait of him, as he may be mostly notable because of the portrait. Eric ^talk 12:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portrait of Nicolaus Kratzer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Church in Wales hymnwriters[edit]

I'm wondering if this is a legitimate title for the category. The Church in Wales only came into existence in 1920; all but one of those currently named in the category died before that date. Deb (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Heston does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I see you were warned about this just over a month ago. Please abide by community standards and provide edit summaries. DDStretch (talk) 21:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

Hi - Please can you add citations to your additions to 22nd (County of London) Battalion (The Queen’s), 23rd (County of London) Battalion and 24th (County of London) Battalion (The Queen’s). Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added citations and amended some of the material you added so that the dates are correct (or at least conform to the citations I have added). I note that you have been asked before to add citations and edit summaries. Please can you do so if editing wikipedia. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 22:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About Stories of Moses and the Evangelists[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous,
I've noticed there is no internet English language mention of this purported series of paintings, aside from this article. Similarly it:Storie di Mosè ed Evangelisti - la cosa stessa ed il problema identico. It would appear to me a concatenation of two different series of works by Beccafumi. Your thoughts about this?
Pietro di Melbourne aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation of Jesus at the Temple[edit]

Hi, Please note this is not regarded as part of the "Nativity". One could start a seperate cat for it - there's an oddly stranded & incomplete Presentation of Jesus at the Temple (disambiguation). Not to be confused with the Presentation of Mary. Johnbod (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prolific[edit]

You seem to be a prolific creator of visual art pages. Thank you for that. I am worried after going through some of your pages (not even all of them) just for 10 July that you may have hundreds if not thousands of paintings which may not have the title italicized and, as importantly, missed on artist's templates. You don't seem to add your pages onto the templates, and there, as I mentioned, could be hundreds of pages missed. If you've kept a list of painting pages you've created somewhere that would help tremendously. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your article stubs about important paintings[edit]

I see you are on a roll to reduce the backlog on the Gentileschi painters. Thanks so much for that! I also did some work on both of them a while ago and if you do find an image on Commons to use in one of your stubs, then I think you will find also that I already linked it to its Wikidata item. From there is a small step to adding your new article title to the Wikidata sitelink for said painting. I believe there is a way to add the Wikidata references automagically into your stub, thus decreasing your chances of getting annoyed messages from Wikipedians who don't like to see reference-less stubs showing up in their watchlists. In any case, I don't want to burden you with extra tasks, but after adding sitelinks for several of your recent creations I thought I would take a stab at convincing you that adding your new articles to Wikidata is a helpful thing to do. Thanks in any case for the work you have already done. Jane (talk) 08:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced orphan substubs[edit]

Just to echo the comments above, it is great that you are creating new articles on important artworks. Given the rate you are working, I suspect you are using some sort of semi-automated algorithm, perhaps based on machine translation or the content at Wikidata. Just three comments.

Unreferenced: Please could you consider adding at least some references, even if just a link to a catalogue raisonée or (where relevant) a museum page.
Stubby: Some of them are nice little articles, but many are one line substubs (eg Woman by a Window, which indidenally I suspect should be moved to Woman at the Window). Where you can, please add more.
Orphan: I know you are adding categories, but please could you add the navigation template for the artist, where one exists, eg {{Caspar David Friedrich}}, and add the new articles to the template too. That at least ensures that there are some links from other articles to your new ones, so there is more chance that someoene else might spot them and improve them.

Thanks again. 213.205.198.245 (talk) 11:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References; notability[edit]

Please do take on board the points that previous editors have made about referencing / sourcing the picture stubs you are producing in quantity, and also, that not every painting of which there is an image in Commons is notable enough for an independent article. Best wishes, Eustachiusz (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Good and Evil (painting), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athanase Coquerel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Banquet of Cleopatra[edit]

Something like that should have been proposed on the talk page first. Currently you have managed to screw up the references on both articles, and the Tiepolo doesn't seem to link to the generic one. Have you sorted incoming links? Quality is important as well as quantity. Johnbod (talk) 15:30, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Templates[edit]

You are wonderful, and are filling the Wikipeda artist's collections . Yet please (pretty please with an original Rubens sketch on top) consider adding your pages to the artists templates, and the templates to the pages (past, present, and future?). I and others can catch some of them, but judging from your recent output, how many of your art articles are missed, untemplated, and alone out there in the Wikipedian universe. Dozens, hundreds? I dare to say, more? You deserve podium status (you can tell what I'm watching on the tube), but please remember the finicky template fans and readers, and throw us a few. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop these drastic undiscussed category changes![edit]

You have emptied Category:Etchings by Rembrandt. This should be discussed, as should any significant rearrangement.
Please DON'T add relatively common prints to individual museum categories - these will be in over 100 museums. See the note on the BM page: "Drawings in the Department of Prints and Drawings at the British Museum, and prints with a special connection with the collection that is mentioned in the article, for example unique copies. Most common, and very many rare prints, will also be in the collection, but should not be categorized here." Categories need to be "defining" for the object, and for most prints being in a particular collection is not.
Please format your refs correctly, and call them references. No bare urls please.
Where there is an English version of a museum page, please use and reference that - this will avoid mistakes arising from your own translations

It is good to see new articles, even if very short, but frankly following you around and tidying up is becoming irksome! Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:GoldenHill.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:GLAM/Metropolitan Museum of Art[edit]

Thank you for your contributions covering the Met collection! Feel free to add yourself to Wikipedia:GLAM/Metropolitan Museum of Art/Members if you like. Also, let me know if you could ever use a Met publication, or something from the museum's libraries, to help write a particular article, or if I can assist in any other way.--Pharos (talk) 18:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saying Grace[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous, I wanted to let you know that I have messed around with your Saying Grace (painting) disambiguation page. I decided to be bold and create Saying grace as a disambiguation page to include the paintings and Grace (prayer). Saying Grace (painting) is now a redirect to the disambiguation page. If you would like to discuss any part of this, please let me know. Leschnei (talk) 00:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox artwork[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous, I see you added a lot of articles about paintings I added to Wikidata. Nice! Would you mind adding {{Infobox artwork/wikidata}} when you create a new article about a painting? This will fetch quite a bit of (sourced) metadata and an image from the Wikidata item (if available). Thanks, Multichill (talk) 11:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add the wikidata infobox template, see the discussion at wikiproject visual arts. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas More, Lord High Chancellor of England[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Thomas More, Lord High Chancellor of England, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hzh (talk) 22:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about A Knight at Prayer in a Chapel, Preparing Himself for Combat[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether A Knight at Prayer in a Chapel, Preparing Himself for Combat should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Knight at Prayer in a Chapel, Preparing Himself for Combat .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Hzh (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Thomas More, Lord High Chancellor of England[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Thomas More, Lord High Chancellor of England should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas More, Lord High Chancellor of England .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Hzh (talk) 11:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous. In light of the minor but continuing concerns about your article creations, I have removed the autopatrolled user right from your account. This does not affect your ability to create articles, it simply means that they will resume being reviewed by other editors through new page patrol. Thank you for your contributions. – Joe (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The concerns are mostly about references, please add them if you can. And note that museum names are capitalized (Musee instead of musee). Thanks. Been doing a lot of edits on your pages, mostly to italicize the titles, the upper case, adding templates, etc. Thanks again for all the good page additions. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hôtel de Groesbeeck - de Croix[edit]

Hi, I'm Vexations. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Hôtel de Groesbeeck - de Croix!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Can you please add some citations? The French article has them.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Vexations (talk) 13:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pierre-Michel de Lovinfosse[edit]

Hi, I'm Vexations. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Pierre-Michel de Lovinfosse!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The corresponding French and Dutch articles have sources. Could youplease add those? Thanks,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Vexations (talk) 15:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again! Rodin pages[edit]

Hi. I came across your Rodin work of earlier this year, and added 38 or so to the Rodin template (check it out, {{Auguste Rodin}}) and some links in other templates (Victor Hugo, Camille Claudel). Again, thank you, extremely nice work. Wikipedia at its best. Randy Kryn (talk) 17:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pietá (Ribera, 1637)[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Pietá (Ribera, 1637)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This gas been tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Saint Peter in Penitence (Ribera)[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Saint Peter in Penitence (Ribera)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please WP:INLINECITE references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:34, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ixion (Ribera)[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Ixion (Ribera)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 3 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tityos (Ribera)[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Tityos (Ribera)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 3 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added to template[edit]

Because of the tags above I was able to see your Ribera pages and have added them to the {{Jusepe de Ribera}} template, which is looking good. Can you maybe list other artists you have worked on where pages for the template may have been missed? Thanks. And do you take requests (Pre-Raphaelites please?)? Randy Kryn (talk) 12:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanni Bianconi (journalist)[edit]

Can you please work on this in draftspace? I see my name appears on your talk page 45 times - I've spent a lot of time trying to clean up the referencing on your articles. If you need help, see Help:Referencing for beginners or ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Boleyn (talk) 16:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1476 Altarpiece moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 1476 Altarpiece, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:13, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1476 Altarpiece has been accepted[edit]

1476 Altarpiece, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to mainspace after a little cleanup. The sources are sufficient, and all major paintings such as this are appropriate for an article.

But I must give you some advice:

It is nowadays considered unhelpful to write such minimal stubs, especially when there is an abundance of good material available--and most especially when there is a decent article in another Wikipedia to use as a basis. (In such cases, at the very least, add the tag for expand language, such as I have done to several of your recent articles, so people know there is more to be found)

For content such as this, it is probably best to translate the entire article if it is of high quality, but you may abridge or adapt it in any way that you like. When you do these translations/adaptation, be aware that the Italian and German WPs interpret the sourcing requirement differently than the English WP -- we much prefer to have detailed sourcing to specific references, not just references at the end. If you can clean this up, do, but if not, in any case give all the references from the original, so others know to work on it. Though it may sometimes seem that our enWP coverage is mainly of more trivial topics, we do have many editors who can work on these. You might want to ask Pharos, the Wikipedian in Residence at the Metropolitan Museum of New York, for assistance when dealing with artworks, though I don't think he does translations specifically. (I can help with that part a little, but I really don't have the time to do as much as I would like). DGG ( talk ) 06:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

please remember to at least add the "expand language" tags. DGG ( talk ) 19:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Charles of Bourbon Hunting Coots on Lake Licola moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Charles of Bourbon Hunting Coots on Lake Licola, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CASSIOPEIA, there seems to be a good source on the page, does it need to be cited as a reference and not as a source? An interesting painting, thanks for pointing it out and to DilletantiAnonymous for creating the article. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Kryn and DilletantiAnonymous, Greetings to you. The only source provided in the dreaft see HERE, leads to a "503 service unavailable page" for such the claimed of the content can not be verified. Secondly, 3 independent, reliable sources are need to demonstrate the subject notability. Sources would be in any languages as long as the are independent and reliable. Once the sources are found and inline citated, do send me a message and I will review it. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't click on the source. Three sources seems a high bar, I thought just one good source is needed for notability. And the artwork image itself seems a good source. I would think that existing paintings exhibited in notable museums, especially those with articles in other Wikipedias, should pass the process with one good citation. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Kryn and DiletantiAnonymous, Greetings to you. Wikipedia is an encylopiedia for such information added/changed need to support by sourced. To merit a page/article in Wikipedia, first the subject need to be notable accordingly to Wikpedia guidelines. Secondly the content need to be support by [[WP:IS|independent], reliable sources for verification and in significant coverage (3 sources) where by the subject is talk about in depth and in length and not merely passing mentioned. If a subject is notable and well known, 3 sources are not hard to find as source would be in any languages as long as they fit the above requirements. Hope the above help. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:17, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for summarizing the policy guideline. But from your understanding and description of it I would estimate that 80-90% of Wikipedia's visual arts pages don't contain three such in-depth sources. Articles about paintings and sculptures considered important surely do, and many thousands of English Wikipedia pages on the important topics meet that strict criteria. But there are tens of thousands of visual arts pages where one or two good sources has been sufficient, and that seems to be the tradition as well as the language from WP:SIGCOV ("There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. Sources do not have to be available online or written in English"). You're talking about adhering to a more restrictive rule which would purge entire Art Wings of Wikipedia (AWW). Randy Kryn (talk) 18:54, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What the policy ACTUALLY SAYS is "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected". User:CASSIOPEIA, please don't misrepresent policy. In the case of works of art, the museums's own publications such as catalogues are nearly always the best source, and, if well-used, should be efficient to establish notability. Johnbod (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Johnbod Greetings to you. The policy does not specify the number of independent reliable sources with in dept coverage, but do indicate significant coverage, as 1 or 2 sources would not considered significant coverage, for such at least three would be the start of "significant coverage" and that was the reason I indicate 3 on the above message. Thank you for joining this discussion. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk)

Nonsense - the policy is clear, and that is your personal elaboration of it. You should not go around pretending that is what the policy says. Have a nice day! Your comments are valuable to us! Johnbod (talk) 03:36, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If a page is giving a 503 you could just check the wayback machine. Looks like a normal stub to me or does someone question the notability of this artwork? Multichill (talk) 22:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow I am really sad to read this discussion. This is an incredibly important painting for several reasons and definitely belongs on Wikipedia for all of those reasons. I didn't check yet, but this file or another version of it are probably used in various articles all over Wikipedia in various languages. A 404 should not be a reason to deny the draft, but the reader should be, as Multichill says, prompted to retrieve the wayback version (which certainly exists in some form). Any google search will bring up a multitude of sources for this specific painting (maybe my google searches are heavily skewed to art though). In any case, here is an old catalog entry from the museum in italian) and here is a modern tweet by the museum [https://twitter.com/Capodimonte_mus/status/827276750472163329 with a color pic. It would be nice to include the catalog number of an independent Vernet catalog, but with all the incoming links the article stub just needs to prove the image is indeed the correct Naples one. The art world is such that for even important paintings such as this one, often the sources are not available online. The situation is sadly worse for artworks hanging in Italy than in other European countries. That does not mean they don't exist or that paintings in Italy are in any way less notable. Good Grief! Jane (talk) 08:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice finds Jane, and comment. CASSIOPEIA, maybe, since notability about artworks has been discussed here, you can take some time and go back into your editing history and rescue pages you may have inadvertently removed from visible space because of the misunderstanding about number of sources required. That would be nice, and beneficial to Wikipedia's art collection. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it is indeed "an incredibly important painting for several reasons" the article does absolutely nothing to indicate or explain this (except that there is a copy in Versailles I suppose). I presume an "assertion of notability" still features in the AFD verbiage. Johnbod (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Randy Kryn: Greetings and understand. This is the the isolated case, many notable subject pre-internet era would suffer the same thing. Article content needs to be supported by sources (inline citations) to verify the content. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. Sources could be found online or in paper form (books, journals and etc) and could be in any languages. As long as sources are added in, then the draft would be resubmit for review. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:20, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harvest Time at Carditello moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Harvest Time at Carditello, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reverted this - see previous discussion. Johnbod (talk) 16:07, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Annunciation with St John the Baptist and St Andrew[edit]

Hi, I'm Vexations. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Annunciation with St John the Baptist and St Andrew!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please check for dead links before including them. The article is almost entirely unsourced. I checked the museum website and found only a single mention that confirms that the painting is in its collection.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Vexations (talk) 13:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Temples of Paestum) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating The Temples of Paestum, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Vexations just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

All links to http://cir.campania.beniculturali.it/museodicapodimonte/ are broken. The museum's website doesn't appear to host the content anymore. Do you know if they still might have the descriptions of the works in their collection somewhere? Thanks,

To reply, leave a comment on Vexations's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Vexations (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Holy Family with the Infant Saint John the Baptist (Parmigianino)[edit]

Hi, I'm Vexations. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Holy Family with the Infant Saint John the Baptist (Parmigianino)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please see the talk page

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Vexations (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear DilletantiAnonymous, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent creation of a Portrait of a Knight of Malta. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 20:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anupam Ahem. This translation of an Italian article is actually quit problematic. The citation <ref>Cook, 1893</ref> for example, should refer to an entry in a list of sources. I suspect that the Cook mentioned is Herbert Frederick Cook, who wrote Cook, Herbert Frederick (1904). Giorgione. London: G. Bell & Sons., albeit not published in 1893. He attributed the painting to, well, Giorgione, not Titian. Both of you, please, be a little more careful with the sources. Vexations (talk) 21:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Madonna of the Roses[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Madonna of the Roses!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add clear, preferably WP:INLINECITED references to the articles you create.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Portrait of Charles IV of Spain[edit]

Thanks for creating Portrait of Charles IV of Spain.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for 2 issues. Please WP:INLINECITE sources - it makes it so much easier for readers and editors.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Portrait of Charles of Bourbon in Hunting Dress[edit]

Thanks for creating Portrait of Charles of Bourbon in Hunting Dress.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

PLease WP:INLINECITE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Francis I and His Family[edit]

Thanks for creating Francis I and His Family.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please WP:INLINECITE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Madonna of Divine Love[edit]

Thanks for creating Madonna of Divine Love.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please WP:INLINECITE the sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Andreas Gottlieb Masch[edit]

Thanks for creating Andreas Gottlieb Masch.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please WP:INLINECITE your references. This makes a lot of work for other editors.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Holy Ring[edit]

Thanks for creating Holy Ring.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

You are persistently creating articles which don't have refrneces or have extremely poor sourcing - please top.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Ring moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Holy Ring, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Allegory of Chastity[edit]

Thanks for creating Allegory of Chastity.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

It is unclear if 'bibliography' means 'suggestions for further reading' or 'sources'. Please add clear, WP:INLINECITED references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Royalist (1841) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, HMS Royalist (1841), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rest on the Flight into Egypt (Titian) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Rest on the Flight into Egypt (Titian), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sciarra Madonna[edit]

Thanks for creating Sciarra Madonna.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please WP:INLINECITE your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lochis Madonna (Titian)[edit]

Thanks for creating Lochis Madonna (Titian).

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add more sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Entombment of Christ (Lotto)[edit]

Thanks for creating The Entombment of Christ (Lotto).

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 12:30, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deposition of Christ (Lotto) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Deposition of Christ (Lotto), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 12:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Entombment of Christ (Lotto) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Entombment of Christ (Lotto), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Assumption of the Virgin (Lotto)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Assumption of the Virgin (Lotto) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 18:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christ Leading the Apostles to Mount Tabor[edit]

A tag has been placed on Christ Leading the Apostles to Mount Tabor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan Police (Receiver) Act 1861 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Metropolitan Police (Receiver) Act 1861, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Metropolitan Police (Receiver) Act 1861 has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Metropolitan Police (Receiver) Act 1861. Thanks! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:28, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Metropolitan Police Act 1861[edit]

A tag has been placed on Metropolitan Police Act 1861 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your page creations[edit]

Please take more time in creating articles, and make sure to include secondary references that demonstrate notability. Wikipedia is not a directory of all paintings by the various Old Masters; there's no presumption that Saint Jerome in Penitence (Lotto, Rome) (for example) is notable. The only reference you provide is a broken link to the musuem where the painting is located. If there are no detailed sources about these paintings, the articles are likely to be deleted or redirected to Lorenzo Lotto. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing[edit]

Can you please mark category change edits as minor please, its very difficult to monitor watchpages otherwise. Ceoil (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Metropolitan Police Act 1899[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Metropolitan Police Act 1899! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Metropolitan Police Act 1887[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Metropolitan Police Act 1887! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Metropolitan Police Act 1886[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Metropolitan Police Act 1886! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Blessed Jacopone da Todi (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Blessed Jacopone da Todi (painting)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Annunciation (Uccello)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Annunciation (Uccello)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Defence of Cádiz against the English) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating The Defence of Cádiz against the English.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice article on an excellent painting, helps to wrap references in additional details. Check out my edits and ping me if you ever need help.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:16, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Christ on the Cross (Zurbarán)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Christ on the Cross (Zurbarán)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Death of Hercules[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating The Death of Hercules! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hercules and the Hydra[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Hercules and the Hydra! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help readers find your articles[edit]

Hallo, and thanks for creating many articles about paintings, some of which I've found today while stub-sorting.

Please remember to help readers to find your articles. If a painting has alternative titles, like Saint Luke Painting the Crucifixion, then please create redirects from the alternative titles. Similarly, if you need to disambiguate the title, make sure that there is a link (sometimes a hatnote, sometimes a disambiguation page entry) from the undisambiguated title. If you have a look at [Special:Contributions/PamD my contributions list] for the last 20 minutes or so you can see the kind of thing. It helps readers to find the articles, and also reduces the chance of some enthusiastic but careless editor creating a duplicate article at a variant title. Thanks, and Happy Editing! PamD 09:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Venus figurines of Kostjonki moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Venus figurines of Kostjonki, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Peoples of Russia moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Peoples of Russia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Urartian Winged Deity moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Urartian Winged Deity, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexei Khitrovo (1776-1854) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Alexei Khitrovo (1776-1854), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 10:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zaragoza Museum moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Zaragoza Museum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. In fact, it has zero sources. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhaïl Preobrajensky moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mikhaïl Preobrajensky, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. In fact it has zero references. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Avenue Marceau[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Avenue Marceau, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexei Khitrovo (1848-1912) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Alexei Khitrovo (1848-1912), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Martín de Gurrea y Aragón moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Martín de Gurrea y Aragón, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Roland de Mois[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Roland de Mois! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please stop creating unreferenced articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 15:04, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pablo Esquert[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Pablo Esquert! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

PLease stop creating articles without references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Museo Goya - Colección Ibercaja - Museo Camón Aznar[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Museo Goya - Colección Ibercaja - Museo Camón Aznar! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please address concerns raised.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nikolai Khitrovo[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Nikolai Khitrovo! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cornard Wood, near Sudbury, Suffolk[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Cornard Wood, near Sudbury, Suffolk! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add a stub tag to articles this length.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References and communication[edit]

DilletantiAnonymous, can you please respond to messages? Editors are taking a lot of time contacting you. Referencing is really important in articles. Can you please create articles via WP:AFC and/or add clear references (not just external links) to articles you create? DOing these things wouldn't take you long but would save other editors a lot of work and frustration. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? This has become very disruptive editing. Boleyn (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martín de Gurrea y Aragón has been accepted[edit]

Martín de Gurrea y Aragón, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martín de Gurrea y Aragón, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ballobar and Antonio Pérez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of José Nicolás de Azara moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Portrait of José Nicolás de Azara, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Landscape with St María de Cervelló[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Landscape with St María de Cervelló! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

You have been repeatedly asked to stop creating unreferenced articles; this is disruptive editing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Landscape with St María de Cervelló moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Landscape with St María de Cervelló, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Landscape with the Discovery of Moses[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Landscape with the Discovery of Moses! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please stop creating unreferenced articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Landscape with the Discovery of Moses moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Landscape with the Discovery of Moses, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Landscape with the Temptation of St Antony moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Landscape with the Temptation of St Antony, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Landscape with Three Figures[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Landscape with Three Figures! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add stub tags to articles of this length.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Francisco Javier Ramos[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Francisco Javier Ramos! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

You have an empty references section but also a bibliography - did you use these as your references or are they just suggestions for further reading?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Diana and a Nymph Surprised by a Satyr[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Diana and a Nymph Surprised by a Satyr! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for two issues, but thank you for adding a reference - it really helps.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Adrienne (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Adrienne (painting)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lamentation of Christ (Massys)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Lamentation of Christ (Massys)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please mark articles this length as stubs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Landscape with the Burial of St Serapia[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Landscape with the Burial of St Serapia! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your referneces.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Ford (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating The Ford (painting)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has an empty references section - please add references to all articles you create.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I just wanted to leave a quick note to thank you for these painting articles - your work has not gone unnoticed, but I did just notice that this is all recent. Sometimes it is exhausting to consider the backlog we have of important paintings, and I for one believe that creating something in wikispace will lead to future edits by others. Making them findable with an image is a first step to drawing editors in. So thanks again for your work. Jane (talk) 08:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 16th September (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating 16th September (painting)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add stub tag for articles this short and make sure it is added to disambiguation page/hatnote at primary page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 13:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Summer (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Summer (painting)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please stop creating unreferenced articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Summer (painting) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Summer (painting), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 13:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy (El Greco, 1577-1580) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy (El Greco, 1577-1580), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unattributed translation / copyvio[edit]

Did you use a machine translation to create Merry Company (Van Honthorst) from nl:Vrolijk Gezelschap? The new English article follows the Dutch one very closely, with some text missed out or rearranged slightly. eg Google translation

That is permitted, as long as there is proper attribution of the source text, either directly in the text of the English article or on its talk page (for example by using Template:Translated page). Without that attribution, the translation becomes a copyright problem. Have you done this with any of your other articles? 213.205.198.224 (talk) 08:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are still creating translated copies of articles from other languages, without any attribution. Les Quarante-cinq is an unattributed translated copy of text from fr:Les Quarante-cinq, isn't it. This is not good enough. 213.205.240.186 (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References and communication[edit]

Dozens of editors have taken the time to contact you with their concerns and you continue to create unreferenced articles. You also have only responded to one of the many, many messages sent your way over the years, mainly on the same topic - articles of sometimes dodgy information, often completely unverified. It is essential that you communicate when other editors raise concerns, per WP:CONDUCT and WP:DISPUTE. Your way of editing has cost other editors many hours they could have spent elsewhere. Please stop. Can you agree to only create referenced articles and use WP:AFC? Boleyn (talk) 08:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Illuminated manuscripts by collection[edit]

Hi, if you are going to set up a whole tree of categories, please make some effort to populate them at least half-way properly. No categories for the Metropolitan, British Library, Vatican Library, and only 1 MS for the Louvre! You set these up last July. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 04:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to messages[edit]

Can you please respond to my message at User talk:DilletantiAnonymous#References and communication? This is now disruptive editing: you have ignored many, many concerns raised and continue with the same behaviours. This is now on the verge of going to WP:ANI. Please look at quarry:query/34173, click on 'Fork' then 'Submit query'. It will give you a full list of your creations that have been tagged for issues. Boleyn (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prayerbook of Albert of Brandenburg moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Prayerbook of Albert of Brandenburg, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Louis XII Book of Hours moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Louis XII Book of Hours, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Master of the Dresden Prayerbook moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Master of the Dresden Prayerbook, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Da Costa Book of Hours moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Da Costa Book of Hours, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Giovanni Bianconi (journalist)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giovanni Bianconi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 08:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of Nancy moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Battle of Nancy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple pages moved to draftspace[edit]

A number of articles that you recently created appear to be unsourced. Articles need citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your drafts to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the articles with minimal disruption. When you feel the articles meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus are ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The articles that I moved were:

Draft:The Cows (painting)
Draft:Vanitas (van Hemessen)
Draft:The Old Women
Draft:The Young Women
Draft:The Wolf of Gubbio
Draft:Arab Merchant Presenting a Mare
Draft:Medea (Delacroix)
Draft:The Beakful

While I understand your desire to document these works of art, references should be added. On the other hand, Berthe Morisot with a Fan, which does have referencs, was interesting to review, and I have patrolled it. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 00:46, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pandora (sculpture) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pandora (sculpture) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandora (sculpture) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cogaidh (talk) 15:14, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Deposition of Christ (Lotto)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Deposition of Christ (Lotto).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adolphe Tabarant moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Adolphe Tabarant, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Little Lange[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Little Lange! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add inline citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Bullfight (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating The Bullfight (painting)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 3 issues. Please mark articles this length as stubs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:17, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Claude Monet Painting in his Studio[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Claude Monet Painting in his Studio! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:17, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Cows[edit]

Your article has been placed back in mainspace after an editor has added references. And importantly, I've added the van Gogh template. Earlier I added 15 of your articles to the Manet template. Please add new pages to templates, they are an important part of the process (I see you add paintings to categories, so don't understand why you don't add them to the artist templates as well unless you work on mobile). Thanks again for all of your major work, appreciated. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Croquet Party[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating The Croquet Party! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Cows (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating The Cows (painting)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add WP:INLINECITED references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinacoteca Giovanni e Marella Agnelli moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Pinacoteca Giovanni e Marella Agnelli, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mixing up two Jacob de Wit paintings[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous, looks like you mixed up two paintings at Moses Elects Seventy Elders

Rijksmuseum version Moses choosing the seventy elders (Q17324807)
Paleis op de Dam version Moses elects the Council of Seventy Elders (Q28797797)

The Rijksmuseum website says their version is a study (modello) for the one at the Palace. Can you update your article? Multichill (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bullfight (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Bullfight (painting)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add stub tag to articles this length.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rest on the Flight into Egypt (Titian)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rest on the Flight into Egypt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 12:10, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond or at least consider[edit]

Requested that the Titian flight to Egypt painting page be brought back for further sources, alerted Wikiproject visual arts. DA, it'd be really cool if you could start to talk with Wikiproject members. I've added probably hundreds of your pages to the templates but I don't keep track of what you're working on and have probably missed many hundreds more which could be added to artist's templates. You do add your pages to categories (thanks), but watching category pages doesn't show added entries, and there have been many times I've clicked each entry on the template to see what is left over in the category. For example, I just added the Bullfight page to the Manet template, but there are 71 Manet's on the category page but only 58 now on the template. Now I'll have to click each one so I can then check the blue links on the category page to find the 13 that are missing. Template respect? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Done 6 July[reply]

Hi Randy I went ahead and saved this article, which seemed to be a short summary of the Italian. I didn't even know it was there. I removed the bits about attribution which are in the Italian wikipage but since I don't have that book I couldn't check. Anyways, having been taxed at 5 million pounds in 2002 it is definitely worth an article, so I restored an article to mainspace adding the references I do have. The other painting, if it turns out to indeed be a Titian related to this one, can always get its own article. This one is undisputed. Jane (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)t[reply]

Jane023, nice work! Being sarcastic, but we should set up a team to augment DA's work. They don't seem to communicate, so it can be an at-a-distance DilletantiAnonymousAppreciationSociety (DAAS), and can take turns looking for new or past articles that they've posted to add to and template. Yearly meeting at MoMA or somewhere. I've appreciated DA's work for a long time, and their productivity is, at least for the present Wikipedia era, very beneficial to Wikipedia's visual arts collection. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree! I think that person has no notifications enabled. They are active on Commons too, where another user (who probably needs their own "project of cleanup"), user:Sailko, has also uploaded a bunch of not-so-public Italian renaissance paintings we would not normally have access to. Jane (talk) 04:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't know we could have no notifications enabled. Thanks, will look up Sailko. Would be nice if more teachers made a class project of writing new Wikipedia visual art articles, many would be surprised on some of the well known paintings and statues not presently represented in the encyclopedia, and the surprising number of underrepresented major artists and museums. Your updated lists provide a nice overview of some of that. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:49, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Holy Ring[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holy Ring".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 10:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HMS Royalist (1841)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "HMS Royalist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 10:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Recipients of orders, decorations, and medals of the United Kingdom[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Recipients of orders, decorations, and medals of the United Kingdom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:House Order of Fidelity has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:House Order of Fidelity, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Venus figurines of Kostjonki[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Venus figurines of Kostjonki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity T 🌟 15:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Urartian Winged Deity[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Urartian Winged Deity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 11:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Urartian Winged Deity[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Urartian Winged Deity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Peoples of Russia[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Peoples of Russia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Women's Land Army moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, New Zealand Women's Land Army, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Recipients of orders, decorations, and medals of Ethiopia[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Recipients of orders, decorations, and medals of Ethiopia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Thanks for creating François Depeaux.

User:Kudpung while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

You (or somebody) translated this article from the page in the French Wikipedia. This is allowed, but please ensure that attribution is accorded. For details see: WP:TFOLWP.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Marly Horses[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thanks for creating Marly Horses! I edit here too, under the username Kudpung and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alexei Khitrovo (1776-1854)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexei Khitrovo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Royal Air Force[edit]

Please stop these edits. The post-war version is far and away the primary topic so doesn't need a disambiguator, the disambiguator you have chosen is wrong in any case (it should be '−') and the WAAF is a separate topic and should remain as such (they were technically separate organisations, not just a renaming). It wasn't broken; please don't try to fix it. I have reverted many of your edits. A hatnote is fine. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marly Horses moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Marly Horses, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Children in a Chariot[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Highway 89 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Children in a Chariot should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children in a Chariot .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Highway 89}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Highway 89 (talk) 22:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Judicial Police (Belgium) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Judicial Police (Belgium), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adolphe Tavernier moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Adolphe Tavernier, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:06, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Willbb234 (talk) 19:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Landscape with the Temptation of St Antony[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Landscape with the Temptation of St Antony.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Landscape with the Discovery of Moses[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Landscape with the Discovery of Moses.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Landscape with St María de Cervelló[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Landscape with St María de Cervelló.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advice[edit]

1.The Village of Voisins. The frWP accepts general references of the sort being used here, but the English WP requires specificreferences. You have to write them out in full with cite web or the like -- see WP:REFBEGIN for the methods. Please fix this, and please look at you other articlesand fix this also. I unfortunately do not really have the time to do itfor you myself, and if not fixed in a day or two, I will have to move it to draft to keep it from deletion.

2. With the other painting stubs or drafts that have been deleted, I will gladly restore them for you if you want to reference them properly. DGG ( talk ) 03:29, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

State Museum of Modern Western Art moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, State Museum of Modern Western Art, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:47, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Venlo Police Museum[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Venlo Police Museum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 23:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bridge at Villeneuve-la-Garenne[edit]

Thanks for creating this and adding a couple of sources.

The references to the sources need more detail, so that someone looking at the article can see how it is sourced without following the links: publisher, title, and access-date (web records can change over time) are the bare minimum.

Both sources are from the museum owning the painting: please try to add more information from reliable independent sources. Wikipedia cannot just produce a parallel catalogue for major galleries. Thanks. PamD 15:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've now found that there's a template for MoMA catalogue records - {{MoMAobject}}. I've used it to replace your ref to the catalogue record. To my surprise it doesn't take an "access date" field. PamD 15:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PamD just to let you know, the user doesn’t respond to anything on their talk page. Regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 17:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Summer (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Summer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HawkAussie (talk) 23:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lapidary Museum (Avignon) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Lapidary Museum (Avignon), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Battle of Nancy has been accepted[edit]

The Battle of Nancy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 19:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy (El Greco, 1577-1580)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy (El Greco, 1577-1580).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You started the draft on March 5, 2019. But you had already written it as an article on July 3, 2018. You seem to have noticed this, based o nthe article edit history, but you should at that time have asked that the draft be deleted by placed a {{db-self}} tag at the top. That you didn't do this has made considerable extra work for me and another administrator in clearing it up. Please take greater responsibility for your work,. DGG ( talk ) 14:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lapidary Museum (Avignon) has been accepted[edit]

Lapidary Museum (Avignon), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 14:17, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marly Horses has been accepted[edit]

Marly Horses, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 14:27, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is of course necessary is that you continue the translation from the French.

But in general:

Please, please, work first in Draft space, and as soon as there is a viable article with some references, submit it so it can be moved properly to main space. The easiest way to add at least a few references when translating is to simply copy the original ones as they stand. If they have been entered using a citation template, the template doe not copy over--I now just copy and paste the rendered text from the page, rather than fix the field names. If you add it to mainspace as soon as it's viable others can help. Or, of course, you can keep working on in in draft till it's finished. Your translations seem truly excellent. And, alternatively, work in main space, but add at least some references before you save it.

But what you absolutely should not do is write an incomplete article in main space without references. These will always get deleted or moved to draft, and then things get confusing. It's better to do it the way the system wants--in the end it saves trouble. I and several other admins have been trying to clean up your work . It would be a shame to have it lost because you did it in an unusual way and didn't follow up in time. You have 6 months, but after that it gets removed unless someone rescues it. Very few editors actually try to rescue--fortunately, I;m one of them, I'm interested in you subject field, and I am accustomed to doing WP translations , mainly from the French and German WPs (if they don't get too complicated--your French is considerably better than mine.

I am for now following up every one that got totally deleted, and trying to restore it at least to draft. I've also moved some incomplete drafts to main space. even though not all the sections were finished.

I'll give you any help I can, but I cannot count on finding time to continue doingthe sort of cleanup that you ought to be doing yourself. DGG ( talk ) 14:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1479 paintings[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1479 paintings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Portrait of José Nicolás de Azara[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Portrait of José Nicolás de Azara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

restored and accepted, but see below DGG ( talk ) 21:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Master of the Dresden Prayerbook[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Master of the Dresden Prayerbook.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Prayerbook of Albert of Brandenburg[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Prayerbook of Albert of Brandenburg.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Da Costa Book of Hours[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Da Costa Book of Hours.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added the obvious reference to hte museum web p on the item , restored it, and accepted it. Please remember notto put others in a position where they needto rescue the articles that you start. I am continuing to rescue every one I can, but at some point I am likely to lose patience. DGG ( talk ) 21:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Thanks for creating The Assumption of St Mary Magdalene.

User:Sagotreespirit while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Good work. We just need a few more references.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sagotreespirit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 16:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Special Art Historian's Barnstar[edit]

		The Special Barnstar
		I'm impressed by your tireless work on art history articles! Here is a special barnstar. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 16:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landscape with a Pig and a Horse has been accepted[edit]

Landscape with a Pig and a Horse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It technically meets our requirements for stubs, but it is confusing to beginners if you write an article as sketchy as this. DGG ( talk ) 21:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Da Costa Book of Hours has been accepted[edit]

Da Costa Book of Hours, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prayerbook of Albert of Brandenburg has been accepted[edit]

Prayerbook of Albert of Brandenburg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Portrait of José Nicolás de Azara has been accepted[edit]

Portrait of José Nicolás de Azara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Master of the Dresden Prayerbook has been accepted[edit]

Master of the Dresden Prayerbook, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landscape with the Temptation of St Antony (Lorrain) has been accepted[edit]

Landscape with the Temptation of St Antony (Lorrain), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landscape with the Finding of Moses (Lorrain) has been accepted[edit]

Landscape with the Finding of Moses (Lorrain), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landscape with St María de Cervelló has been accepted[edit]

Landscape with St María de Cervelló, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bathing Woman with Raised Arms moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Bathing Woman with Raised Arms, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Theseus Killing the Minotaur moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Theseus Killing the Minotaur, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 02:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello scope_creep, page lurker and DA fan here. You may be mistaken about the need to draft page this article, the two sources on the page seem fine to me, and include a link to the Museum catalog. That meets the criteria usually used for visual arts pages. Maybe take another glance. Thanks. The thought is that DA never looks at their talk page, which is too bad as maybe then they'd add their articles to templates. I've added hundreds of them to templates, and am pretty sure there are thousands I've missed. DA's contribution history contains undiscovered gems if someone wants to dive in and work the pages into the artist's templates. DA is good with adding artist categories, and I've often clicked on each entry on a template when I find that the category counts are higher than the amount of articles listed on the artist's template, and it's usually DA's articles which have ballooned them. This user is one of Wikipedia's hidden treasures, and is well known among the visual arts editors. Sometimes they have not used enough sources (mainly because a translated article doesn't include them), but this page seems to meet the bar. Thanks again. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:23, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, got the ping wrong last week. Hi Scope creep, and could you take another look at the page for the catalogue source mentioned? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Your articles on paintings are lovely, I enjoy reading them. Thanks for all of your work! Schazjmd (talk) 22:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Medea (Delacroix) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Medea (Delacroix), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vanitas (van Hemessen) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vanitas (van Hemessen), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Constant d'Hoffschmidt.

User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please stop creating unreferenced articles.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 05:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Constant d'Hoffschmidt moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Constant d'Hoffschmidt, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 05:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1st German Antique Police Car Museum[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thank you for creating 1st German Antique Police Car Museum.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crime Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Science Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Old Women concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Old Women, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Young Women concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Young Women, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Theseus Killing the Minotaur[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous, Hi @Randy Kryn: It's a beutiful picture and I like coming across them as well and wouldn't want it deleted, particulalry in light of the lack of images in Wikipedia. Count me in as a fan. I don't know what what criteria for articles of this type. I assumed a minumum of three references were useful. Back in a second or two. I will find a reference. scope_creep^Talk 12:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking another look. I think that artwork articles just need firm evidence that the artwork is real and notable, which can be provided by art or museum-quality catalog mentions, but I may be wrong. Of course the more references the better. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sandei Altarpiece moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sandei Altarpiece, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Intercession Altarpiece moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Intercession Altarpiece, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Please do not add content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 09:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Adolphe Tabarant concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adolphe Tabarant, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pinacoteca Giovanni e Marella Agnelli concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pinacoteca Giovanni e Marella Agnelli, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category Name for Sculptures of the Indianapolis Museum of Art[edit]

I started a discussion over at Category talk:Sculptures of the Indianapolis Museum of Art on the name of the category you created. I'd love to hear your thoughts as the category creator!

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Nagel (sculptor)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul Nagel (sculptor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lopifalko (talk) 06:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Paul Nagel (sculptor)[edit]

I have moved the article you created about Paul Nagel to Draft:Paul Nagel (sculptor), because it was nor ready for the main article space as it stood, and the alternative was to delete it under WP:CSD#A7. It looks to me as if this is a translation project in progress. if so, please remember that en.wikipeia has its own standards for notability and article inclusion, and the presence of an article on another edition of Wikipedia does not guarantee one here (nor vice versa). DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 08:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar[edit]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for your all of your new articles on art history again, so here's a second barnstar. I enjoyed reading your articles very much. Keep it up! — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 10:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for autopatrolled right[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous. Thank you for your request for the autopatrolled user group. Unfortunately it has not been granted at this time. Please check back at the requests page for the administrator's reason(s) - you may be able to apply again when the requirements have been satisfied. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Young Women in Black moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Young Women in Black, meeds more accessible source in English (or in French) to remain published. It would be notable regardless, but it's absurd to have a French work of such international fame sourced in the enWP only to Russian sources I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Louvre) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Louvre), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Pushkin Museum) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Young Women in Black, meeds more accessible source in English to remain published. It would be notable regardless, but it's absurd to have a French work of such fame sourced in the enWP only to Russian sources I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rest on the Flight into Egypt (Titian) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rest on the Flight into Egypt (Titian), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This topic already exists as an article. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adolphe Tabarant[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adolphe Tabarant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:HMS Royalist (1841) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:HMS Royalist (1841), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Entombment of Christ (Lotto) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Entombment of Christ (Lotto), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Wolf of Gubbio concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Wolf of Gubbio, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arab Merchant Presenting a Mare concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arab Merchant Presenting a Mare, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Beakful concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Beakful, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kolpingwerk moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kolpingwerk, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:11, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pinacoteca Giovanni e Marella Agnelli[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pinacoteca Giovanni e Marella Agnelli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 13:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

School posters moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, School posters, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:03, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Venus figurines of Kostjonki concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Venus figurines of Kostjonki, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tips re your articles[edit]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous. Great work you are doing adding/translating painting articles to en-Wikipedia! A couple of tips that might help you further:

1. Always try and add a Talk Page (there is an automatic Talk Page "rater" who can upload on your preferences tab).

2. The full-stop or comma should be before the <ref> and not after.

3. Do add stub tags (especially if the Talk Page rater identifies it as a stub).

4. Use the italic title template for paintings/artworks.

5. If you only have one-two refs for an article, make sure they are fully expanded so it is clear who good they are (name, title, accessdate etc.)

Nice job. Britishfinance (talk) 13:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Britishfinance. It is assumed that DA, who some of us recognize as a visual arts treasure here, does not look at their talk page (DA, prove me wrong!). Another point is artist templates, which I've sometimes added a dozen or more of DA's articles to. There are probably hundreds if not thousands of DA articles which are not templated, and it's a worthwhile exercise to pick a point in their contribution history and work on doing so. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Randy Kryn, and very good point re templates. Britishfinance (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Luciano Bellosi[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Luciano Bellosi to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. -Nahal^(T) 21:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Castelfiorentino Madonna.

User:DGG, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I'm glad to see that more and more of your excellent articles now have proper references. Remember you need to set an example for beginners andamateurs.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DGG}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DGG ( talk ) 06:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiener Hofmusikkapelle has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. Wiener Hofmusikkapelle, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Musée départemental des antiquités (Rouen) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Musée départemental des antiquités (Rouen), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salvatore Settis moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Salvatore Settis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv🍁 16:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chiara Frugoni moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Chiara Frugoni, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv🍁 16:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for creating this article. I did a little work on it and then moved it to mainspace: Chiara Frugoni. If you have any questions about women's biographies, or drafts you'd like someone to review, you can always ask for help from the friendly editors at Women in Red as our scope is women's biographies, women's works, women's issues. Happy editing! --Rosiestep (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Judicial Police (Belgium) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Judicial Police (Belgium), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Sleeping Girl (17th century painting).

User:Jmertel23, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

A very tiny issue, but wanted to make you aware of WP:REFPUNCT - the manual of style states that punctuation should appear before inline citations. Thank so much!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jmertel23}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Jmertel23 (talk) 19:12, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Joseph's Dream (Rembrandt, 1645).

User:Jmertel23, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

You can use the {{DISPLAYTITLE}} template to ensure that the article title appears with the appropriate italics.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jmertel23}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Jmertel23 (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Cleveland Museum of Art[edit]

Hello DilletantiAnonymous!

We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Cleveland Museum of Art, a GLAM project to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of CMA-related content, including artworks and artists featured in the Museum's collection. Based on your editing history, we thought you might be interested and hope that you will join us on our members page. Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doge's Palace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veronese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:New Zealand Women's Land Army concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:New Zealand Women's Land Army, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:State Museum of Modern Western Art concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:State Museum of Modern Western Art, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied/moved text from The Burning of the Houses of Lords and Commons to The Burning of the Houses of Lords and Commons (Philadelphia) and The Burning of the Houses of Lords and Commons (Cleveland) (your changes have since been reversed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zaragoza Museum concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Zaragoza Museum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Madonna of the Towers.

User:Jmertel23, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please review WP:REFPUNCT - punctuation should go before citations, not after. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jmertel23}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Jmertel23 (talk) 23:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: State Museum of Modern Western Art has been accepted[edit]

State Museum of Modern Western Art, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

I rescued this for you by adding some of the references from the Russian article. I ddn't attempt to format the others, or to give the titles in translation. That's your responsibility.

DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Entombment of Christ (Lotto) has been accepted[edit]

The Entombment of Christ (Lotto), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 22:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salvatore Settis has been accepted[edit]

Salvatore Settis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mikhail Preobrazhensky concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mikhail Preobrazhensky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland Museum of Art: Editing Campaign[edit]

Hello! Based on your editing interests I'd like to invite you to participate in the Cleveland Museum of Art Open Access Anniversary Editing Campaign through February 9; anyone who creates an article or expands two articles by 100+ words each will receive a postcard from the CMA. Cheers, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

La Rivista di Bergamo moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, La Rivista di Bergamo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 22:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lochis Madonna (Bellini), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lochis Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider archiving your talk page[edit]

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 306.2 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you.— Diannaa (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Greek and Hellenistic Sicily, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Battle of Himera and Dionysius II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mikhail Preobrazhensky[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mikhail Preobrazhensky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wiener Hofmusikkapelle[edit]

On 5 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wiener Hofmusikkapelle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Wiener Hofmusikkapelle, founded by Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I in 1498, was a forerunner of the Vienna Boys' Choir? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wiener Hofmusikkapelle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wiener Hofmusikkapelle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Chess Game (Campi painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thank you for creating The Chess Game (Campi painting).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The Russian and Italian articles have inline sources. Why not include them?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vexations}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vexations (talk) 03:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abbey-Basilica of San Martino delle Scale moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Abbey-Basilica of San Martino delle Scale, is an incomplete translation from Italian. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St George's Cathedral, Caccamo moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, St George's Cathedral, Caccamo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KylieTastic (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo Alliata di Villafranca moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Palazzo Alliata di Villafranca, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthias Stom[edit]

I recommend you work on Stom's article and get that to a better standard instead of creating separate articles about his artwork. Govvy (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palazzo Alliata di Villafranca has been accepted[edit]

Palazzo Alliata di Villafranca, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 02:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diocesan Museum of Palermo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Veneziano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Adolphe Tavernier concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adolphe Tavernier, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief, please stop creating these stubs in draft space. Just make the (interlinked) stub in main space! Just look up the wikidata item and use prep bio like this. Click the box for brief infobox and once you create the stub, link it on Wikidata. If you have issues drop me a line. Jane (talk) 10:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bathing Woman with Raised Arms concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bathing Woman with Raised Arms, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Military Order of Maria Theresa has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Military Order of Maria Theresa, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Young Women concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Young Women, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Intercession Altarpiece concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Intercession Altarpiece, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sandei Altarpiece concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sandei Altarpiece, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits[edit]

File:Watchlist extract 4 april 2020.jpg

now

Hi DilletantiAnonymous, can you please mark your category edits as "minor", as it is constantly logging up watchlists. Obviously I am very appreciative of your work on the project, and follow your article creations, so no offence meant. Thanks Ceoil (talk) 20:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hercules (Piero della Francesca)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thank you for creating Hercules (Piero della Francesca).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article currently cites only one independent realiable source. Please add at least one more to establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 00:31, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Paintings of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Paintings of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monreale Cathedral mosaics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint Germanus, Saint Sixtus and Saint Viator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at December 12, you may be blocked from editing. You are aware of the requirement for sources. See User_talk:DilletantiAnonymous#Sources_needed_for_Days_of_the_Year_pages Toddst1 (talk) 20:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adolphe Tavernier[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adolphe Tavernier".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ruffo di Calabria family[edit]

Hi thanks for creating this article. Am I right in thinking it’s largely a translation of the it.wiki article? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Stained glass windows of Chartres Cathedral[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thank you for creating Stained glass windows of Chartres Cathedral.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is a really good article, but I wonder if it needs all of the empty sections? If you aren't able to fill them, perhaps they should be removed for now? It makes the table of contents section look intimidatingly long. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mcampany}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mcampany (talk) 00:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stained glass windows of Chartres Cathedral, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Evangelists and City of God (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vanitas (van Hemessen)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vanitas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at September 25. Toddst1 (talk) 21:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Old Women[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Old Women".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Julius Ludwig Rothweil[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julius Ludwig Rothweil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Young Women in Black concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Young Women in Black, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Pushkin Museum) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Pushkin Museum), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Blue Dancers concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blue Dancers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blue Dancers has been accepted[edit]

Blue Dancers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Young Women in Black has been accepted[edit]

Young Women in Black, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kolpingwerk concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kolpingwerk, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Baptism of Christ (Parmigianino).

User:Moneytrees, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nothing wrong with the page, but could you please attribute in the edit summary when you copy over a chunk of commented out foreign wiki text? Thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Moneytrees}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 00:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:School posters concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:School posters, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Noli me tangere (Andrea del Sarto).

User:Vexations, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The single provided ref is wrong. Can you fix this please? There is plenty of scholarly work on this painting.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vexations}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vexations (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Leda and the Swan (Uffizi).

User:Vexations, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Can you complete the reference to Hoogwerff please? Thanks,

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vexations}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vexations (talk) 15:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Life of the Virgin (Dürer)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thank you for creating Life of the Virgin (Dürer).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A good way to expand the size of visual art articles is to simply offer concise yet informative descriptions of the art. I believe there are a sufficient quantity of sources out on the Internet that you can use to aid your analysis.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GeneralPoxter}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Small Passion[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thank you for creating Small Passion.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You have been asked so many times not to add articles with no clear references. PLEASE stop doing this. It would be very easy for you to correct, but not easy for anyone else. You continue to risk being blocked.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Louvre) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Louvre), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Louvre) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Louvre). Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 16:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Madonna of the Book (Pontormo).

User:Vexations, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

When translating an article, please make sure to link to the original version, either using Edit links under Languages or using Wikidata. Easiest to do via the Italian article. Click on Elemento Wikidata, which should take you to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3842621 add the english page at the bottom of the page. Also note that attribution is required, see WP:TFOLWP

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vexations}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vexations (talk) 01:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Members of the Fugger family has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Members of the Fugger family has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Self-Portrait (Sofonisba Anguissola) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Self-Portrait (Sofonisba Anguissola) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Self-Portrait (Sofonisba Anguissola) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   Kadzi   (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peltzer case moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Peltzer case, has many empty sections. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Guardroom (Teniers).

User:Vexations, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

A machine translation is worse than no translation at all. In what universe is "Onde Yootboog" a translation of "Oude Voetboog"? And you just leave it to other people to clean up this mess? Unbelievable.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vexations}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vexations (talk) 21:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Beakful has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Beakful. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bernardino Campi Painting a Portrait of Sofonisba Anguissola moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Bernardino Campi Painting a Portrait of Sofonisba Anguissola, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 01:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Wolf of Gubbio[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Wolf of Gubbio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wolf of Gubbio has been accepted[edit]

The Wolf of Gubbio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lapablo (talk) 12:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Johannes Godefridus Frederiks[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous,

Thank you for creating Johannes Godefridus Frederiks.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You have been asked many times; please do not create unreferenced articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 12:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes Godefridus Frederiks moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Johannes Godefridus Frederiks, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 12:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:School posters[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "School posters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kolpingwerk[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kolpingwerk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:53, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arab Merchant Presenting a Mare[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arab Merchant Presenting a Mare".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Medea (Delacroix) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Medea (Delacroix), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HMS Royalist (1841)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "HMS Royalist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 07:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HMS Royalist (1841) has been accepted[edit]

HMS Royalist (1841), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lapablo (talk) 10:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rest on the Flight into Egypt (Titian)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rest on the Flight into Egypt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Mosca (Il Moschino) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Francesco Mosca (Il Moschino), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 18:13, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Judicial Police (Belgium)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judicial Police".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evening (painting) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Evening (painting), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 22:12, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Garden Terrace moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Garden Terrace, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 02:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Woman before the Setting Sun moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Woman before the Setting Sun, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 02:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neubrandenburg Burning moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Neubrandenburg Burning, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 02:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mikhail Preobrazhensky has been accepted[edit]

Mikhail Preobrazhensky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Piero del Pollaiolo painting series[edit]

I see you've created a series of articles about related paintings by Piero del Pollaiolo, each of which is an exact copy of the others aside from one short sentence. Do you not agree that it would be much better to create one article about the entire commission? All of this replicated information seems less than ideal. -- Fyrael (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cityscape paintings of Venice[edit]

This category is really unhelpful - or at least removing the articles from Cat "Venice in art". The whole point of the great majority of most paintings of Venice is that they show water and city together, typically more water than city. I'm like to start a cfd. Johnbod (talk) 22:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johnbod, it's likely a translation of the category it:Categoria:Vedute di Venezia cityscape is probably not the best translation of vedute. Vexations (talk) 22:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it - the creator of Category:Cityscape paintings is Swedish. I've nothing against Category:Cityscapes & created/added two of the subcats, including Category:Venice in art. I also don't like the wp belief that art=paintings. No doubt there will be no response here. Category:Cityscape art (much older) is also pointless. Johnbod (talk) 23:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous

Thank you for creating Mark Simmons (police officer).

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article, but note that other editors have called for more evidence that Simmons is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. He made the news once or twice because of an investigation, but that may not be enough. If this issue is not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeroboam Sacrificing to Idols (August 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.bibleodyssey.net/en/tools/image-gallery/k/kingdom-of-israel,. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Jeroboam Sacrificing to Idols may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DilletantiAnonymous, Dan arndt, I've now removed the copyvio, but there's not much left – it'll need to be rewritten. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation[edit]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Perseus and Andromeda (Lemoyne). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Perseus and Andromeda), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 22:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem at Bacchus (Rubens). PamD 07:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hôtel Grimod de La Reynière. Toddst1 (talk) 00:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please note the message from Toddst1 above? Repeated failure to follow the guidelines on sourcing of DOTY articles could be interpreted as disruptive editing. Deb (talk) 03:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your username...[edit]

...is an insult to the Italian language. It's dilettanti, one L and two Ts. Fix it, Jesus! --93.66.3.131 (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanni Maria Mosca moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Giovanni Maria Mosca, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 12:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St George's Cathedral, Caccamo has been accepted[edit]

St George's Cathedral, Caccamo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 00:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Young Women has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Young Women. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 08:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced personal content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Simon Hatzl, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This is a short block for disruptive editing by introducing unsourced material. If you fail to take note, the next block will be much longer. Deb (talk) 07:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts[edit]

Your poorly-referenced articles on Luise von Finckh and Harald Windisch have been moved to draft space. It's up to you whether you make the effort to bring them up to standard. Deb (talk) 07:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intercession Altarpiece has been accepted[edit]

Intercession Altarpiece, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 19:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partially blocked from[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 23:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

for an unattributed copy at The Crowning of Saint Catherine, which you've been previously warned about. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 23:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Crowning of Saint Catherine[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Crowning of Saint Catherine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bguthriephotos.com/graphlib.nsf/Keys/2018_OH_TAM_SVisual. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DilletantiAnonymous (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The copyright violation was not mine, but unknowingly stubbed out by me from Toledo Art Museum to create The Crowning of Saint Catherine, as shown when User:Onel5969's Speedy Deletion request for the latter was declined two days ago by User:Moneytrees. DilletantiAnonymous (talk) 22:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have validated that you did indeed copy content without attribution, as described by Moneytrees below. Yamla (talk) 10:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that you were not blocked for the G12, but rather The Crowning of Saint Catherine was an unattributed copy of Toledo Museum of Art, which you've been warned against doing before. You also have a history of other copyright violations as well. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 00:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abbey-Basilica of San Martino delle Scale[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abbey-Basilica of San Martino delle Scale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Louvre)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aurora and Cephalus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Recipients of orders, decorations, and medals of Tajikistan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Recipients of orders, decorations, and medals of Tajikistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peltzer case[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peltzer case".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:38, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Beakful[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Beakful".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bernardino Campi Painting a Portrait of Sofonisba Anguissola[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bernardino Campi Painting a Portrait of Sofonisba Anguissola".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Johannes Godefridus Frederiks[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Johannes Godefridus Frederiks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Nagel (sculptor)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul Nagel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Francesco Mosca (Il Moschino)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francesco Mosca".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Garden Terrace[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Garden Terrace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:La Rivista di Bergamo[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "La Rivista di Bergamo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sandei Altarpiece[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandei Altarpiece".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Medea (Delacroix)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Medea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeroboam Sacrificing to Idols[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johnbod (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alan George Sholto Douglas-Pennant for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan George Sholto Douglas-Pennant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan George Sholto Douglas-Pennant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dumelow (talk) 13:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Luise von Finckh[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luise von Finckh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Harald Windisch[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harald Windisch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Josef Ellers[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Josef Ellers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Giovanni Maria Mosca[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giovanni Maria Mosca".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 13:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Woman before the Setting Sun[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Woman before the Setting Sun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blind Man's Bluff (Fragonard, 1775-1780)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blind Man's Bluff (Fragonard, 1775-1780), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blind Man's Bluff (Fragonard, 1775-1780) has been accepted[edit]

Blind Man's Bluff (Fragonard, 1775-1780), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 19:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Young Women[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Young Women, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Evening (painting)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Evening (painting), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Neubrandenburg Burning[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neubrandenburg Burning, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Woman before the Setting Sun[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Woman before the Setting Sun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neubrandenburg Burning has been accepted[edit]

Neubrandenburg Burning, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

I know it is not finished, but it would be deleted otherwise, and it's enough for a stub at present

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evening (painting) has been accepted[edit]

Evening (painting), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

I know it is not finished, but it would be deleted otherwise, and it's enough for a stub at present

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Museum of Antiquities (Rouen)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Museum of Antiquities (Rouen), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Portrait paintings of the Louvre has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Portrait paintings of the Louvre has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:18th-century Belgian architects[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:18th-century Belgian architects indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:43, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Museum of Antiquities (Rouen) has been accepted[edit]

Museum of Antiquities (Rouen), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 23:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Siege of Thionville (1870)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Siege of Thionville (1870). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 1#Siege of Thionville (1870) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aurora and Cephalus (Guérin, Louvre)[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aurora and Cephalus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simon Hatzl[edit]

The article Simon Hatzl has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Police stations in the London Borough of Haringey[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Police stations in the London Borough of Haringey indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Woman before the Setting Sun[edit]

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Woman before the Setting Sun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC) {{subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Bardi Madonna|concern=Already covered in more detail in [[Sandro_Botticelli]. This is a dupe}} Mr.weedle (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bardi Madonna[edit]

The article Bardi Madonna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already covered in more detail in Sandro_Botticelli This is a dupe

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monticchiello Altarpiece[edit]

The article Monticchiello Altarpiece has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N. How can something theoretical/speculation even be notable?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monticchiello Altarpiece for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monticchiello Altarpiece is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monticchiello Altarpiece until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lucretia (Baldung) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucretia (Baldung) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucretia (Baldung) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

James of UR (talk) 19:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1504 sculptures[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1504 sculptures indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latvian Lutheran theologians has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Latvian Lutheran theologians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latvian Lutheran hymnwriters has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Latvian Lutheran hymnwriters has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Renaissance Revival architecture in Estonia has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Renaissance Revival architecture in Estonia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Latvian Christian hymnwriters[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Latvian Christian hymnwriters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Latvian hymnwriters[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Latvian hymnwriters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Drawings in the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen has been nominated for upmerging[edit]

Category:Drawings in the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen has been nominated for upmerging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sculptures depicting the Last Supper has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Sculptures depicting the Last Supper has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sculptures depicting Christ carrying the cross has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Sculptures depicting Christ carrying the cross has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Battleshort[edit]

Template:Battleshort has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q 𝟤 𝟪 08:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sculptures depicting the Entombment of Christ has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Sculptures depicting the Entombment of Christ has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Drawings in the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Drawings in the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British Christian hymnwriters by nationality has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:British Christian hymnwriters by nationality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 11:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Non-Austrian military personnel in Austrian armies has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Non-Austrian military personnel in Austrian armies has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Patrons of the arts by nationality and medium has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Patrons of the arts by nationality and medium has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Non-Austrian military personnel in Austrian armies[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Non-Austrian military personnel in Austrian armies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Judith in film has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Judith in film has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Allegorical paintings by Russian artists has been nominated for splitting[edit]

Category:Allegorical paintings by Russian artists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Allegorical paintings by Hungarian artists has been nominated for splitting[edit]

Category:Allegorical paintings by Hungarian artists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Allegorical paintings by Austrian artists has been nominated for splitting[edit]

Category:Allegorical paintings by Austrian artists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christ Crowned with Thorns (Annibale Carracci, Bologna)[edit]

The article Christ Crowned with Thorns (Annibale Carracci, Bologna) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is the same as another page, Christ Crowned with Thorns (Annibale Carracci), but includes less information than the other page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Portrait fo Ambroise Vollard with a Cat" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Portrait fo Ambroise Vollard with a Cat has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § Portrait fo Ambroise Vollard with a Cat until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 21:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]